[ad_1]
Some time in the past, Amartya Sen discovered himself a lot alarmed by the rising recognition of Ram Navami competition in West Bengal. So he apparently went to his four-year-old granddaughter and requested who her favorite deity was. Maa Durga, the kid replied. And that’s when Dr. Sen arrived at his profound realization: Maa Durga is a part of the tradition of Bengal, Shri Ram is just not. This is what he preached final 12 months from a pulpit at Jadavpur University.
Those who’re attempting to attract partition traces between Maa Durga and Shri Ram have come to show us in regards to the thought of India. And the thought of Bengal, which in keeping with them, could or will not be a part of the bigger thought of India. Let that sink in.
In truth, Durga Puja is called Akaal Bodhon (out of season worship) in Bengal. This refers to Shri Ram needing to go away for Lanka, earlier than which he needed to invoke the goddess Durga out of season. For the Ashtami puja, Shri Ram ready to worship the goddess with 108 blue lotuses. But the goddess steals one lotus, attempting to check his devotion. Distraught at discovering simply 107 blue lotuses, Shri Ram will get able to take out one in every of his eyes because the lacking providing.
And but there are folks like Amartya Sen who’re attempting to separate Durga from Ram.
But depart that apart for a second. What is Amartya Sen attempting to say right here? That the tradition of Bengal is outlined by the cultural practices of his household? Anyone who practices something barely totally different is an outsider? Is this not the textbook definition of xenophobia? And the place are the hordes of liberals who lecture all day about tolerance and variety? Does Amartya Sen’s xenophobia get a move as a result of he’s not a fan of the BJP?
Of course it does. Right now, “good xenophobia,” re-branded as regional pleasure, is the principle marketing campaign plank of liberals as Bengal will get prepared for Assembly elections in May 2021. Today, Amartya Sen is again; this time saying that individuals of Bengal can’t be worthy heirs of Tagore until they assist his beloved ‘secular’ events.
Yes, the identical ‘secular’ events which gladly gave away two-thirds of Bengal to Pakistan. That is why the rest is named West Bengal, keep in mind? What about East Bengal? What occurred there to the good Bengali custom of worshiping Maa Durga? The nice Bhadralok intellectuals like Amartya Sen not often ever converse on this. All they care about is tearing West Bengal out of the bigger Hindu material of India. We know precisely what occurs when this material tears. They say that in 30 years, there gained’t be any Hindus left in Bangladesh.
You will observe that folk like Amartya Sen are obsessive about issues like who’s the ‘heir’ to what, which means a fascination with royalty. Indeed, like every court docket mental, Sen has an simply foldable ego that permits him to grovel earlier than kings and queens. When in England, he insists that solely Christian religion colleges are acceptable. No query of secularism there. You should observe the faith of her majesty the queen of England. He had an opportunity assembly with Rahul Gandhi and determined virtually instantly that the latter would make an excellent Prime Minister. Rahul was a prince, in spite of everything. Amartya Sen has a pure reverence for that.
This is in distinction to Amartya Sen’s contempt for the folks and their verdict. When PM Modi was elected in 2014, Amartya Sen sneered that he would “allow” Modi to rule. Yes certainly. Seventeen crore folks voted for BJP in 2014, however it’s Amartya Sen, India’s emperor obvious, who will get to “allow” Modi to rule. He even added a rider: “allow” him to rule in a democratic approach. Again, instructing democracy to the person who simply gained seventeen crore votes. And groveling earlier than the queen of England and her faith. That’s Amartya Sen for you.
When any individual tries to criticize Amartya Sen, there’s an unsaid counter-argument that comes up. Did you win a Nobel? Then, how dare you criticize somebody who did? Now, Amartya Sen is just too intelligent to name himself a Marxist, however he has admitted to partaking significantly with Marxism all his life. You may need noticed that no biologist at the moment engages significantly with creationism. No physicist at the moment engages significantly with flat earth theories. When Amartya Sen’s competence was put to check in the actual world, he achieved nothing at Nalanda University. Exactly like Marxism has achieved nothing in the actual world. So a flop in the actual world and a world famend knowledgeable whereas partaking with failed theories. There is little question that Sen is an “intellectual.”
[ad_2]
