Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Maharashtra Shaken: Ajit Pawar Survives Fiery Plane Crash in Baramati
    • BSE Sensex Soars 500 pts as India-EU Trade Deal Lifts Mood
    • 4th T20 Spotlight: Samson Under Scanner vs NZ
    • Why Chinmayi Calls Arijit Singh ‘Spiritually Evolved’ After Playback Exit
    • PM Modi at NCC Rally: Inspiring Youth on Duty and Discipline
    • Rain and Winds Cut NCR Pollution: AQI Dips, Cold Wave Looms
    • One Bad Day Can End It All: Dravid Cautions Team India on WC Eve
    • President Murmu Opens Budget Session in Parliament Today
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Report Wire
    • World
    • India
      • Chhattisgarh
      • Jharkhand
      • Bihar
    • Entertainment
    • Sports
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Health
    Report Wire
    Home»India»Jharkhand»Important points during the hearing of Chhavi Ranjan’s case in the High Court

    Important points during the hearing of Chhavi Ranjan’s case in the High Court

    Jharkhand March 1, 20242 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Important points during the hearing of Chhavi Ranjan’s case in the High Court
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Ranchi: Hearing in the case from Army land, case related to former DC of Ranchi Chhavi Ranjan, hearing held in High Court, hearing on the bail of suspended IAS Chhavi Ranjan was held in Jharkhand High Court, after hearing both the sides, the court gave its decision. During the reserved High Court hearing, ED did not have answers on many points. During the hearing, the court verbally asked the ED advocate as to how the accused is involved in money laundering. The petitioner ordered an investigation but no one has given any statement anywhere that the petitioner was aware of the deed being forged. Therefore mens rea does not exist. Ordering an investigation in administrative capacity does not constitute a case of money laundering. Jayant Karnard was also found to have fake honour. In the investigation, the role of many people was also suspected but ED conducted the investigation one-sidedly. ED could not tell in the investigation what role the petitioner played in money laundering. On the other hand, the ED advocate highlighted the main points of the PC and informed the court. The court asked what was the role of the petitioner in money laundering and POC laundering. On which the points mentioned by ED in PC were repeated. Advocates Inderjit Sinha and Abhishek Chaudhary argued on behalf of Chhavi Ranjan. This case was heard in the court of High Court judge Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    RELATED NEWS

    77th Republic Day Celebrated at IIIT Ranchi, National Flag Hoisted by Director Prof. Rajiv Srivastava

    January 28, 2026

    Jealous Rage Ends in Cousin Murder: Dumka Police Nab Killer

    January 27, 2026

    JMM Unhappy with Padma Bhushan for Shibu Soren, Wants Bharat Ratna Instead

    January 25, 2026

    Former Ranchi Councilor Suman Devi Rallies Ward 39 for Municipal Elections

    January 25, 2026

    Jharkhand Politics Heats Up: Akil Akhtar Bolsters AIMIM Ranks

    January 25, 2026

    Heartbreak in Ranchi: Martyr Ajay’s Village Mourns Lost Dreams

    January 25, 2026
    -Advertisement-
    © 2026 Report Wire. All Rights Reserved.
    • Terms & Conditions
    • About Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.