By PTI
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned for 4 weeks the listening to on a plea filed by former JNU scholar Umar Khalid looking for bail in a case lodged below anti-terror legislation UAPA over his alleged involvement within the conspiracy behind the northeast Delhi riots of February 2020.
A bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi stated the matter requires an in depth listening to.
“In this matter, we will have to go document by document. You file something on what is the evidence available with regard to the charges,” the bench informed senior advocate Kapil Sibal, showing for Khalid.
Supreme Court choose Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra had on August 9 recused himself from listening to Khalid’s plea.
Khalid’s petition difficult the October 18, 2022 order of the Delhi High Court, which had rejected his bail plea within the matter, had come up for listening to earlier than a bench of Justices A S Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra.
The excessive courtroom had rejected Khalid’s bail plea, saying he was in fixed contact with different co-accused and the allegations in opposition to him had been prima facie true.
The excessive courtroom had additionally stated the actions of the accused prima facie certified as a “terrorist act” below the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and several other others have been booked below the anti-terror legislation UAPA and several other provisions of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly being the “masterminds” of the February 2020 riots, which left 53 folks useless and over 700 injured.
The violence erupted throughout the protests in opposition to the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
Khalid, arrested by the Delhi Police in September 2020, had sought bail on grounds that he neither had any prison position within the violence nor any “conspiratorial connect” with another accused within the case.
The Delhi Police had opposed Khalid’s bail plea within the excessive courtroom, saying the speech delivered by him was “very calculated” and he introduced up contentious points like Babri Masjid, triple talaq, Kashmir, the alleged suppression of Muslims and the CAA and NRC.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned for 4 weeks the listening to on a plea filed by former JNU scholar Umar Khalid looking for bail in a case lodged below anti-terror legislation UAPA over his alleged involvement within the conspiracy behind the northeast Delhi riots of February 2020.
A bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi stated the matter requires an in depth listening to.
“In this matter, we will have to go document by document. You file something on what is the evidence available with regard to the charges,” the bench informed senior advocate Kapil Sibal, showing for Khalid.googletag.cmd.push(operate() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
Supreme Court choose Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra had on August 9 recused himself from listening to Khalid’s plea.
Khalid’s petition difficult the October 18, 2022 order of the Delhi High Court, which had rejected his bail plea within the matter, had come up for listening to earlier than a bench of Justices A S Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra.
The excessive courtroom had rejected Khalid’s bail plea, saying he was in fixed contact with different co-accused and the allegations in opposition to him had been prima facie true.
The excessive courtroom had additionally stated the actions of the accused prima facie certified as a “terrorist act” below the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and several other others have been booked below the anti-terror legislation UAPA and several other provisions of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly being the “masterminds” of the February 2020 riots, which left 53 folks useless and over 700 injured.
The violence erupted throughout the protests in opposition to the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
Khalid, arrested by the Delhi Police in September 2020, had sought bail on grounds that he neither had any prison position within the violence nor any “conspiratorial connect” with another accused within the case.
The Delhi Police had opposed Khalid’s bail plea within the excessive courtroom, saying the speech delivered by him was “very calculated” and he introduced up contentious points like Babri Masjid, triple talaq, Kashmir, the alleged suppression of Muslims and the CAA and NRC.
