Report Wire

Tag: AIMPLB

  • ‘Against the spirit of the Constitution’: AIMPLB passes decision towards Uniform Civil Code

    By Express News Service

    LUCKNOW: After an emergency assembly on Sunday, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) expressed concern over ‘rising hatred’ within the society and issued an enchantment to the Government of India to not pursue the ‘agenda of introducing a Uniform Civil Code (UCC). It mentioned it could deprive residents of the privileges supplied to them by Personal Laws and that was towards the spirit of the Constitution.

    The government physique of the board mentioned in its decision that implementing UCC was neither related nor helpful for a multi-religious, multi-cultural and multi-lingual nation like India. “If, taking advantage of its majority in Parliament, the ruling government passes and puts into effect the Uniform Civil Code, it will affect the unity and harmony that bind the nation. It will hinder the country’s progress and will not bear any fruitful results either,” mentioned the decision shared by AIMPLB basic secretary Maulana Khalid Saif Ullah Rahmani on Sunday.

    Members of the AIMPLB government physique, led by Maulana Rabey Hasan Nadwi of Darul Uloom Nadwat ul Ulama, Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahli, MP Asaduddin Owaisi, and others reiterated that for hundreds of years India had thrived on the power of integrity and amity amongst populations comprising innumerable religions, castes and factions, thus upholding the values vested within the Constitution of India.

    Touching one other delicate challenge, the chief physique of the board deliberated upon the Places of Worship Act-1991. The decision mentioned that the Places of Worship Act 1991 was handed by the Parliament and so was the obligation of the Government of India to make sure its correct implementation.

    “It is in the national interest. Otherwise, it could lead to endless differences among various religious groups. The government must not surrender to the separatist powers and should responsibly safeguard the legal interests of all,” mentioned the board within the decision handed on the assembly.

    The government physique additionally appealed to the best authorities to place stringent measures in place to regulate “communal hatred” being unfold throughout the nation earlier than “irreparable damage was done to the fabric of social harmony.”

    “Discord, being created, on the path of unity and inclusiveness that was followed by our freedom fighters and makers of the Constitution is opposed,” mentioned the decision handed by the chief physique.

    The decision handed by the members additional claimed that lawlessness was prevailing within the nation and accused had been being implicated even earlier than the prosecution and litigation.

    “Houses built for decades are getting razed. Those holding peaceful demonstrations are framed under the most stringent of laws and are put behind the bars indefinitely. Lawlessness, whether on the part of the citizens or the rulers, is condemnable and all citizens and stakeholders must oppose it strongly.”

    Expressing its views over the anti-conversion legal guidelines enacted in varied states together with Uttar Pradesh and different BJP-ruled states, the board mentioned: “Religion and faith are matters of belief and conscience. Constitution honours this as a fundamental right and so everyone has the freedom to follow a religion of his choice. It is unfair to use force or money to influence an individual in this matter. However, in many states, laws have been made as to deprive citizens of this very basic right. This is totally unacceptable. Yet, those who willingly choose to switch from one religion to another are free to do so.”

    The AIMPLB additionally appealed to the judiciary of the nation to take critical be aware of injustice being meted out to the weaker sections of society and the minorities. It additionally claimed that Waqfs had been non secular properties established by Muslims for the welfare of the group. It was illegal for any citizen or authorities to seize waqf properties.

    “The AIMPLB strongly opposes statements by some public representatives instigating action to deprive Muslims of their waqf properties and appeals to the government to beware of such actions. The Board advises Muslims to take the best and most responsible care of waqf properties. They are also advised to use the waqf properties as much as possible for educational purposes,” mentioned the decision.

    The Board, which had opposed the legislation enacted towards triple talaq, additionally introduced the difficulty into its discourse saying: “Nikahnaama authorized by AIMPLB must be used to seal a matrimonial alliance. In the Board’s nikahnama, the rights and duties of husband and wife are enumerated with clarity and thus they cut out the incidence of dispute or divorce. Thus, disputes can be resolved with minimum time, effort and money.” It added: “Muslims ought to resolve their points by turning first to the non secular heads for recommendation. Intoxication, adultery, curiosity in homosexuality, and persevering with to reside with a divorced partner are practices that don’t befit a real Muslim, nor are enforced by the nation’s legislation.”

    LUCKNOW: After an emergency assembly on Sunday, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) expressed concern over ‘rising hatred’ within the society and issued an enchantment to the Government of India to not pursue the ‘agenda of introducing a Uniform Civil Code (UCC). It mentioned it could deprive residents of the privileges supplied to them by Personal Laws and that was towards the spirit of the Constitution.

    The government physique of the board mentioned in its decision that implementing UCC was neither related nor helpful for a multi-religious, multi-cultural and multi-lingual nation like India. “If, taking advantage of its majority in Parliament, the ruling government passes and puts into effect the Uniform Civil Code, it will affect the unity and harmony that bind the nation. It will hinder the country’s progress and will not bear any fruitful results either,” mentioned the decision shared by AIMPLB basic secretary Maulana Khalid Saif Ullah Rahmani on Sunday.

    Members of the AIMPLB government physique, led by Maulana Rabey Hasan Nadwi of Darul Uloom Nadwat ul Ulama, Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahli, MP Asaduddin Owaisi, and others reiterated that for hundreds of years India had thrived on the power of integrity and amity amongst populations comprising innumerable religions, castes and factions, thus upholding the values vested within the Constitution of India.

    Touching one other delicate challenge, the chief physique of the board deliberated upon the Places of Worship Act-1991. The decision mentioned that the Places of Worship Act 1991 was handed by the Parliament and so was the obligation of the Government of India to make sure its correct implementation.

    “It is in the national interest. Otherwise, it could lead to endless differences among various religious groups. The government must not surrender to the separatist powers and should responsibly safeguard the legal interests of all,” mentioned the board within the decision handed on the assembly.

    The government physique additionally appealed to the best authorities to place stringent measures in place to regulate “communal hatred” being unfold throughout the nation earlier than “irreparable damage was done to the fabric of social harmony.”

    “Discord, being created, on the path of unity and inclusiveness that was followed by our freedom fighters and makers of the Constitution is opposed,” mentioned the decision handed by the chief physique.

    The decision handed by the members additional claimed that lawlessness was prevailing within the nation and accused had been being implicated even earlier than the prosecution and litigation.

    “Houses built for decades are getting razed. Those holding peaceful demonstrations are framed under the most stringent of laws and are put behind the bars indefinitely. Lawlessness, whether on the part of the citizens or the rulers, is condemnable and all citizens and stakeholders must oppose it strongly.”

    Expressing its views over the anti-conversion legal guidelines enacted in varied states together with Uttar Pradesh and different BJP-ruled states, the board mentioned: “Religion and faith are matters of belief and conscience. Constitution honours this as a fundamental right and so everyone has the freedom to follow a religion of his choice. It is unfair to use force or money to influence an individual in this matter. However, in many states, laws have been made as to deprive citizens of this very basic right. This is totally unacceptable. Yet, those who willingly choose to switch from one religion to another are free to do so.”

    The AIMPLB additionally appealed to the judiciary of the nation to take critical be aware of injustice being meted out to the weaker sections of society and the minorities. It additionally claimed that Waqfs had been non secular properties established by Muslims for the welfare of the group. It was illegal for any citizen or authorities to seize waqf properties.

    “The AIMPLB strongly opposes statements by some public representatives instigating action to deprive Muslims of their waqf properties and appeals to the government to beware of such actions. The Board advises Muslims to take the best and most responsible care of waqf properties. They are also advised to use the waqf properties as much as possible for educational purposes,” mentioned the decision.

    The Board, which had opposed the legislation enacted towards triple talaq, additionally introduced the difficulty into its discourse saying: “Nikahnaama authorized by AIMPLB must be used to seal a matrimonial alliance. In the Board’s nikahnama, the rights and duties of husband and wife are enumerated with clarity and thus they cut out the incidence of dispute or divorce. Thus, disputes can be resolved with minimum time, effort and money.” It added: “Muslims ought to resolve their points by turning first to the non secular heads for recommendation. Intoxication, adultery, curiosity in homosexuality, and persevering with to reside with a divorced partner are practices that don’t befit a real Muslim, nor are enforced by the nation’s legislation.”

  • Babri Masjid demolition case: AIMPLB to maneuver SC in opposition to CBI court docket acquittal of 32 accused

    By PTI

    AYODHYA: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) will transfer the Supreme Court in opposition to a CBI particular court docket acquittal of all of the 32 accused within the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition case, an official of the board mentioned on Wednesday.

    The CBI court docket had on September 30, 2020 acquitted the accused together with former deputy prime minister L Ok Advani within the case after which two Ayodhya residents — Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq — moved a revision petition earlier than the Allahabad High Court.

    A two-judge bench of the High Court rejected the revision petition on November 9 this 12 months, saying the appellants had no locus to problem the judgment as they weren’t victims of the case.

    AIMPLB government member and spokesperson Syed Qasil Rasool Ilyas mentioned the board has now determined to maneuver the Supreme Court in opposition to the acquittal.

    “We are certainly going to approach the Supreme Court as the apex court in the Ayodhya Verdict itself has accepted that the demolition of Babri Masjid was a criminal act,” he informed PTI.

    “The five-judge Supreme Court bench that delivered the historic Ayodhya verdict had termed the Babri Masjid destruction a serious violation of the rule of law and the accused are still out of the reach of Law,” he added.

    He mentioned appellants Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq have been CBI witnesses and their homes have been attacked and burnt on December 6, 1992 by a mob that was gathered by the accused.

    He mentioned Mahboob and Akhlaq lived within the shut neighborhood of Babri Masjid.

    Mahboob and Akhlaq had moved the High Court on January 8, 2021 in opposition to the CBI Court judgement.

    While rejecting the petition, the High Court mentioned in its order, “In view of the foregoing discussion, this Court is of the opinion that the instant criminal appeal filed on behalf of the appellants under Section 372 Cr.P.C., under the facts and circumstances of the case, is liable to be dismissed on the ground of non-availability of the locus of the appellants to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated September, 30, 2020 passed by the trial Court, hence the same is, accordingly, dismissed.”

    AYODHYA: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) will transfer the Supreme Court in opposition to a CBI particular court docket acquittal of all of the 32 accused within the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition case, an official of the board mentioned on Wednesday.

    The CBI court docket had on September 30, 2020 acquitted the accused together with former deputy prime minister L Ok Advani within the case after which two Ayodhya residents — Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq — moved a revision petition earlier than the Allahabad High Court.

    A two-judge bench of the High Court rejected the revision petition on November 9 this 12 months, saying the appellants had no locus to problem the judgment as they weren’t victims of the case.

    AIMPLB government member and spokesperson Syed Qasil Rasool Ilyas mentioned the board has now determined to maneuver the Supreme Court in opposition to the acquittal.

    “We are certainly going to approach the Supreme Court as the apex court in the Ayodhya Verdict itself has accepted that the demolition of Babri Masjid was a criminal act,” he informed PTI.

    “The five-judge Supreme Court bench that delivered the historic Ayodhya verdict had termed the Babri Masjid destruction a serious violation of the rule of law and the accused are still out of the reach of Law,” he added.

    He mentioned appellants Haji Mahboob and Syed Akhlaq have been CBI witnesses and their homes have been attacked and burnt on December 6, 1992 by a mob that was gathered by the accused.

    He mentioned Mahboob and Akhlaq lived within the shut neighborhood of Babri Masjid.

    Mahboob and Akhlaq had moved the High Court on January 8, 2021 in opposition to the CBI Court judgement.

    While rejecting the petition, the High Court mentioned in its order, “In view of the foregoing discussion, this Court is of the opinion that the instant criminal appeal filed on behalf of the appellants under Section 372 Cr.P.C., under the facts and circumstances of the case, is liable to be dismissed on the ground of non-availability of the locus of the appellants to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated September, 30, 2020 passed by the trial Court, hence the same is, accordingly, dismissed.”

  • AIMPLB alleges bias towards madrassas in BJP-ruled states

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has expressed concern over the alleged concentrating on of madrassas by the BJP-led central and state governments and requested why similar guidelines don’t apply for different spiritual establishments resembling mutts, gurukuls and dharmshalas.

    In an announcement, AIMPLB common secretary Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani alleged that the governments of a celebration, which is influenced by the RSS, on the Centre and in some states had been having a adverse strategy in the direction of minorities, particularly the Muslim neighborhood.

    “When a party influenced by a certain thought comes to power, it is expected that its approach will be unbiased and within the frame of our Constitution,” he stated.

    Rahmani stated Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself has spoken in parliament and different locations concerning the significance of legislation and order however numerous state governments the place the BJP is in energy, their angle is the alternative.

    “The way in which BJP governments in Assam and UP have been after the madrassas over very small violations and are targeting the madrassas by closing, bulldozing them and even harassing people working in the madrasas and masjids by alleging that they were terrorists without any reason,” he stated, based on an announcement issued on Thursday.

    Also, outstanding folks coming from outdoors the nation must face bans and restrictions, which is a gross violation of the Constitution, he stated.

    “If bulldozing buildings is the only option for any violation then why don’t they take a similar approach for gurukuls, mutts and dharmshalas as they do in the case of madrassas and mosques,” Rahmani requested.

    It appears that the federal government is doing issues at its personal will and never following what’s written within the Constitution, he alleged.

    The Muslim Personal Law Board condemns such a biased strategy and requests governments to observe what’s written within the Constitution and practise it with endurance, he added.

    The assertion got here after the Uttar Pradesh authorities on Wednesday introduced a survey of unrecognised madrassas within the state to collect details about the variety of academics, curriculum, and primary amenities out there there, amongst others.

    Meanwhile, the Assam authorities’s ongoing drive to demolish madrassas for his or her connection to alleged “‘jihadi activities” has drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition, which has termed the train as “totally illegal” and focused at “one partcular community”.

    Three madrassas have been demolished by the BJP authorities throughout the final one month in numerous components of the state after arresting their academics, who had been discovered to be allegedly concerned in “jihadi” actions.

    However, on every event the official purpose for bringing down the constructions are associated to defective development or violation of land norms as an alternative of any hyperlink with jihadi actions.

    It is barely the political leaders from the ruling dispensation who often give statements within the media that the madrassas have been demolished for allegedly finishing up jihadi actions from their premises.

    The administration bulldozed madrassas at Moirabari in Morigaon district on August 4, at Dhakaliapara in Barpeta on August 29 and at Jogighopa in Bongaigaon on August 31.

    “The Moirabari madrassa was demolished after a notice was sent to it saying that the building was small and the electricity connection was illegal. The one at Dhakaliapara one was demolished as it was on government land,” All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya secretary Abdul Kadir instructed PTI.

    The two-storeyed residential madrassa at Jogighopa was razed to the bottom for violating catastrophe norms and the authorities requested the boarders to vacate the premises at 10 pm the earlier evening, he claimed.

    “We have been cooperating with the law enforcing agencies if someone is found doing something wrong. But that does not mean that the entire institution is at fault. What is the point in demolishing an educational centre?” requested Kadir.

    From April 1 final yr, 610 state-run madrassas in Assam had been transformed into higher main, excessive and better secondary colleges with no change of standing, pay, allowances and repair situations for the educating and non-teaching employees.

    Following it, the State Madrassa Education Board, Assam was dissolved and the final Assam High Madrassa examination by the Board of Secondary Education, Assam (SEBA) for Class 10 college students befell in 2022.

    At current, there are about 1,000 non-public madrassas, that are run based on the rules and syllabus of the All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya (AATMQ).

    AATMQ provides common programs until class eight and theology thereafter.

    From this yr these wishing to review common programs for courses 9 and 10 in madrassas will be capable to seem for the exams beneath an open education system with its help.

    Meanwhile, a senior official of the SEBA stated that about 10 non-public madrassas have approached it for changing these into common colleges, which was carried out after following the due course of.

    Opposition senior Congress chief Rakibul Hussain hit out on the Himanta Biswa Sarma authorities for the demolitions, “It is unconstitutional to destroy the madrassas.

    The chief minister stated that the suspected jihadis entered Assam or began their actions throughout the final three yr. If so, then solely the BJP needs to be blamed as they’re in energy since 2016.”

    He additionally alleged that Sarma is making contradictory statements as he had praised the madrassas as centres of spiritualism throughout his days within the Congress, however is now blaming them for anti-social actions.

    Opposition All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) stated that the Assam authorities is “totally wrong” in bulldozing the tutorial centres on the pretext of curbing jihadi actions.

    “If there were something wrong, then rectify those. After all these madrassas are imparting education. Demolishing the madrassas is an expression of hatred against one particular community,” AIUDF MLA Ashraful Hussain stated.

    He additionally stated that Assam state Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, headed by AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal, and AATMQ are contemplating approaching the courtroom towards the demolition of the madrassas.

    CPI(M) state secretary Suprakash Talukdar stated the social gathering is completely towards the demolition of madrassas as arresting a suspect isn’t the ultimate step of the justice supply system.

    “The government is breaking all laws. Who is responsible for demolishing a centre of education? Who will pay for its costs? These are usually constructed with public donations,” he stated.

    “The government has become more intolerant. We have also seen a lot of cases against the alleged jihadi elements. But what is the fate of those cases? Were those accused convicted?” he requested.

    More than 40 folks with suspected hyperlinks to jihadi components, together with Bangladeshi nationals, have been arrested within the state since March this yr.

    NEW DELHI: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has expressed concern over the alleged concentrating on of madrassas by the BJP-led central and state governments and requested why similar guidelines don’t apply for different spiritual establishments resembling mutts, gurukuls and dharmshalas.

    In an announcement, AIMPLB common secretary Maulana Khalid Saifullah Rahmani alleged that the governments of a celebration, which is influenced by the RSS, on the Centre and in some states had been having a adverse strategy in the direction of minorities, particularly the Muslim neighborhood.

    “When a party influenced by a certain thought comes to power, it is expected that its approach will be unbiased and within the frame of our Constitution,” he stated.

    Rahmani stated Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself has spoken in parliament and different locations concerning the significance of legislation and order however numerous state governments the place the BJP is in energy, their angle is the alternative.

    “The way in which BJP governments in Assam and UP have been after the madrassas over very small violations and are targeting the madrassas by closing, bulldozing them and even harassing people working in the madrasas and masjids by alleging that they were terrorists without any reason,” he stated, based on an announcement issued on Thursday.

    Also, outstanding folks coming from outdoors the nation must face bans and restrictions, which is a gross violation of the Constitution, he stated.

    “If bulldozing buildings is the only option for any violation then why don’t they take a similar approach for gurukuls, mutts and dharmshalas as they do in the case of madrassas and mosques,” Rahmani requested.

    It appears that the federal government is doing issues at its personal will and never following what’s written within the Constitution, he alleged.

    The Muslim Personal Law Board condemns such a biased strategy and requests governments to observe what’s written within the Constitution and practise it with endurance, he added.

    The assertion got here after the Uttar Pradesh authorities on Wednesday introduced a survey of unrecognised madrassas within the state to collect details about the variety of academics, curriculum, and primary amenities out there there, amongst others.

    Meanwhile, the Assam authorities’s ongoing drive to demolish madrassas for his or her connection to alleged “‘jihadi activities” has drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition, which has termed the train as “totally illegal” and focused at “one partcular community”.

    Three madrassas have been demolished by the BJP authorities throughout the final one month in numerous components of the state after arresting their academics, who had been discovered to be allegedly concerned in “jihadi” actions.

    However, on every event the official purpose for bringing down the constructions are associated to defective development or violation of land norms as an alternative of any hyperlink with jihadi actions.

    It is barely the political leaders from the ruling dispensation who often give statements within the media that the madrassas have been demolished for allegedly finishing up jihadi actions from their premises.

    The administration bulldozed madrassas at Moirabari in Morigaon district on August 4, at Dhakaliapara in Barpeta on August 29 and at Jogighopa in Bongaigaon on August 31.

    “The Moirabari madrassa was demolished after a notice was sent to it saying that the building was small and the electricity connection was illegal. The one at Dhakaliapara one was demolished as it was on government land,” All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya secretary Abdul Kadir instructed PTI.

    The two-storeyed residential madrassa at Jogighopa was razed to the bottom for violating catastrophe norms and the authorities requested the boarders to vacate the premises at 10 pm the earlier evening, he claimed.

    “We have been cooperating with the law enforcing agencies if someone is found doing something wrong. But that does not mean that the entire institution is at fault. What is the point in demolishing an educational centre?” requested Kadir.

    From April 1 final yr, 610 state-run madrassas in Assam had been transformed into higher main, excessive and better secondary colleges with no change of standing, pay, allowances and repair situations for the educating and non-teaching employees.

    Following it, the State Madrassa Education Board, Assam was dissolved and the final Assam High Madrassa examination by the Board of Secondary Education, Assam (SEBA) for Class 10 college students befell in 2022.

    At current, there are about 1,000 non-public madrassas, that are run based on the rules and syllabus of the All Assam Tanzim Madaris Qawmiya (AATMQ).

    AATMQ provides common programs until class eight and theology thereafter.

    From this yr these wishing to review common programs for courses 9 and 10 in madrassas will be capable to seem for the exams beneath an open education system with its help.

    Meanwhile, a senior official of the SEBA stated that about 10 non-public madrassas have approached it for changing these into common colleges, which was carried out after following the due course of.

    Opposition senior Congress chief Rakibul Hussain hit out on the Himanta Biswa Sarma authorities for the demolitions, “It is unconstitutional to destroy the madrassas.

    The chief minister stated that the suspected jihadis entered Assam or began their actions throughout the final three yr. If so, then solely the BJP needs to be blamed as they’re in energy since 2016.”

    He additionally alleged that Sarma is making contradictory statements as he had praised the madrassas as centres of spiritualism throughout his days within the Congress, however is now blaming them for anti-social actions.

    Opposition All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) stated that the Assam authorities is “totally wrong” in bulldozing the tutorial centres on the pretext of curbing jihadi actions.

    “If there were something wrong, then rectify those. After all these madrassas are imparting education. Demolishing the madrassas is an expression of hatred against one particular community,” AIUDF MLA Ashraful Hussain stated.

    He additionally stated that Assam state Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, headed by AIUDF chief Badruddin Ajmal, and AATMQ are contemplating approaching the courtroom towards the demolition of the madrassas.

    CPI(M) state secretary Suprakash Talukdar stated the social gathering is completely towards the demolition of madrassas as arresting a suspect isn’t the ultimate step of the justice supply system.

    “The government is breaking all laws. Who is responsible for demolishing a centre of education? Who will pay for its costs? These are usually constructed with public donations,” he stated.

    “The government has become more intolerant. We have also seen a lot of cases against the alleged jihadi elements. But what is the fate of those cases? Were those accused convicted?” he requested.

    More than 40 folks with suspected hyperlinks to jihadi components, together with Bangladeshi nationals, have been arrested within the state since March this yr.

  • Prophet comment fallout: Don’t go to TV debates, Muslim private legislation board tells Islamic students

    By Online Desk

    The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Friday appealed to Muslim students and Ulemas (Maulvis) to not take part in TV channel debates.

    “By participating in programs, they are not able to do any service to Islam and Muslims, but indirectly insult and ridicule Islam and Muslims,” the Muslim physique mentioned in an advisory.

    The @AIMPLB_Official has appealed to Islamic Scholars/Ulemas and Muslim Intellectuals to not take part in TV Channel debates. pic.twitter.com/ASgjUuDUG3

    — Muslim Spaces (@MuslimSpaces) June 10, 2022

    AIMPLB mentioned that the Muslim Scholars and Ulemas ought to boycott these channels whose solely goal is to ridicule Islam and Muslims. “If we boycott their programmes, not only their TRPs will fall but they will also miserably fail in their objectives,” AIMPLB mentioned.

    The Muslim physique added that participation within the TV debates doesn’t serve Islam and Muslims. Rather, it not directly insults and ridicules the sect.

    “The purpose of these programme is never to reach a conclusion through constructive debate. They invite a Muslim scholar only to prove their ‘fairness’ and our scholars and ulemas fall prey to their conspiracies,” the board mentioned.

    WATCH |

  • To clarify legal guidelines, AIMPLB to launch webseries and journal

    The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Monday introduced that it could quickly launch a authorized journal in Urdu and English, and a webseries to unfold consciousness about Sharia and Indian legal guidelines, and clarify courtroom judgments to Muslims.
    The resolution was taken throughout a board assembly led by its president Mohd Rabey Hasani Nadvi.
    “The working committee of AIMPLB passed a resolution to start a Sharia awareness webseries. It also decided to start a legal journal in the Urdu and English languages,” learn a tweet from AIMPLB’s deal with.

    The working committee of @AIMPLB_Official handed a decision to begin a Sharia consciousness net collection. It additionally determined to begin issuing a authorized journal in Urdu and English languages. pic.twitter.com/Q80Nmr9Bn2
    — All India Muslim Personal Law Board (@AIMPLB_Official) February 21, 2021
    Speaking to The Indian Express, AIMPLB basic secretary Syed Mohammad Wali Rahmani stated the thought behind the online collection was to unfold consciousness on authorized points for Muslims. “The series will be done in an interview-discussion format… The series will analyse high court and supreme court judgments so that common people can understand them. Not just Sharia, we will also focus on the country’s laws and judgments,” stated Rahmani.
    According to an announcement issued by the Board, board member Asma Zehra has been tasked with getting ready a blueprint for the webseries. Lawyer members like Yusuf Hatim Muchhala, Zafaryab Jilani and M R Shamshad “endorsed this suggestion, and said they will give it their time”.
    Advocate M R Shamshad has been requested to organize a plan for the authorized journal in English and Urdu and “present it to the general secretary”.
    In the assembly, the problem of safeguarding Waqf properties was additionally mentioned and a marketing campaign on this regard might be launched throughout the nation.

    “…The Waqf Act was prepared and approved after a lot of hard work. It has provisions to safeguard Waqf properties from being sold. But efforts are being made from several quarters to make changes to these provisions, which can threaten the safeguarding of Waqf properties. So, it was decided that for the safety of Waqf properties, a campaign should be launched across the country,” learn the assertion issued in Urdu.

    The board stated it was combating instances associated to Waqf properties “in its full capacity”.

  • AIMPLB strikes SC, opposes plea for ‘uniform divorce grounds’

    The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has approached the Supreme Court opposing a plea that seeks “uniform grounds of divorce” for all residents, irrespective of religion, gender or homeland.
    In its software, the legislation board mentioned that non-public legal guidelines don’t fall inside the ambit of “laws in force” in Article 13 of the Constitution.
    The “expression and ‘Custom and Usage’ in Article 13 of the Constitution does not include faith of a religious denomination embedded in personal laws”, and, subsequently, “all matters of faith having a direct relationship to a religious denomination being matters of personal law cannot be tested on the anvil of Articles, 14, 15, 21 and 44 of the Constitution of India”, the plea mentioned.
    The Constituent Assembly, the plea mentioned, was conscious of the excellence between “personal law” and “custom and usage” and selected advisedly to incorporate solely the latter in Article 13.
    The software sought the court docket’s permission to be made a celebration within the petition filed by Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay.