Monday marks a pivotal moment for Lalu Prasad Yadav’s family as Delhi High Court examines their petitions against IRCTC hotels tender scam prosecution. The case, mired in legal wrangles for years, spotlights alleged favoritism during UPA’s railway ministry stewardship.
Key allegations involve manipulation of bid processes favoring companies connected to Rabri Devi and kin. The ED claims ₹60 lakh kickbacks flowed through circuitous routes involving shell entities in Bihar.
Petitioners contest ED’s money trail reconstruction and challenge witness statements as coerced. They seek discharge from all charges and vacation of asset freezes imposed recently.
Recall that a Delhi court rejected their anticipatory bail pleas earlier, citing flight risk and evidence tampering concerns. The high court intervention becomes their last resort before trial commencement.
Amidst Bihar’s charged political atmosphere, this hearing assumes added importance. RJD positions itself as NDA’s principal challenger, with Lalu as symbolic leader despite health-related bail.
Legal fraternity expects comprehensive review of PMLA provisions application. Precedents from similar political cases may guide judicial pronouncements.
The verdict holds implications for corruption accountability in public contracts. Whatever the outcome, it reinforces judiciary’s role in balancing investigative zeal with individual rights.