The first spouse has the appropriate to file prison instances in opposition to the husband and spouse who remarry with out divorce, the ladies’s fee heard 84 instances in 4 days, in two instances, the husband and spouse agreed on the circumstances

In the presence of State Women’s Commission Chairperson Dr. Kiranmayi Nayak and members Smt. Anita Raote, Ms. Shashikanta Rathore and Smt. Archana Upadhyay, on the fourth day immediately, on the fourth day, the State Women’s Commission Office, situated at Shastri Chowk, was heard for redressal of complaints associated to girls.
During the listening to immediately, in a case, the spouse has carried out second marriage in opposition to her husband with out taking divorce from the applicant. In immediately’s listening to, the second spouse and each the elder brothers of the husband additionally appeared. Both the brothers advised that the appellant has made a mistake and has married the second and doesn’t give any upkeep to the primary spouse. The appellant lives within the household home the place the appellant His father and brother additionally reside. In this case, within the social assembly, the appellant and the entire household had determined that half of the share within the father’s property can be given to the applicant and each the brothers helped in getting the share of the husband’s property. In this case, 494 I.B. will likely be filed in opposition to the appellant and the second spouse. The. Sections of V. could be registered. Whenever the applicant desires, she will be able to file a report in opposition to each of them within the police station. At this stage, the applicant made a requirement for her upkeep earlier than the fee. On which the appellant and the second spouse accepted that other than residing of their home, the appellant would deposit Rs.6 thousand per thirty days within the checking account recurrently for residing. If the delay in giving upkeep quantity is completed by the applicant in any month, then the applicant can file a report within the police station.

Similarly, in two instances, the husband and spouse introduced their situation in writing to the fee. On the premise of which an try was made to enhance the connection between husband and spouse within the fee, they agreed to reside collectively on the recommendation of the fee. Both the instances had been dismissed.
In one other case, the appellant had been accused by her lifeless husband of SECL. Was working in Melwadih of Coal Mines. After whose demise utilized for compassionate appointment ex-gratia quantity. SECL for ultimate settlement of this matter. It is important to make sure the presence of the senior officer of the General Manager and make him a celebration within the case. With this course, the matter was positioned within the subsequent listening to. In one other case, the petitioners have submitted a criticism in opposition to the appellant for land grabbing and dishonest within the fee. The appellant sought time for his reply. The petitioners have utilized within the Commission concerning bogus entry by the appellant within the receipt of quantity within the again a part of the settlement settlement between the 2 events through the lifetime of the applicant’s husband. In this regard, each the events had been suggested by the fee. In which each the events had been requested to submit all their paperwork mentioning level clever. So {that a} method of reconciliation could be discovered between the 2. So that the matter could be resolved.
In these 4 days, 84 instances associated to harassment of girls had been put up for listening to earlier than the Women’s Commission.

Like this:

Like Loading…

Continue Reading