AUS vs IND | Sachin Tendulkar asks ICC to reassess ‘Umpires Call’ in DRS

[ad_1]

Image Source : GETTY IMAGES Sachin Tendulkar Former India skipper Sachin Tendulkar has questioned ‘Umpires Call’ clause within the Decision Review System saying that the International Cricket Council (ICC) must reassess it. “The reason players opt for a review is because they’re unhappy with the decision taken by the on-field umpire. The DRS system needs to be thoroughly looked into by the @ICC, especially for the ‘Umpires Call’,” stated the batting maestro. The ‘Umpires Call’ clause comes into play in ball-tracking know-how in case of shut calls, leaving the umpire’s choice as binding. The cause gamers go for a evaluation is as a result of they’re sad with the choice taken by the on-field umpire. The DRS system must be totally seemed into by the @ICC, particularly for the ‘Umpires Call’.#AUSvIND— Sachin Tendulkar (@sachin_rt) December 28, 2020 The third day’s play within the second Test between Australia and India noticed the ‘Umpires Call’ rescuing the Aussies twice within the second session following shut calls. Not a foul evaluation by India, however it’s not sufficient to safe of the wicket of Labuschagne.Live #AUSvIND: https://t.co/0nwGP4uO49 pic.twitter.com/wuq7xwTIrz— cricket.com.au (@cricketcomau) December 28, 2020 Joe Burns survived a leg-before wicket enchantment off a yorker from Jasprit Bumrah within the third over of Australia’s second innings. After the umpire had given it not out, India went for a evaluation however the batsman survived after Umpire’s Call was taken under consideration on the level of ball hitting his leg. Soon after, Australia No. 3 Marnus Labuschagne additionally survived in opposition to Mohammed Siraj. The umpire had given him not out after the batsman was caught in his crease. However, ‘Umpires Call’ got here to his rescue once more because the ball was proven barely clipping the bails.

[ad_2]