A surprising UN Human Rights Council vote saw India siding with Iran against Western condemnation of its protest crackdowns. Ambassador Mohammad Fathali thanked India profusely, calling its support a bulwark for sovereignty and justice.
Triggered by December 28 demonstrations, the resolution accused Iran of brutality against civilians. Backed by France, Germany, Spain, UK, and even Argentina and Chile, it failed to sway India. Voting no with six others, India dismissed it as biased politics. Final count: 25-7-14.
Fathali’s X post captured the moment: heartfelt thanks for opposing the ‘unjust’ text, embodying India’s multilateral ethos. This aligns with New Delhi’s doctrine against internal interference—a red line in its playbook.
The vote reveals fault lines. Western unity crumbled against Global South resistance. India’s no also grouped it with China and Pakistan, highlighting pragmatic diplomacy over ideology.
Broader context: With US trade wars looming via tariffs, India flexed independence. No bending to pressure, whether on human rights or economics. Iran, a vital oil supplier and Chabahar partner, benefits directly.
Observers note this as India’s multipolar pivot. Rejecting selective outrage—silent on others’ abuses—it champions equity. Fathali’s nod boosts bilateral momentum.
In sum, India’s UN stance recalibrates alliances, signaling to the West: respect sovereignty or lose influence. A new era dawns in international relations.