Abhishek Jha, Varanasi: On the common darshan worship of Shringar Gauri, the fee proceedings in Gyanvapi (Gyanvapi Masjid Case) and the maintainability of this case, the court docket has given the subsequent date of July 4. The listening to was happening within the court docket of Varanasi District Judge Ajay Krishna Vishvesh. The Muslim facet took the matter to the Supreme Court. Following the order of the Supreme Court, the case was transferred from the court docket of Civil Judge Senior Division Ravi Kumar Diwakar to the court docket of District Judge Ajay Krishna Special. The listening to on this matter was happening repeatedly since twenty sixth.
The listening to of the Gyanvapi Masjid case resumed on Monday within the Varanasi District Judge’s Court. During Monday’s listening to, the Muslim facet first made its level, however throughout the listening to, their argument couldn’t be accomplished. The argument of the Masjid Committee has been given within the District Court whether or not the petition is maintainable below the Place of Worship Act or not. 56 factors have been positioned on behalf of the Hindu facet within the court docket. It has been mentioned in them that these locations don’t come below the purview of the Places of Worship Act. The matter ought to be checked out inside that scope. At the identical time, there’s a steady demand from the Muslim facet to dismiss this case. 47 folks have been allowed to go to the listening to.
Gyanvapi Case: Petitions proceed in Gyanvapi case, Nirmohi Akhara additionally got here within the discipline, demanding proper to worship
Hearing on Supreme Court order
Hearing is occurring within the Varanasi District Judge’s court docket on the order of the Supreme Court. Muslim events had reached the Supreme Court concerning the Gyanvapi Masjid case. After the listening to, the court docket transferred the matter to the Varanasi District Judge Court. The determination has been taken by the court docket to listen to the matter expeditiously. During the final listening to within the court docket, objections have been lodged on 12 factors from the Muslim facet.
Debate on releasing movies and photographs
There has additionally been a debate within the court docket on whether or not the video and photograph must also be made public or given to the events involved. There was additionally a remark from the Supreme Court concerning the video and photograph not being leaked to the media.
Hindu facet prepared for listening to on a regular basis
The matter is getting extended within the district decide’s court docket. During the final listening to, para 12 was learn on behalf of the Muslim events. In this regard, Vishnu Jain, the lawyer for the Hindu facet, says that he ought to current his facet quickly. They are speaking about 7/11. On this foundation they’ll current their case. He mentioned that the Hindu facet is prepared for listening to on a regular basis. If they should reply on all factors, then give them.
