“RTI: Threats to Hinduism ‘imaginary’, says Union home ministry”, blared a TOI headline as your complete left-liberal political institution within the nation and a number of other Congress politicians or affiliated activists began tweeting how the Amit Shah-led Union Home Ministry has dismissed threats to Hinduism as ‘imaginary’. The New Indian Express too carried an identical headline- “Look who’s saying threats to Hinduism are imaginary.”हिंदू धर्म ख़तरे में नही है, ये बात काल्पनिक है– गृह मंत्रालयUnion Home Ministry Says Threats to Hinduism ‘Imaginary’ https://t.co/0QPHirVhea— Srinivas BV (@srinivasiyc) September 22, 2021मनीष जबलपुरे की गृह मंत्रालय की RTI के जवाब में गृह मंत्री अमित शाह जी ने “हिंदू धर्म ख़तरे में है” को काल्पनिक बताया है। मोदीशाह जी आप हिंदुओं को कब तक गुमराह करते रहोगे?#जागो_हिंदुओं_जागोUnion Home Ministry Says Threats to Hinduism imaginary https://t.co/p1iaIvqA8Z— digvijaya singh (@digvijaya_28) September 22, 2021Ministry of Home Affairs has responded to an RTI saying threats to Hinduism are “imaginary”.Uff. What is that this yaar. Now what is going to our poor TV information channels do? Run exhibits on “Hindu khatre mein NAHI hai?”https://t.co/c2HnqPaNFI— meghnad 🔗 (@Memeghnad) September 21, 2021Hindu khatre mein nahi hai? Threats to Hinduism ‘imaginary’: Home Ministry https://t.co/s1ccuOdEOR @deccanherald— Satish Acharya (@satishacharya) September 21, 2021Threat to Hinduism is imaginary !!The Ministry of Home Affairs headed by BJP chief Amit Shah has categorically acknowledged that it has no information or proof regarding any so-called ‘threats’ to Hindu faith, in a current RTI reply to Nagpur-based activist Mohnish Jabalpure.— Odisha Pradesh Congress Sevadal (@SevadalOR) September 21, 2021Even Jagran carried a report by the Union Home Ministry reply to an RTI question by a Nagpur-based activist Mohnish Jabalpure who had sought proof of “threats to the ‘Hindu religion’ in the country” that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has in its possession. With such media reviews, the left-liberal institution began taking political potshots on the ruling BJP and claiming that Hindus can by no means be victims in India. So, let’s examine- did the Home Ministry actually say that Hindus are usually not at risk?Interestingly, not one of the reviews in regards to the MHA reply to the RTI question has given a textual content of the RTI reply, nor have they connected a picture of the reply that they might have procured on a request to the applicant. The media homes have merely revealed what appears extra like a misinterpretation of what the MHA would have acknowledged.Source: Newstrack EnglishIt is implausible to just accept {that a} Central Public Information Officer, who is meant to take care of RTIs, would have responded to a political or opinion-based question about ‘threat to Hinduism’. In the almost definitely situation, the RTI reply would have described the query and never the ‘threat to Hinduism’ as “imaginary”.At the tip of the day, the aim and coverage of the Right to Information Act, 2005 is to not give replies to ‘imaginary’ questions or serve the opinions of involved authorities officers.Questions concerning political ideologies or apprehensions of a social character don’t kind part of the federal government or official file. So, how can a authorities division or Ministry probably give a cogent reply to such questions? The reply given to the RTI queries in such circumstances tends to be a really common. So to say that the Home Ministry has made any categorical remarks in regards to the ‘threat to Hinduism’ doesn’t appear correct.It must also be made clear that authorities information don’t comprise details about political points and common opinions like threats to a selected faith or ideological opinions. Also, the federal government doesn’t categorize subjective opinions as public information. Even if one makes an RTI question, the data that may be sourced basically pertains to statistics, details and figures.In reality, points like threats to ideologies or non secular freedoms aren’t within the realm of formal authorities establishments. This is how trendy governance is formed the world over and Ministries or Departments are usually not presupposed to delve into political points or questions of a social character. So, perhaps, one would obtain an identical reply if he requested for particulars of ‘threat to liberal values’.For the left-liberals, RTI replies to such questions typically grow to be a topic. An identical RTI reply on an software by Saket Gokhale had acknowledged that there isn’t any ‘tukde tukde gang’ within the MHA’s information, after which left-liberals began to have a good time. Of course, there isn’t any such MHA file as a result of the conceptualisation of ‘tukde tukde gang’ is a matter of ideological opinion, which the nationalists use to explain a gaggle of people that aren’t dedicated to nationalistic beliefs.This is like Saket Gokhale’s RTI which confirmed that there was no ‘tukde tukde gang’ on any of the Home Ministry’s lists 🤡 https://t.co/GcR1BJ8kp0— Ajit Datta (@ajitdatta) August 23, 2021One might prefer it or not, however the MHA didn’t dismiss the risk to Hinduism as ‘imaginary’. MHA solely refused to reply a query that it isn’t presupposed to take care of. However, all that the RTI‘s response did was to permit the left-liberals to discover a speaking level and switch it into baseless propaganda.