Right to Information Act 2005: A effective of twenty 5 thousand rupees to a public data officer who doesn’t present data on time

State Information Commissioner of Chhattisgarh State Information Commission, Mr. Dhanvendra Jaiswal has imposed a effective of twenty 5 thousand rupees on 4 public data officers for not following the Right to Information Act and never offering data on time. Director Panchayat and Rural Development Department has been instructed to gather the quantity of effective from the involved and deposit it within the authorities treasury and directions for disciplinary motion in opposition to the then Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Korba below Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act 2005. have been given.

The Right to Information Act is a significant effort to enhance the functioning of the federal government and officers and convey transparency. Right to Information can be a historic step to manage corruption within the nation and management pink tape amongst officers. For a wholesome democracy, it’s needed for the workplace bearers to be accountable to their posts. Such a provision has been made by way of this Act, below which any citizen can get data relating to the actions of the general public authority. If the data just isn’t supplied by the Public Information Officer in time to the involved, then such officers may be punished by the State Information Commission constituted by the State Government.

Under the Right to Information Act, Shri Sharad Devangan, Shri Ram Colony, Beladula Raigad, in his utility dated 25 January 2018 from the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Korba (Public Information Officer), the listing of Assistant Teacher (Panchayat), Teacher (Panchayat) posted in District Korba. Attested photocopy of But after not getting the specified data on time, he utilized to the First Appellate Authority on 28 February 2018. The first appellate authority didn’t give any determination on this case, as a result of which aggrieved, he appealed to the Chhattisgarh State Information Commission.

State Information Commissioner Shri Dhanvendra Jaiswal, after listening to the appellant and the Public Information Officer below the Act, didn’t present data to the appellant throughout the time restrict and didn’t submit any reply within the Commission in addition to not responding to the letters of the Commission. Taking this critically, the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Korba (then Public Information Officer) Shri GR Banjare below part 20(1) with a effective of Rs.25 thousand in addition to below part 20(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Under Collector Korba and Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Korba, it has been directed that the then Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Korba (present Public Information Officer) Shri G.R. After recovering the quantity from the wage/pension of Banjare and depositing it within the authorities treasury, inform the fee. Director Panchayat and Rural Development Department has been directed to take disciplinary motion in opposition to the First Appellate Officer (Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat) below Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act 2005.

Like this:

Like Loading…

Continue Reading