The massive turnouts at actor Vijay’s rallies in Tamil Nadu reflect the star’s growing influence. In a state where film personalities often dominate the political landscape, Vijay’s entry has captured attention. His campaign launch in Nagercoil, which included criticism of Chief Minister MK Stalin, has generated further discussion.
While Vijay’s supporters are enthusiastic, political analysts are offering more tempered assessments. Dr. Sumanth C Raman suggests that Vijay will likely take some votes from the DMK’s secular base, but the party’s existing lead is considerable. The main impact of Vijay’s presence is expected to be on the AIADMK, potentially splitting the anti-DMK vote.
This could inadvertently benefit the DMK. Although Stalin has questioned Vijay’s ideological convictions and experience, the ruling party is not particularly worried. Prof. Ramu Manivannan points out the challenges for film stars in politics. He notes that leaders like MG Ramachandran and M. Karunanidhi worked tirelessly before achieving political success.
Vijay’s primary role may be dividing the opposition vote. He is targeting voters who are not inclined to support the DMK. This fragmentation could inadvertently aid the DMK. The DMK is keen to ensure that the anti-incumbency factor is not exacerbated by Vijay’s presence.
The BJP, allied with the AIADMK, lags behind the DMK-led coalition. Given the presence of anti-incumbency sentiment, a vote-splitter like Vijay may actually benefit the DMK. The party’s focus on Tamil pride and other regional issues has proven effective in the past, aided by a strong campaign strategy and media backing. While the DMK appears prepared for the upcoming elections, the coming months will be crucial as they face a new challenge from Vijay and his political party, TVK.