Congress chief Furkan Ansari claims Yadavs grew to become Muslims as a result of love of Aurangzeb
3 min read
In the course of spinning the leftist jihadi narrative, former Congress MP Furkan Ansari threw logic out of the window. He stated that Indian Muslims had been truly Yadavs (a Hindu caste thought-about to be Lord Krishna’s lineage) who transformed as a result of atrocities meted out by feudalism.
According to the Congress chief, this conversion was not compelled by Aurangzeb nor by means of power, however it was love that received them over.
फुरकान अंसारी ने कहा कि हमलोग यादव से मुस्लिम बने है।
झारखंड कांग्रेस के विधायक इरफान अंसारी के पिता और पूर्व सांसद फुरक़ान अंसारी ने कहा है कि उनके पूर्वज यादव और मण्डल थे।फुरकान अंसारी ने कहा हमलोग यादव से मुस्लिम बने है। pic.twitter.com/6ZN1W2jlPv
— Sohan singh (@sohansingh05) June 13, 2023
In a press release devoid of rationale, the previous MP from Godda managed to contradict himself too. He stated, “The converted Muslims, we Muslims who have converted, were Yadavs before. Our grandfathers, great-grandfathers were Yadavs, some were Mandals.”
Ansari provides, “The Madariya community are all Mandals. We (Muslims) have converted from Mandal, Mahto, and Yadavs. Why? Because of the atrocities by feudal lords, because of their atrocities. Aurangzeb has not converted us. This has not happened with the use of the sword. People won our hearts ethically and with love and we became Miyaan (Muslims).”
Furkan Ansari went on to say that their (Muslim) ancestors had been tortured beneath Hinduism.
“Capitalists used to stop our forefathers from going to temples. The respect of our daughters-in-law was in danger. That’s why our great-grandfathers were forced to convert,” Ansari claimed.
In the method, unsurprisingly, Ansari additionally peddled faux information. “Under the Modi govt, after a Dalit President visited a mandir, five tankers of Gangajal was brought to clean the mandir.” Despite being uncovered and fact-checked, this creatively woven net of lies continues to function the muse for Hindu haters.
Babulal Maradi fact-checks Furkan Ansari
Former Jharkhand CM and chief of opposition Babulal Marandi took to Twitter to fact-check Furkan Ansari.
He wrote, “Furkan ji was earlier a Hindu ‘Yadav’. Then he became a Muslim ‘Ansari’ (weaver) when persecuted by feudal lords. Ashrafi feudal lords (Sheikh, Syed, Pathan) do not even like to sit and eat with the weavers. Furkan ji is trapped. Where will you go now?”
फुरकान जी पहले हिंदू “यादव” थे।फिर सामंतियों ने सताया तो मुस्लिम “अंसारी” (जुलाहा) बन गए।अशरफी सामंती (शेख, सैयद, पठान) जुलाहों के साथ बैठना – खाना तक पसंद नहीं करते हैं।फुरकान जी फंस गए हैं कि अब कहाँ जाएंगे।
फुरकान जी बहुत मासूम और भोले आदमी हैं, मैं उनका बहुत सम्मान करता हूँ। pic.twitter.com/XNcZE669G7
— Babulal Marandi (@yourBabulal) June 13, 2023
It have to be identified that the Muslim group is split into a number of layers of castes with two castes being probably the most dominant specifically Ashraf (descendants of Arabs) and Ajlaf (native converts).
Controversy over Aurangzeb
Furkan Ansari’s try at scoring brownie factors comes amid a heated controversy over Mughal emperor Aurangzeb. On June 5, objectionable slogans and posters of jihadi tyrant Aurangzeb had been raised by 4 individuals at Dam Bara Hazari Baba dargah in Fakirwada space of Ahmednagar.
Then, after messages had been being made viral hailing the Mughal ruler, Hindu teams on June 7 carried out a peaceable march in Sangamner and Kolhapur in opposition to the identical however had been met with large-scale stone pelting, violence, and arson.
In a flimsy defence of Aurangzeb’s jihadi fanbase, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi speaking concerning the posters had requested if the posters of the tyrant may even be authenticated.
In May 2022, his brother Akbaruddin Owaisi had paid respects to Aurangzeb at his tomb in Chhatrapati Shivajinagar
Earlier, NCP neta Jitendra Awhad too defended Aurangzeb saying that he was not a Hindu hater.
Here’s why shielding Aurangzeb is like rubbing salt within the wounds of Hindus and a blatant insult to the victims of his manic hatred for Hindus.
