Express News Service
NEW DELHI: Former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu approached the Supreme Court looking for to quash the FIR registered in opposition to him by APCID in reference to the multi-crore AP State Skill Development Corporation (APSSDC) rip-off. He approached the highest court docket on Saturday in opposition to the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s order on September 22, refusing to quash the FIR and the order dated September 10, 2023 of his judicial remand.
The TDP chief, in his plea, argued that he was arrested in an unlawful method and disadvantaged of his liberty motivated solely by political causes by disregarding the truth that all actions had been initiated with out acquiring the sanction mandated by Section 17A of the PC Act.Observing that the plea was devoid of benefit, the High Court said that it can’t conduct a mini-trial on a petition filed below Section 482 of CrPC (quash petition).
In the 68-page order, Justice Okay Sreenivasa Reddy identified that the APCID, which registered a case in 2021, had examined greater than 140 witnesses and picked up greater than 4,000 paperwork pertaining to the case. At this stage, the place the investigation is on fulcrum of achieving finality, this court docket will not be inclined to intrude with the impugned proceedings, the Judge dominated. After the dismissal of the Naidu’s quash petition, the ACB particular court docket granted two-day custody of the previous CM to the APCID for questioning in reference to the APSSDC rip-off.
NEW DELHI: Former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister and TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu approached the Supreme Court looking for to quash the FIR registered in opposition to him by APCID in reference to the multi-crore AP State Skill Development Corporation (APSSDC) rip-off. He approached the highest court docket on Saturday in opposition to the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s order on September 22, refusing to quash the FIR and the order dated September 10, 2023 of his judicial remand.
The TDP chief, in his plea, argued that he was arrested in an unlawful method and disadvantaged of his liberty motivated solely by political causes by disregarding the truth that all actions had been initiated with out acquiring the sanction mandated by Section 17A of the PC Act.Observing that the plea was devoid of benefit, the High Court said that it can’t conduct a mini-trial on a petition filed below Section 482 of CrPC (quash petition).
In the 68-page order, Justice Okay Sreenivasa Reddy identified that the APCID, which registered a case in 2021, had examined greater than 140 witnesses and picked up greater than 4,000 paperwork pertaining to the case. At this stage, the place the investigation is on fulcrum of achieving finality, this court docket will not be inclined to intrude with the impugned proceedings, the Judge dominated. After the dismissal of the Naidu’s quash petition, the ACB particular court docket granted two-day custody of the previous CM to the APCID for questioning in reference to the APSSDC rip-off. googletag.cmd.push(perform() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
