The Delhi Legislative Assembly witnessed high drama as Speaker Vijender Gupta ruled the police FIR against BJP MLA Kapil Mishra an infringement on members’ privilege. Mishra’s pointed remarks against AAP’s administration during a debate triggered the complaint, leading to swift police registration.
Gupta meticulously outlined the breach, referencing Article 194 of the Constitution that shields legislators from prosecution over house speeches. He has summoned the police commissioner for clarification and hinted at potential privilege motion if unresolved. Mishra had highlighted AAP’s failures in flood management and road repairs, backed by data from recent audits.
Reactions poured in sharply. AAP accused the speaker of partisanship, demanding an apology from Mishra. BJP leaders praised Gupta for upholding institutional integrity. This development could set precedents for handling similar cases nationwide.
Beyond the immediate clash, it exposes vulnerabilities in Delhi’s governance model, where assembly oversight often collides with executive actions. As stakeholders await next steps, the public watches closely, hoping for resolution without further politicization.