Malini Awasthi on how she was stopped from singing a bhajan on Doordarshan below UPA as a result of it stated Lord Ram was born in Ayodhya

Ever since India achieved independence in 1947, the Congress occasion has studiously adopted political insurance policies which have run counter to the pursuits of the Hindu majority neighborhood. From Jawaharlal Nehru’s staunch refusal to revive the hallowed Somnath Temple to its previous glory to its unabashed observe of minority appeasement, to questioning the existence of Lord Rama and concocting the imaginary assemble of “Saffron Terror”, Congress has a storied historical past of undermining Hindus and relegating them to the secondary standing.
In one more show of Congress’ treachery towards the Hindus, famend folks singer Malini Awasthi not too long ago revealed in a information present that she was stopped from singing a spiritual bhajan on public broadcaster Doordarshan in 2005 as a result of it stated Lord Rama was born in Ayodhya.
Speaking about how the then UPA authorities in energy stopped her from singing a composition devoted to Lord Rama, Padmashree Awardee Malini Awasthi stated, “There was a time when I was appointed to sing for public broadcaster Doordarshan…I offered them to sing a hymn on Lord Rama’s birth. Initially, they agreed to it but when I started, it included a stanza that mentioned Lord Rama’s birth in Ayodhya. Suddenly, they came and told me this cannot go on air and asked me to sing another hymn.”
*2005 में मालिनी अवस्थी को दूरदर्शन पर ये कह कर भजन गाने से रोक दिया गया था कि इसमेें राम का जन्म अयोध्या में होना बताया गया है।**यह था और है कांग्रेस का हिंदू विरोधी, घिनौना चेहरा* pic.twitter.com/pMrPHVB8KE— धर्मों रक्षति रक्षितः ✍️ हर_कण_हिन्दू (@BemB5t928V53eUK) September 8, 2021
“Since I am inquisitive by nature, I asked them what’s the problem with this composition. They said it refers to Lord Rama’s birth in Ayodhya. Being a follower of Sanathan Dharma, this was unacceptable to me. We have celebrated Lord Rama’s birth in Ayodhya for years. I told them I cannot record any other hymn if you are seeking to deny the truth.” Awasthi recounted throughout a programme on News Nation.
It is price noting that Congress has lengthy been accused of utilizing state broadcasters to set their agenda and share a specific narrative, which has virtually all the time labored towards the pursuits of Hindus. It compelled artists to toe a specific line that jibed with its bigger political discourse, with insubordination leading to ouster and ostracisation. One of the foremost musicians in India’s historical past, Pandit Hridaynath was sacked from the All India Radio throughout Congress years for singing a poem penned by freedom fighter Veer Savarkar.
All India Radio below Congress rule sacked Pandit Hridaynath for composing tunes based mostly on poems written by Veer Savarkar
Hridaynath and his sisters, Lata Mangeshkar and Usha Mangeshkar, have been recognized for composing tunes based mostly on poems written by Veer Savarkar. However, this didn’t sit nicely with the Congress occasion, which had assiduously created a story that villainised the liberty fighter. As a consequence, the All India Radio below the Congress rule fired Hridaynath Mangeshkar for his musical composition on Veer Savarkar’s poems.
Years later, in an interview with ABP Majha, Hridaynath Mangeshkar admitted how he was fired from All India Radio as a result of he selected to compose a poem written by Veer Savarkar. About 53 minutes into the interview, Mangeshkar shared the anecdote when he was canned from his job on the All India Radio, solely as a result of he had dared to create a musical rendition of Veer Savarkar’s iconic poem whereby he extolled the ocean to take him again to the motherland, referring to Savarkar’s time in jail within the Andamans.
Congress’s penchant for dehumanising Hindus
Congress has a chequered historical past of dehumanising Hindus. It had moved heaven and earth to concoct the “Saffron Terror” narrative by falsely implicating Sadhvi Pragya and even Lt Col Purohit. It was Congress that needed to cross the Communal Violence Bill which mainly ensured that solely Hindus could be thought of perpetrators and by no means a Muslim, ought to there be any communal violence. The invoice was shaped by individuals who have been related to varied foreign-funded NGOs. It was Rahul Gandhi who deemed legendary “saffron terror” extra harmful than LeT. It was P Chidambaram and Sushil Kumar Shinde who referred to as Hindus terrorists with no proof or purpose. It was Manmohan Singh who stated Muslims have the primary proper on our nation’s sources.
It was Congress that divided Hindus by giving Lingayats the separate faith tag. It was Congress’ stand that was supported by Hafiz Saeed. It was Congress that ran a ‘Modi hatao desh bachao’ Facebook marketing campaign in Pakistan and it was Congress whose leaders went to Pakistan and derided India. The listing of Congress’ treachery with respect to Hindus is fairly limitless and the above-mentioned cases are only a few examples to focus on Congress’ anti-Hindu leanings.