Mumbai: On Wednesday, a periods court docket denied actor Kangana Ranaut‘s request to have the defamation lawsuit filed against her by lyricist Javed Akhtar transferred from the magistrate’s court docket in suburban Andheri. The decide additionally declined to switch her counter-complaint towards Akhtar, which she had filed in Andheri, to a unique court docket. The second further principal and periods decide (Dindoshi) S S Oza’s detailed order was not instantly accessible.Also Read – Kangana Ranaut Takes a Dig at Gangubai Kathiawadi’s Box Office Via Blind Article: ‘Kya Majbooriyan Rahi Hongi…’
In her plea, Ranaut alleged that the tenth Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court (Andheri) was biased and prejudiced towards her by refusing to grant her a everlasting exemption from look and threatened to problem an arrest warrant for a ‘bailable and non-cognizable misdemeanor.’ An identical request had been dismissed by the chief metropolitan Justice of the Peace (CMM) in October 2021, thus she went to the periods court docket. Also Read – Lock Up’s First Elimination: Kangana Ranaut And The Audience Vote Godman Swami Chakrapani Out
In November 2020, the lyricist filed a swimsuit with the Andheri Justice of the Peace, stating that the Queen actor made defamatory allegations about him in a tv interview, damaging his repute. Kangana dragged his identify for no trigger when discussing the potential of a ‘coterie’ in Bollywood within the wake of actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s reported dying in June 2020, in line with Javed Akhtar’s prison defamation case. In flip, Ranaut filed a counter-complaint towards Akhtar within the Andheri court docket, citing ‘extortion and criminal intimidation.’ Also Read – Gangubai Kathiawadi Beats Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi, Raazi After 8 Days at Box Office – Check Detailed Collection Report
Following a public disagreement with a co-star, Kangana Ranaut claimed that Javed Akhtar summoned her and her sister Rangoli Chandel to his residence and ‘criminally intimidated and threatened’ them. The accusation was refuted by Akhtar.
(With inputs from PTI)
