Express News Service
DEHRADUN: In Uttarakhand, the marriageable age of ladies is prone to be elevated whereas an in-depth examine is being undertaken to ban traditions like ‘halala’ and ‘iddat’. Both these points are being significantly thought-about by the knowledgeable committee drafting the Uniform Civil Code within the state.
The closing report of the draft shall be submitted by the committee to the federal government inside the subsequent fortnight. A senior member of the Uniform Civil Code drafting committee and former IAS Shatrughan Singh instructed this newspaper, “The committee has also received suggestions that in case of death of an employed son, his parents are eligible for compensation apart from his wife. Even if the wife re-marries, then also they should have a share in the compensation received on the death of the husband.”
“In such a case, if the wife dies, her parents have no support, and then the responsibility of their maintenance should be with the husband. The committee is also brainstorming on all these suggestions,” mentioned Shatrughan Singh.
Speaking to this newspaper, ‘Shahar Qazi’ Mohammad Ahmed Qasmi strongly objected to the solutions saying, “No one has the right to interfere in Quran Sharif, similarly no one has the right to interfere in ‘iddat’ and ‘halala’.”
“The reason behind the ‘observation’ of the ‘Iddat’ period is to find out whether the woman is pregnant or not and accept the certainty of paternity, the Uttarakhand government, central government or any authority has no right to interfere in this sensitive decision related to Shariat and culture of Muslim society”, Qasmi added.
“There is no acceptance in many Muslim countries on a controversial issue like ‘halala’, its end is in the interest of the society,” BJP spokesperson Ravinder Kumar mentioned.
UCC solutions
Ban on polygamy within the state
Live-in relationship to be declared and oldsters knowledgeable
Girls to get equal share in ancestral property
Adoption for all
Equal grounds for divorce ought to apply to each husband and spouse
DEHRADUN: In Uttarakhand, the marriageable age of ladies is prone to be elevated whereas an in-depth examine is being undertaken to ban traditions like ‘halala’ and ‘iddat’. Both these points are being significantly thought-about by the knowledgeable committee drafting the Uniform Civil Code within the state.
The closing report of the draft shall be submitted by the committee to the federal government inside the subsequent fortnight. A senior member of the Uniform Civil Code drafting committee and former IAS Shatrughan Singh instructed this newspaper, “The committee has also received suggestions that in case of death of an employed son, his parents are eligible for compensation apart from his wife. Even if the wife re-marries, then also they should have a share in the compensation received on the death of the husband.”
“In such a case, if the wife dies, her parents have no support, and then the responsibility of their maintenance should be with the husband. The committee is also brainstorming on all these suggestions,” mentioned Shatrughan Singh. googletag.cmd.push(perform() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
Speaking to this newspaper, ‘Shahar Qazi’ Mohammad Ahmed Qasmi strongly objected to the solutions saying, “No one has the right to interfere in Quran Sharif, similarly no one has the right to interfere in ‘iddat’ and ‘halala’.”
“The reason behind the ‘observation’ of the ‘Iddat’ period is to find out whether the woman is pregnant or not and accept the certainty of paternity, the Uttarakhand government, central government or any authority has no right to interfere in this sensitive decision related to Shariat and culture of Muslim society”, Qasmi added.
“There is no acceptance in many Muslim countries on a controversial issue like ‘halala’, its end is in the interest of the society,” BJP spokesperson Ravinder Kumar mentioned.
UCC solutions
Ban on polygamy within the state
Live-in relationship to be declared and oldsters knowledgeable
Girls to get equal share in ancestral property
Adoption for all
Equal grounds for divorce ought to apply to each husband and spouse
