Express News Service
NEW DELHI: A Delhi Court on Tuesday granted bail to Shankar Mishra, who was arrested for allegedly peeing on his co-passenger, a septuagenarian lady, on board an Air India flight in an inebriated situation.
Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, Harjyot Singh Bhalla allowed bail to Mishra on furnishing a bond of Rs 1 lakh.
After listening to the arguments of the events, on January 30, the decide reserved Mishra’s bail software after observing that what the accused had allegedly completed is disgusting however the court docket is certain to observe the legislation.
During the course of the listening to, cops advised the court docket that the incident defamed India internationally.
On January 27, the identical decide adjourned the matter after the complainant’s advocate Ankur Mahindra knowledgeable the court docket that he has not been handed a duplicate of the bail plea and in addition took be aware of the absence of the Investigation officer.
Moreover, the Public Prosecutor (PP) opposed Mishra’s bail contending that the latter initially didn’t cooperate through the investigation and had absconded along with his cellphones switched off. The cops additionally argued that the accused threatened the complainant.
The decide noticed that the witnesses named by the prosecution “are not deposing in your (police) favour”.
Mishra, who’s presently in judicial custody, knocked on the doorways of the court docket once more final Wednesday in search of bail towards the sooner order of Metropolitan Magistrate Komal Garg, who had rejected his plea, saying that the alleged act of accused of relieving himself upon the complainant is “utterly disgusting and repulsive” and the act itself is ample to outrage the modesty of a lady.
On January 13, in a u-turn within the case, Mishra had advised a Delhi court docket that he didn’t urinate on the co-passenger lady onboard the Air India flight and he or she urinated on herself, a contradiction to his earlier assertion wherein he advised the court docket that he’s not operating away from the alleged act which was ‘obscene.’
The alleged incident had occurred on November 26 final 12 months when a drunk Mishra walked as much as the girl’s seat within the enterprise class on an Air India New York-New Delhi flight, uncovered himself, and urinated on her.
Earlier through the arguments, Mishra’s counsel mentioned his act was not pushed by sexual need nor aimed toward outraging the complainant’s modesty.
Mishra’s counsel identified that Section 354 offers with sexual harassment and questioned the relevance of the Act within the current case.
The complainant’s counsel, nonetheless, opposed Mishra’s bail software, claiming she was being threatened.
NEW DELHI: A Delhi Court on Tuesday granted bail to Shankar Mishra, who was arrested for allegedly peeing on his co-passenger, a septuagenarian lady, on board an Air India flight in an inebriated situation.
Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, Harjyot Singh Bhalla allowed bail to Mishra on furnishing a bond of Rs 1 lakh.
After listening to the arguments of the events, on January 30, the decide reserved Mishra’s bail software after observing that what the accused had allegedly completed is disgusting however the court docket is certain to observe the legislation.
During the course of the listening to, cops advised the court docket that the incident defamed India internationally.
On January 27, the identical decide adjourned the matter after the complainant’s advocate Ankur Mahindra knowledgeable the court docket that he has not been handed a duplicate of the bail plea and in addition took be aware of the absence of the Investigation officer.
Moreover, the Public Prosecutor (PP) opposed Mishra’s bail contending that the latter initially didn’t cooperate through the investigation and had absconded along with his cellphones switched off. The cops additionally argued that the accused threatened the complainant.
The decide noticed that the witnesses named by the prosecution “are not deposing in your (police) favour”.
Mishra, who’s presently in judicial custody, knocked on the doorways of the court docket once more final Wednesday in search of bail towards the sooner order of Metropolitan Magistrate Komal Garg, who had rejected his plea, saying that the alleged act of accused of relieving himself upon the complainant is “utterly disgusting and repulsive” and the act itself is ample to outrage the modesty of a lady.
On January 13, in a u-turn within the case, Mishra had advised a Delhi court docket that he didn’t urinate on the co-passenger lady onboard the Air India flight and he or she urinated on herself, a contradiction to his earlier assertion wherein he advised the court docket that he’s not operating away from the alleged act which was ‘obscene.’
The alleged incident had occurred on November 26 final 12 months when a drunk Mishra walked as much as the girl’s seat within the enterprise class on an Air India New York-New Delhi flight, uncovered himself, and urinated on her.
Earlier through the arguments, Mishra’s counsel mentioned his act was not pushed by sexual need nor aimed toward outraging the complainant’s modesty.
Mishra’s counsel identified that Section 354 offers with sexual harassment and questioned the relevance of the Act within the current case.
The complainant’s counsel, nonetheless, opposed Mishra’s bail software, claiming she was being threatened.