Viral sensation Sunny Dhimaan has thrust India’s judiciary into the spotlight, alleging a stark double standard in handling Hindu versus Muslim cases. ‘Nyay ki do aankhein’ – two eyes of justice – is his damning metaphor for what he sees as preferential treatment doled out along religious lines.
Delving into specifics, Dhimaan highlights how Muslim petitions often secure immediate Supreme Court attention, from halting constructions to protecting waqf properties. Meanwhile, Hindu litigants endure endless adjournments in pursuits of historical justice, like reclaiming ancient temples from disputed lands. ‘It’s not rocket science; it’s a pattern anyone can see,’ he asserts.
The backdrop is India’s complex tapestry of faith-based conflicts, where history, politics, and law intersect explosively. Dhimaan’s commentary taps into frustrations simmering since landmark verdicts like Ayodhya, extending to hotspots like Gyanvapi and Shahi Idgah. His video, laced with clips of courtroom dramas, has galvanized online armies on both sides.
Defenders of the system chalk it up to the nature of urgent reliefs under Article 32, not bias. Yet Dhimaan insists urgency is manufactured – Hindu festivals disrupted by processions get no such expediency. Social media erupts: supporters demand parity, detractors label it hate speech.
Beyond the noise, Dhimaan’s critique underscores a deeper malaise: perceived erosion of secular equity. With elections looming and communal fault lines active, his words could sway narratives. The judiciary, ever stoic, may soon address these claims head-on, but for now, Dhimaan’s voice echoes loudest in the digital town square.