By PTI
AHMEDABAD: A classes court docket right here on Thursday dismissed pleas of Aam Aadmi Party leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Sanjay Singh difficult summons issued to them by a trial court docket in a legal defamation case over feedback about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s academic qualification.
This means the AAP leaders should seem earlier than the trial court docket when it fixes the date of the subsequent listening to.
Sessions Judge J M Brahmbhatt upheld the choice of the trial court docket to summon the 2 AAP leaders and stated that the trial court docket order was “neither illegal nor erroneous”.
“The present criminal revision application is hereby dismissed,” stated the court docket in its order within the open court docket.
“Considering the facts of the present case, the magistrate (trial court) has reached the conclusions of subjective satisfaction and issued the process after analyzing and appreciating the material on record, which is neither patently illegal nor erroneous,” the court docket stated.
“The order passed by Additional chief metropolitan magistrate is hereby confirmed,” the court docket additional stated. The legal defamation case in opposition to Kejriwal and Singh has been filed by the Gujarat University (GU).
Kejriwal’s lawyer had argued that GU was akin to the “state” so it may file defamation circumstances. The lawyer additionally contended that the varsity registrar who filed the grievance has no authority to take action.
The classes court docket, nevertheless, rejected the arguments saying the federal government has some management over GU however it’s an impartial college. The court docket additionally noticed that registrar Piyush Patel who filed the grievance had produced an authority letter from the vice-chancellor of the college.
“Upon perusal of the trial court order, I am of the view that the learned magistrate has taken into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and issued the process,” the court docket noticed..
Delhi Chief Minister Kejriwal and Rajya Sabha member Singh are going through a legal defamation case filed by the Gujarat University over their “sarcastic” and “derogatory” statements in reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s diploma.
Their pleas had been heard within the court docket of classes decide Brahmbhatt, days after the Gujarat High Court directed the issues to be assigned to a different decide because the one who was presiding over them earlier went on depart. The HC had directed the principal decide of the classes court docket to switch the AAP leaders’ pleas to a different court docket and get them determined inside 10 days from the date on which they had been assigned.
The two leaders had moved revision pleas earlier than the classes court docket difficult the summons issued by the trial court docket, however the issues had been stored for subsequent listening to on September 16, a lot after the date on which they had been required to reply to the summons of the trial court docket. They then approached the HC.
The metropolitan court docket had summoned the 2 leaders after observing that prima facie there seemed to be a case in opposition to them beneath part 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code.
GU registrar Piyush Patel had filed a defamation case in opposition to Kejriwal and Singh over their feedback after the Gujarat High Court put aside an order of the Chief Information Commissioner on PM Modi’s diploma.
They made “defamatory” statements in press conferences and on Twitter, now X, focusing on the college over Modi’s diploma, the complainant acknowledged.
The AAP leaders made sarcastic and defamatory statements deliberately to harm the status of GU which has established its title among the many public, as per the complainant.
Some of the feedback quoted by the complainant and attributed to Kejriwal are: “If there is a degree and it is genuine, then why is it not being given?”; “They are not giving degree because it might be fake”; and “If the Prime Minister studied at Delhi University and Gujarat University, then Gujarat University should celebrate that its student became the country’s PM”.
Singh stated that “they (GU) are trying to prove the PM’s fake degree as genuine”, based on the complainant.
The AAP leaders’ statements would make an individual consider that GU points faux and bogus levels, the complainant had stated.
AHMEDABAD: A classes court docket right here on Thursday dismissed pleas of Aam Aadmi Party leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Sanjay Singh difficult summons issued to them by a trial court docket in a legal defamation case over feedback about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s academic qualification.
This means the AAP leaders should seem earlier than the trial court docket when it fixes the date of the subsequent listening to.
Sessions Judge J M Brahmbhatt upheld the choice of the trial court docket to summon the 2 AAP leaders and stated that the trial court docket order was “neither illegal nor erroneous”.googletag.cmd.push(perform() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
“The present criminal revision application is hereby dismissed,” stated the court docket in its order within the open court docket.
“Considering the facts of the present case, the magistrate (trial court) has reached the conclusions of subjective satisfaction and issued the process after analyzing and appreciating the material on record, which is neither patently illegal nor erroneous,” the court docket stated.
“The order passed by Additional chief metropolitan magistrate is hereby confirmed,” the court docket additional stated. The legal defamation case in opposition to Kejriwal and Singh has been filed by the Gujarat University (GU).
Kejriwal’s lawyer had argued that GU was akin to the “state” so it may file defamation circumstances. The lawyer additionally contended that the varsity registrar who filed the grievance has no authority to take action.
The classes court docket, nevertheless, rejected the arguments saying the federal government has some management over GU however it’s an impartial college. The court docket additionally noticed that registrar Piyush Patel who filed the grievance had produced an authority letter from the vice-chancellor of the college.
“Upon perusal of the trial court order, I am of the view that the learned magistrate has taken into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and issued the process,” the court docket noticed..
Delhi Chief Minister Kejriwal and Rajya Sabha member Singh are going through a legal defamation case filed by the Gujarat University over their “sarcastic” and “derogatory” statements in reference to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s diploma.
Their pleas had been heard within the court docket of classes decide Brahmbhatt, days after the Gujarat High Court directed the issues to be assigned to a different decide because the one who was presiding over them earlier went on depart. The HC had directed the principal decide of the classes court docket to switch the AAP leaders’ pleas to a different court docket and get them determined inside 10 days from the date on which they had been assigned.
The two leaders had moved revision pleas earlier than the classes court docket difficult the summons issued by the trial court docket, however the issues had been stored for subsequent listening to on September 16, a lot after the date on which they had been required to reply to the summons of the trial court docket. They then approached the HC.
The metropolitan court docket had summoned the 2 leaders after observing that prima facie there seemed to be a case in opposition to them beneath part 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code.
GU registrar Piyush Patel had filed a defamation case in opposition to Kejriwal and Singh over their feedback after the Gujarat High Court put aside an order of the Chief Information Commissioner on PM Modi’s diploma.
They made “defamatory” statements in press conferences and on Twitter, now X, focusing on the college over Modi’s diploma, the complainant acknowledged.
The AAP leaders made sarcastic and defamatory statements deliberately to harm the status of GU which has established its title among the many public, as per the complainant.
Some of the feedback quoted by the complainant and attributed to Kejriwal are: “If there is a degree and it is genuine, then why is it not being given?”; “They are not giving degree because it might be fake”; and “If the Prime Minister studied at Delhi University and Gujarat University, then Gujarat University should celebrate that its student became the country’s PM”.
Singh stated that “they (GU) are trying to prove the PM’s fake degree as genuine”, based on the complainant.
The AAP leaders’ statements would make an individual consider that GU points faux and bogus levels, the complainant had stated.
