Express News Service
LUCKNOW: The Varanasi District Court admitted a petition filed to demand an in depth scientific investigation and survey by the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) of your total Gyanvapi mosque, on Tuesday.
As many as eight plaintiffs, along with the 4 Hindu women plaintiffs who had sought worship of Maa Shringar Gauri and totally different deities on Gyanvapi mosque premises (18/2022 Rakhi Singh vs UP state and others), filed three suits sooner than Varanasi district select courtroom, on Tuesday, demanding the detailed scientific investigation of the present building of Gyanvapi mosque using stylish technological devices like GPR Survey, excavation, courting methodology and totally different stylish strategies.
The petitioners moreover demanded an investigation of the age and nature of the event of the western wall of the Gyanvapi premises. Supreme Court lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain had filed the petition on behalf of the six Hindu plaintiffs, acknowledged district authorities counsel Mahendra Nath Pandey.
Supreme Court lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain had filed the petition on behalf of the six Hindu plaintiffs, acknowledged district authorities counsel Mahendra Nath Pandey.
Admitting the petition, the Varanasi district courtroom select AK Vishvesha requested the Gyanvapi mosque administration committee to file its objection to the plea by May 19.
AIM was given a reproduction of the latest petitions. The courtroom posted the matter for May 22. During the listening to, Jain acknowledged that every one the believers of Hindu Sanatan Dharm wished to know that the fact related to ‘Adi Vishweshwara’ (Lord Shiva) ought to return out.
The petitioners represented by Vishnu Shankar Jain included Ram Prasad Singh, Mahant Shiv Prasad Pandey, Lakshmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas, and Rekha Pathak.
On Friday, May 12, the Allahabad High Court had ordered a willpower of the age of the development claimed to be a Shivling found throughout the pond of the ‘Wuzu Khana’ (ablution centre) on the Gyanvapi mosque premises using stylish experience.
The High Court had put apart the October 14, 2022 order of the Varanasi District Court which had rejected the plea for scientific investigation, along with carbon courting, of the purported ‘shivling’ found on May 16, 2022, all through a court-mandated survey of the Gyanvapi mosque premises.
The High Court had directed the Varanasi district select to proceed, in accordance with the regulation, on the equipment by the Hindu worshippers for conducting a scientific probe of the purported ‘shivling’, paving the best way during which for determining the age of the development.
LUCKNOW: The Varanasi District Court admitted a petition filed to demand an in depth scientific investigation and survey by the Archeological Survey of India (ASI) of your total Gyanvapi mosque, on Tuesday.
As many as eight plaintiffs, along with the 4 Hindu women plaintiffs who had sought worship of Maa Shringar Gauri and totally different deities on Gyanvapi mosque premises (18/2022 Rakhi Singh vs UP state and others), filed three suits sooner than Varanasi district select courtroom, on Tuesday, demanding the detailed scientific investigation of the present building of Gyanvapi mosque using stylish technological devices like GPR Survey, excavation, courting methodology and totally different stylish strategies.
The petitioners moreover demanded an investigation of the age and nature of the event of the western wall of the Gyanvapi premises. Supreme Court lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain had filed the petition on behalf of the six Hindu plaintiffs, acknowledged district authorities counsel Mahendra Nath Pandey.googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
Supreme Court lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain had filed the petition on behalf of the six Hindu plaintiffs, acknowledged district authorities counsel Mahendra Nath Pandey.
Admitting the petition, the Varanasi district courtroom select AK Vishvesha requested the Gyanvapi mosque administration committee to file its objection to the plea by May 19.
AIM was given a reproduction of the latest petitions. The courtroom posted the matter for May 22. During the listening to, Jain acknowledged that every one the believers of Hindu Sanatan Dharm wished to know that the fact related to ‘Adi Vishweshwara’ (Lord Shiva) ought to return out.
The petitioners represented by Vishnu Shankar Jain included Ram Prasad Singh, Mahant Shiv Prasad Pandey, Lakshmi Devi, Sita Sahu, Manju Vyas, and Rekha Pathak.
On Friday, May 12, the Allahabad High Court had ordered a willpower of the age of the development claimed to be a Shivling found throughout the pond of the ‘Wuzu Khana’ (ablution centre) on the Gyanvapi mosque premises using stylish experience.
The High Court had put apart the October 14, 2022 order of the Varanasi District Court which had rejected the plea for scientific investigation, along with carbon courting, of the purported ‘shivling’ found on May 16, 2022, all through a court-mandated survey of the Gyanvapi mosque premises.
The High Court had directed the Varanasi district select to proceed, in accordance with the regulation, on the equipment by the Hindu worshippers for conducting a scientific probe of the purported ‘shivling’, paving the best way during which for determining the age of the development.
