AIMIM MLA refuses to sing National tune in Bihar Assembly

AIMIM MLA Akhtarul Iman, who had raised objection to ‘Hindustan’ written in his affidavit throughout the oath-taking ceremony of the seventeenth state meeting of Bihar, has as soon as once more courted controversy after he raised an objection to India’s nationwide tune ‘Vande Mataram’. Reportedly Iman, who can also be the Bihar State president of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen celebration, on Friday refused to sing the National tune ‘Vande Mataram’ over the last day of the Bihar meeting winter session, calling it ‘against his faith and religion’.
As a part of the Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav celebrations, a brand new custom was began throughout the present winter session of the Bihar Legislative Assembly. The nationwide anthem (Jana Gana Mana) was sung by all of the legislators at first of the winter session and at present the nationwide tune (Vande Mataram) was sung throughout the concluding day.
Speaking to the media, the AIMIM Bihar president questioned why it was necessary to sing the nationwide tune and mentioned that whereas he had nothing towards singing the nationwide tune, saying ‘Vande Mataram’ was towards his faith.
“Every individual person has his own likes and dislikes. I cannot be forced to say Vande Mataram”, mentioned Iman. Iman sought to know the rationale for reciting the nationwide tune or nationwide anthem each time. “Who said it is necessary”, Iman questioned reporters exterior the Bihar Assembly.
#Bihar: AIMIM MLA Akhtarul Islam sparks controversy by refusing to sing ‘Vande Mataram on the last day of Bihar assembly session; says it has been ‘imposed’.Saket with evaluation. pic.twitter.com/Du4pIsq31w— TIMES NOW (@TimesNow) December 3, 2021
“It is not necessary to sing the national song without any reason. Nothing like this is said in the constitution. I have a problem in singing the national song i.e. Vande Mataram. It is related to our faith. Some are veg some are non-veg. You will run the same stick on everyone. This doesn’t happen. I don’t sing Vande Mataram and will not,” he added.
The Asaduddin Owaisi’s celebration MLA mentioned that the Speaker of the Bihar Assembly is forcibly imposing this custom. He added that he has religion within the structure of India however have objections over reciting ‘Vande Mataram’.
When a reporter requested Iman if not singing the nationwide tune was ‘anti-national’ (desh-droh), he replied: “Who said this? Who said this jumla? Will you say anything from the top of your head? Who has given you the right to say this? The nation does not run based on your claims. We follow our Constitution. Those who drafted the Constitution were far more intelligent than us. They have given us the full right to spread love and follow our religion.”
The AIMIM MLA’s response towards the National tune has attracted sharp criticism from the opposite MLAs, who opined that an individual who has objection to the National tune is anti-national and doesn’t deserve to remain within the nation.
“It is a matter of pride for all Indians to sing the National Song. Such people live here, eat and drink here but have problems with the country National Song. These people have a Jihadist mindset who want to divide India,” mentioned BJP MLA Haribhushan Thakur (Bachol), including that the speaker ought to take motion towards the AIMIM MLA.
BJP senior chief Sanjay Singh opined that the assertion of the AIMIM MLA clearly reveals his intention. “It’s a matter of concern that lawmakers are refusing to recite the national song or national anthem. That means they have scant respect and honour for the nation’s democratic set-up,” Singh added.
AIMIM MLA refuses to say ‘Hindustan’ throughout the oath-taking ceremony
It could also be recalled that Akhtarul Iman is similar AIMIM MLA who had triggered an argument final 12 months when he introduced that he objects to the phrase ‘Hindustan’ written in his affidavit.
“I had raised no objections. I had simply made a point that whenever we read the Preamble of the Constitution, in whichever language, it mentions the word ‘Bharat’ and not ‘Hindustan’. In the light of this fact I felt that since we are taking oath in the name of the Constitution, it would be proper if use the same term for the name of our country,” Akhtarul Iman claimed.
His feedback didn’t go down effectively with many different MLAs. BJP chief Pramod Kumar had rebuked the AIMIM chief by saying that those that have an issue with the phrase ‘Hindustan’, can go to Pakistan.