The central government’s initiative to place Chandigarh under Article 240 of the Constitution has ignited an unprecedented political uproar in Punjab. Major political parties in the state have voiced strong opposition, viewing the move as a deliberate attempt to alter the administrative status of Chandigarh and challenge Punjab’s long-standing territorial claims.
According to official parliamentary information, the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill 2025 is set to be presented during the Winter Session commencing December 1. This amendment would vest the power to create regulations for Chandigarh directly with the President, effectively removing the current administrative link with Punjab. It’s crucial to note that Chandigarh is currently not governed by Article 240, which applies to other Union Territories like Andaman and Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep.
The city was established as a Union Territory in 1966 following the bifurcation of Punjab and has since served as the joint capital for both Punjab and Haryana, overseen by an administrator who is also the Governor of Punjab.
Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann condemned the proposal as a “conspiracy to snatch” the capital. He firmly stated, “Chandigarh was, is and will always remain an integral part of Punjab,” highlighting the state’s sacrifices in building the city and vowing to protect its rights.
Arvind Kejriwal, AAP’s national convener, described the action as an “attack on Punjab’s identity.” He emphasized that Chandigarh is unequivocally Punjab’s and will remain so, acknowledging Punjab’s significant contributions to the nation.
Punjab Congress chief Amarinder Singh Raja Warring labeled the move “uncalled for” and cautioned against “serious repercussions,” predicting substantial resistance if the government proceeds. The Shiromani Akali Dal, through leader Sukhbir Singh Badal, also pledged to oppose the bill vigorously, deeming it an “anti-Punjab Bill” and a violation of federal principles.