Karnataka police get a new playbook for social media skirmishes. The state’s government, via a directive from DGP-IGP M.A. Salim, mandates probes before FIRs to halt the rash of automatic registrations and detentions. This counters the trend of officers bypassing Supreme Court-approved Telangana HC protocols in post-driven cases.
Breakdown of mandates: Scrutinize complainant credentials, probe cognizables upfront, heighten bars for expression/media/politics, protect critique, reclassify defamation as non-FIR territory, follow arrest SOPs, review sensitive files legally, and dismiss vexatious filings.
Defamation FIRs? Only if complainant’s truly aggrieved—no third-party meddling sans cognizable elements. All cases need initial sifting for essential crime ingredients. Serious accusations like fanning hostility, outraging modesty, unrest, or sedition require hard evidence of violence inducement or public peril.
Blanket bans on FIRs for acerbic politics unless they scream imminent threat or breach order. Article 19(1)(a) fortifies free speech. Defamation routes to magistrates; police act solely per BNSS 174(2) warrants.
These guidelines mark a pivotal reform, promoting inquiry-driven policing that respects rights while tackling real threats in India’s vibrant online sphere.