Asawa claims ₹1.5 lakh below part 80C, ₹2.4 lakh in home hire allowance (HRA), ₹50,000 invested in National Pension Scheme (NPS) (Section 80CCD (1B)) and ₹8,500 for medical insurance coverage premium (Section 80D) as deductions. For an revenue of ₹18 lakh, he’ll nonetheless pay ₹22,050 much less tax below the previous regime after claiming the above deductions.
Like Asawa, for taxpayers with revenue above ₹15 lakh, the brand new regime (or concessional tax regime, as additionally it is recognized) might not be helpful even in its improved kind. Mint’s calculation reveals that taxpayers who’ve incomes starting from ₹15.5 lakh to ₹5 crore and declare tax deductions and exemptions upwards of ₹4.25 lakh pays extra tax below the brand new regime. For incomes from ₹7 lakh to ₹15 lakh, taxpayers will want deductions and exemptions starting from ₹1 lakh to ₹4.08 lakh to cut back taxable revenue (see graphic).
Yet, consultants say this isn’t tough to attain. “After the tax rebate restrict was raised to ₹5 lakh in 2019, many taxpayers with incomes of as much as ₹8 lakh opted for aggressive tax saving plans to cut back their taxable revenue under ₹5 lakh. Of course, this may increasingly have pushed some to make investments that they don’t require or don’t essentially align with their objectives, which I don’t suggest both. But, squarely from a tax perspective, people can obtain break-even limits if they’ve a mortgage or are paying hire, clubbed with 80C and commonplace deduction,” said Amit Suri, a mutual fund distributor.
View Full Image
Graphic: Mint
Besides, there are deductions and exemptions, such as children’s tuition fee (under 80C), the interest portion of home and education loans, and HRA, that benefit taxpayers under the old regime. Take the case of Delhi-based Ankur Kaushik, for instance. His income is ₹21 lakh and he claims ₹4.5 lakh in HRA by paying rent to his mother and ₹1 lakh deduction on interest paid towards education loan. “My HRA alone gives me enough incentive to stick to the old regime. If the government removes the clause that you can’t claim HRA by paying rent to your parents, I may think of moving to the new regime,” mentioned Kaushik.
New regime: Who advantages?
Taxpayers with incomes of as much as ₹7 lakh can transfer to the brand new regime right away as the brink for tax rebate below Section 87A has been elevated from ₹5 lakh to ₹7 lakh. Under the previous regime, taxpayers with revenue of ₹7 lakh have to assert deductions of ₹2 lakh to convey down their web taxable revenue under the ₹5 lakh no-tax threshold. Delhi-based Lakshaya Bakshi is happy “My revenue is ₹7.3 lakh. I can swap to the brand new tax regime subsequent 12 months and I received’t should pay tax,” mentioned the 29-year-old. Being a salaried particular person, Bakshi will profit from the ₹50,000 commonplace deduction launched within the concessional regime.
But, will he cease tax-saving investments that he at the moment makes? “I can’t management worker provident fund (EPF) contributions as they’re obligatory however I’ll cease my investments in fairness linked financial savings schemes (ELSS). I spend money on shares immediately, so I can use the freed-up capital for that,” said 29-year-old Bakshi.
Experts say taxpayers moving to the new regime can have better control over their investments. “Tax planning should be incidental to overall financial planning but taxpayers don’t look at that. For instance, in trying to exhaust all the available deductions and exemptions, people often use up their entire disposable income and don’t create an emergency fund, which can now be prioritized,” mentioned Rohit Shah, a registered funding advisor (RIA) and founding father of Getting You Rich.
Prableen Bajpai, founder, FinFix Research, mentioned traders who can save simply ₹1.5 -2 lakh a 12 months, can now make investments as per their necessities as an alternative of shopping for tax-saving devices. However, she is fast so as to add that this has a flip facet: The onus to avoid wasting can be on the taxpayer now. “I strongly imagine long-term investing needs to be incentivized, particularly for younger earners, and 80C was place to begin to inculcate the financial savings behavior,” Bajpai said.
Asawa is a case in point. “Planning for 80C drove me to invest for the long term. Had the money been liquid, I would have spent it,” he mentioned. “Despite my saving behavior, I’ll liquidate investments if the necessity arises. For that motive, longer lock-ins with EPF, NPS and ELSS work for my retirement purpose.”
In Mumbai, 37-year-old Ishita Visaria shares the same views. “Enforced saving takes away the temptation of spending and has worked very well for me. My investments in PPF (Public Provident Fund) and ELSS funds have grown substantially so far. If it were left up to me, I would not have saved the same way,” mentioned Visaria, a chartered accountant.
The identical might be mentioned about medical insurance coverage and pure life insurance coverage as properly, each of which carry tax incentives below the previous regime. “The query to ask is how many individuals will purchase insurance coverage early of their lives if tax sops doesn’t power them to,” said Suri.
To be fair, gross mis-selling also happens in the name of tax saving. “Gradually as the new regime takes over, the menace of insurance mis-selling will be curbed,” mentioned Bajpai. She added that the brand new regime makes good sense for senior residents with revenue as much as ₹7 lakh not simply because they don’t should hassle about tax planning but in addition as a result of it should significantly enhance their money flows. “For senior residents, it’s not straightforward to park funds in tax-saving devices simply to have the ability to save ₹10,000- ₹15,000 in tax on the finish of the 12 months.”
Satya Sontanam contributed to this story.
Catch all of the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint.
Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
More
Less