Report Wire

Tag: Divorce

  • Hardik Pandya And Natasa Stankovic Announce Divorce After 4 Years Of Marriage | cricket news

    Hardik Pandya and Natasa Stankovic are officially not together. A social media post from Stankovic has confirmed the news about their divorce. The rumors of trouble in their relationship were roaming around for months on the internet and the couple has finally broken silence via a statement.

    “After four years of being together, Hardik and I have decided to mutually part ways. We tried our best together and gave it our all, and we believe this is in the best interest for both of us. This was a tough decision for us to make, given the joy, mutual respect, and companionship we enjoyed together and as we grew a family. We are blessed with Agastya, who will continue to be at the center of both our lives, and we will co-parent to ensure that. we give him everything that we can for his happiness. We sincerely request your support and understanding to give us privacy during this difficult and sensitive time,” read the statement. (‘Hard Work Does Not Go Unnoticed’: Hardik Pandya On Journey From ODI World Cup 2023 To T20 World Cup 2024 Win)


    Talking about his son, Hardik said that Agastya will be at the center of their lives. The India all-rounder confirmed that he and his wife will co-parent for the well-being of their three-year-old child. Hardik also urged for ‘support’ and ‘privacy’ from people during this “difficult and sensitive time.”

    “We are blessed with Agastya, who will continue to be at the center of both our lives and we will co-parent to ensure that we give him everything that we can for his happiness. We sincerely request your support and understanding to give us the privacy during this difficult and sensitive time,” he added.

    In the recently concluded T20 World Cup, Pandya played a crucial role in India’s victory. He scored 144 runs in six innings at an average of 48.00 and a strike rate of 151.57, with a half-century and best score of 50*. He also took 11 wickets in eight games at an average of 17.36 and an economy rate of 7.64, with the best figures of 3/20.

    Facing injuries and controversies not so long ago, Hardik once again delivered when all the lights shone bright on him, playing a major role in his side’s ICC T20 World Cup triumph.

    It was Hardik who secured the crucial wicket of Heinrich Klaasen in the 177-run chase during the final and also bowled the crucial final over in which he dismissed David Miller, which completely turned the game in favor of India. (India’s Squad For Sri Lanka Tour: Suryakumar Yadav Named Captain For T20Is; KL Rahul Selected For ODIs)

    This tournament marked a redemption tale for Hardik, who was booed out of nearly every stadium across India during the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2024 after taking over the captaincy of the Mumbai Indians (MI) from five-time IPL champion Rohit Sharma.

    The all-rounder, who was just making a comeback into the game after suffering an injury to his ankle in the 50-over World Cup last year, became a victim of online trolling and fan wars as he was accused of “betraying” the MI. franchise, Rohit, and his former franchise, Gujarat Titans (GT), which he led to the IPL title in 2022. (With ANI Inputs)

  • Man Sues Apple After Wife Reads Deleted iMessage Chats With Sex Workers |

    New Delhi: USA Tech giant Apple is being blamed and sued by a British businessman for his costly divorce. Now, a British man is suing an iPhone maker for approximately Rs 53 crore. The whole incident arose after his messages to sex workers which he thought were deleted, showed up on the family iMac and read by the man’s wife, leading to divorce proceedings.

    The middle-aged man, known only as Richard, also claims that the tech giant Apple has failed to inform users that deleting a message on one device does not remove it from all linked devices, as reported by The Times. The man has reportedly called upon London-based law firm Rosenblatt to file a lawsuit against the iPhone maker. However, the roughly Rs 53 crore lawsuit is to seek compensation for the financial losses incurred from the divorce and legal fees.

    Deleted Messages Recovered

    A man, who chose to remain anonymous, had used iMessage to communicate with sex workers. He thought he had deleted the incriminating messages from his iPhone. Unfortunately, he overlooked the synchronization feature of devices linked by the same Apple ID.

    In the end, the messages remained accessible on the family’s iMac, leading his wife to file for divorce.

    Impact on Marriage:

    He described divorce as an “extraordinarily stressful process,” especially when children and family dynamics are involved. He blamed the ordeal on Apple’s incorrect notification that his messages were deleted, which they were not. He noted that a message confirming the deletion on the device would have been a helpful indication.

    He described divorce as an “extraordinarily stressful process,” particularly when children and family dynamics come into play. He attributed the ordeal to Apple’s incorrect notification that his messages were deleted, which they were not. He mentioned that a more rational conversation could have saved his marriage if the messages hadn’t been discovered in such a harsh manner.

  • SC brings curtain down on 27-year-old marital discord, refuses divorce to octogenarian couple

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Bringing down the curtains on a 27-year-old marital discord, the Supreme Court refused to grant divorce to a few within the “late evening of their lives” saying the establishment of marriage occupies an necessary place and performs a key position within the society.

    The prime courtroom stated regardless of the growing pattern of submitting divorce proceedings in courts, the establishment of marriage remains to be thought of to be a pious, non secular and invaluable emotional life-net between {couples} within the Indian society.

    A bench of justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi dismissed the attraction filed by a 89-year-old man in opposition to the choice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court reversing a Chandigarh’s district courtroom order granting divorce to him. His spouse is aged 82.

    “In our opinion, one should not be oblivious to the fact that the institution of marriage occupies an important place and plays an important role in society…It is governed not only by the letters of law but by social norms as well. So many other relationships stem from and thrive on the matrimonial relationships in society. Therefore, it would not be desirable to accept the formula of ‘irretrievable breakdown of marriage’ as a strait-jacket formula for the grant of relief of divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India,” the bench stated.

    The prime courtroom famous the spouse all all through her life has maintained the sacred relationship since 1963 and has taken care of her three youngsters even if her husband exhibited complete hostility in direction of them.

    “The respondent (wife) is still ready and willing to take care of her husband and does not wish to leave him alone at this stage of life. She has also expressed her sentiments that she does not want to die with the stigma of being a ‘divorcee’ woman. In contemporary society, it may not constitute a stigma but here we are concerned with the respondent’s own sentiment,” the bench stated, in its order dated October 10.

    It stated, “Under the circumstances, considering and respecting the sentiments of the respondent wife, the court is of the opinion that exercising the discretion in favour of the appellant (husband) under Article 142 by dissolving the marriage between parties on the ground that the marriage has irretrievably broken down, would not be doing “full justice” to the parties, would rather be doing injustice to the respondent. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to accept the submission of the appellant to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.”

    Justice Trivedi, who penned the decision on behalf of the bench, famous that the husband, who’s a certified physician and retired from the Indian Air Force, had initiated divorce proceedings in March 1996 underneath the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of ‘cruelty’ and ‘desertion’ by his spouse, a retired trainer.

    The man alleged that his estranged spouse had handled him cruelly and abandoned him by not becoming a member of him when he was transferred to Madras, and thereafter not caring for him although he had a coronary heart drawback.

    He had additional claimed the spouse had made complaints to the Air Force authorities in opposition to him to malign his picture and these have been the acts of ‘cruelty’, entitling him to a decree of divorce.

    He submitted within the prime courtroom that they’ve been staying individually for the reason that time he had filed the divorce petition within the district courtroom, and the wedding having been irretrievably damaged down, the apex courtroom ought to train its plenary powers underneath Article 142 of the Constitution and grant a decree of divorce.

    On the opposite hand, the spouse submitted within the prime courtroom that she being an aged girl, didn’t need to die with the stigma of a “divorcee” and he or she had made all efforts to respect the sacred relationship between the events all by way of out and remains to be able to take care of her husband with the help of her son.

    She submitted {that a} mere lengthy interval of separation couldn’t tantamount to irretrievable breakdown of the wedding and her husband had didn’t make out any floor both of ‘cruelty’ or ‘desertion’.

    The spouse urged the highest courtroom to not intervene with the order of the excessive courtroom, which has accepted her plea of not granting divorce.

    The bench stated the truth that each the events are within the “late evening of their lives”, the courtroom had anticipated them to sit down collectively and discover the opportunity of an amicable settlement.

    The effort having failed, the courtroom determined to adjudicate the matter on advantage, the bench stated.

    Dealing with the allegations of ‘cruelty’ and ‘desertion’ levelled by the husband, the bench stated it was taking a view just like the excessive courtroom as he has didn’t show that his spouse had handled him with ‘cruelty’ or had ‘abandoned’ him.

    The couple had married in line with Sikh rites on March 10, 1963 at Amritsar and had three youngsters – two daughters and one son.

    The relations between them have been regular however acrimony appeared to have developed when the husband was posted at Madras in January 1984 and the spouse didn’t be part of him, and most well-liked to remain initially along with her in-laws and son, the bench famous.

    The prime courtroom additional famous that regardless of honest efforts having been made by the events, the variations and disputes couldn’t be resolved, which in the end led the husband to file divorce proceedings on March 12, 1996, earlier than the district courtroom.

    Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp

    NEW DELHI: Bringing down the curtains on a 27-year-old marital discord, the Supreme Court refused to grant divorce to a few within the “late evening of their lives” saying the establishment of marriage occupies an necessary place and performs a key position within the society.

    The prime courtroom stated regardless of the growing pattern of submitting divorce proceedings in courts, the establishment of marriage remains to be thought of to be a pious, non secular and invaluable emotional life-net between {couples} within the Indian society.

    A bench of justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M Trivedi dismissed the attraction filed by a 89-year-old man in opposition to the choice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court reversing a Chandigarh’s district courtroom order granting divorce to him. His spouse is aged 82.googletag.cmd.push(perform() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    “In our opinion, one should not be oblivious to the fact that the institution of marriage occupies an important place and plays an important role in society…It is governed not only by the letters of law but by social norms as well. So many other relationships stem from and thrive on the matrimonial relationships in society. Therefore, it would not be desirable to accept the formula of ‘irretrievable breakdown of marriage’ as a strait-jacket formula for the grant of relief of divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India,” the bench stated.

    The prime courtroom famous the spouse all all through her life has maintained the sacred relationship since 1963 and has taken care of her three youngsters even if her husband exhibited complete hostility in direction of them.

    “The respondent (wife) is still ready and willing to take care of her husband and does not wish to leave him alone at this stage of life. She has also expressed her sentiments that she does not want to die with the stigma of being a ‘divorcee’ woman. In contemporary society, it may not constitute a stigma but here we are concerned with the respondent’s own sentiment,” the bench stated, in its order dated October 10.

    It stated, “Under the circumstances, considering and respecting the sentiments of the respondent wife, the court is of the opinion that exercising the discretion in favour of the appellant (husband) under Article 142 by dissolving the marriage between parties on the ground that the marriage has irretrievably broken down, would not be doing “full justice” to the parties, would rather be doing injustice to the respondent. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to accept the submission of the appellant to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage.”

    Justice Trivedi, who penned the decision on behalf of the bench, famous that the husband, who’s a certified physician and retired from the Indian Air Force, had initiated divorce proceedings in March 1996 underneath the Hindu Marriage Act on grounds of ‘cruelty’ and ‘desertion’ by his spouse, a retired trainer.

    The man alleged that his estranged spouse had handled him cruelly and abandoned him by not becoming a member of him when he was transferred to Madras, and thereafter not caring for him although he had a coronary heart drawback.

    He had additional claimed the spouse had made complaints to the Air Force authorities in opposition to him to malign his picture and these have been the acts of ‘cruelty’, entitling him to a decree of divorce.

    He submitted within the prime courtroom that they’ve been staying individually for the reason that time he had filed the divorce petition within the district courtroom, and the wedding having been irretrievably damaged down, the apex courtroom ought to train its plenary powers underneath Article 142 of the Constitution and grant a decree of divorce.

    On the opposite hand, the spouse submitted within the prime courtroom that she being an aged girl, didn’t need to die with the stigma of a “divorcee” and he or she had made all efforts to respect the sacred relationship between the events all by way of out and remains to be able to take care of her husband with the help of her son.

    She submitted {that a} mere lengthy interval of separation couldn’t tantamount to irretrievable breakdown of the wedding and her husband had didn’t make out any floor both of ‘cruelty’ or ‘desertion’.

    The spouse urged the highest courtroom to not intervene with the order of the excessive courtroom, which has accepted her plea of not granting divorce.

    The bench stated the truth that each the events are within the “late evening of their lives”, the courtroom had anticipated them to sit down collectively and discover the opportunity of an amicable settlement.

    The effort having failed, the courtroom determined to adjudicate the matter on advantage, the bench stated.

    Dealing with the allegations of ‘cruelty’ and ‘desertion’ levelled by the husband, the bench stated it was taking a view just like the excessive courtroom as he has didn’t show that his spouse had handled him with ‘cruelty’ or had ‘abandoned’ him.

    The couple had married in line with Sikh rites on March 10, 1963 at Amritsar and had three youngsters – two daughters and one son.

    The relations between them have been regular however acrimony appeared to have developed when the husband was posted at Madras in January 1984 and the spouse didn’t be part of him, and most well-liked to remain initially along with her in-laws and son, the bench famous.

    The prime courtroom additional famous that regardless of honest efforts having been made by the events, the variations and disputes couldn’t be resolved, which in the end led the husband to file divorce proceedings on March 12, 1996, earlier than the district courtroom. Follow The New Indian Express channel on WhatsApp

  • Sorry, prenuptial agreements are usually not acknowledged in India

    Is there a method to safeguard your property by a prenuptial settlement earlier than your wedding ceremony? A prenup pact will help you solely to a restricted extent. This is as a result of there isn’t any formal laws on prenuptial agreements in India.

    A prenup settlement is a contract signed by a pair earlier than they get married and determines the possession rights of their respective property if the wedding fails later. In case of a divorce, the division of property and alimony payout to the partner occurs as per situations laid down within the prenup settlement. Prenups are prevalent in international locations just like the US and Australia and slowly gaining floor amongst Indian {couples}. However, it isn’t authorized in India.

    “Pre-nuptial agreements have historically been perceived as being towards public coverage. While Indian tradition continues to put emphasis on the standard nature of marriage, it’s plain that the angle in the direction of marriage has been evolving. Today, spouses are extra comfy demarcating and defending property acquired by them previous to marriage,” mentioned Jahnavi Dwarkadas, affiliate accomplice, SNG & Partners.

    As there are not any formal legal guidelines on prenups, the phrases and situations laid down within the contract are usually not legally binding and the validity of these situations, in case of a dispute raised by both of the partner, are lastly determined within the courts. In any case, the prenup situations can’t override the authorized rights of a partner, say authorized consultants.

    “In the absence of any formal laws governing pre-nuptial agreements, the legislation on the topic is basically judge-made,” Dwarkadas said. “All pre-nuptial agreements are tested against the touchstone of public policy as any contract against public policy is considered invalid. Any agreement that ignores statutory rights and obligations would be deemed invalid. For example, agreements that pre-determine aspects of custody of children, or deprive a spouse of the statutory right to maintenance and alimony, have been struck-off by courts as being against public policy and are therefore invalid.”

    Adarsh Priyadarshi, advocate, Supreme Court of India, quotes one other instance and says: “As per Hindu marriage legal guidelines, a spouse has a authorized proper to reside in her matrimonial home. So, any situation within the prenup settlement that claims the spouse can’t reside within the matrimonial home if the wedding fails is superseding the legislation and shall be null and void. A prenup can’t supersede an individual’s statutory rights.”

    Priyadarshi, who focuses on prison legislation together with these arising out of matrimonial disputes, added that Hindu marriage legal guidelines contemplate marriage a sacrament and don’t deal with it as a contract, and therefore, a prenup might not be helpful in figuring out division of property or the alimony quantity upfront.

    “So far, our studying from our expertise in such issues has been that the pre-nuptial settlement ought to be seen to be one which promotes marriage versus facilitating a breakdown,” mentioned Dwarkadas.

    Muslim legal guidelines comply with mehr or dower that imposes an obligation on the husband to provide cash or property to his spouse. A prenup will be helpful in figuring out the mehr quantity.

    That mentioned, Dwarkadas mentioned, over time, the judiciary has been taking a look at such agreements extra liberally, recognizing the private rights and preferences of companions and inspiring the evolution of matrimonial legal guidelines.

    People eager on a prenup settlement ought to lay down the situations fastidiously after consulting their legal professionals. The sole intent shouldn’t be to withhold property from the partner as that will end in a contract denying both of the partner their rights.

    “It is essential that the settlement doesn’t deprive both get together of any statutory proper out there below legislation or pre-decide issues resembling custody of kids,” mentioned Dwarkadas.

    “The proposed settlement ought to document that it’s being entered into to reduce battle in monetary issues. Further, the settlement ought to clearly establish and document particular person and joint property of each the events in addition to the rights that one partner might have on the opposite’s property within the occasion of a breakdown.”

  • Britney Spears To Divorce Husband Sam Asghari? Deets Inside

    According to stories, Britney Spears and Sam Asghari received into an enormous struggle, following which the latter moved out and began residing in his personal place.

    Britney Spears headed for a divorce.

    All will not be nicely between Britney Spears and her husband, Sam Asghari. If stories are to be believed, the couple has separated after allegations of the singer dishonest surfaced. According to sources near the duo, Sam Asghari not too long ago confronted Britney Spears over rumours that she cheated on him. While it’s not identified but if these rumours have any foundation or not, the model-actor appears to consider it. Britney Spears and Sam Asghari reportedly received into an enormous struggle, after which the latter moved out to dwell in a spot of his personal.

    TMZ reported earlier that the couple has been dealing with hassle for months, and Sam Asghari was not even sleeping at their home more often than not. Going by the sources, the singer received bodily together with her husband throughout their fights. Britney Spears reportedly has a prenup which protects her property. However, it’s believed that this marriage will come to an finish with Britney Spears writing a test for Sam Asghari to settle issues.

    Britney Spears behaviour is thought to be erratic at instances, and it was assumed that her husband was over it. Sam Asghari has even publicly defended the singer from critics, however privately, he’s reported to have been annoyed.

    How Britney Spears And Sam Asghari met

    Britney Spears and Sam Asghari began relationship again in 2016, after he received a gig in one of many singer’s music movies. Ever since then, these two have been virtually inseparable. Meanwhile, through the #FreeBritney motion, he was seen supporting Brit’s followers.

    Britney Spears was unable to comprise her pleasure when Sam Asghari popped the massive query again in September 2021. The singer used social media to share footage and movies of her ring with the followers.

    These two lastly tied the knot in a small personal ceremony at their Thousand Oaks home. Although the ceremony was not free from drama because of certainly one of her exes, the marriage went with no hitch.

    While the divorce papers haven’t been filed until now, based on the sources it ought to occur quickly sufficient. Neither Britney Spears nor Sam Asghari has commented on the stories until now.

    Don’t Miss Out on the Latest Updates.
    Subscribe to Our Newsletter Today!

    Subscribe Now

  • Income tax information: How one-time alimony is taxed?

    A decrease court docket has divorced me however my spouse has put an enchantment in High Court. So my divorce decree has been placed on maintain till the High Court decides the case. Now me and my spouse don’t want the proceedings of court docket to go on and subsequently wish to go for mutual consent for divorce within the High Court. I haven’t got the quantity to present to her as one-time alimony so I’ve determined to present away a property standing in my mom’s identify to my spouse. I wish to know if my mom can provide the property which is in her identify to my spouse on the time of the divorce settlement within the excessive court docket. I additionally wish to know whether or not my spouse may have any tax implications now and when she sells that property.

    Under regular circumstances when a mother-in-law makes a present to the daughter-in-law, the earnings arising from such an asset is required within the fingers of the parent-in-law who had made such a present. I perceive the home property which stands in your mom’s identify might be transferred by your mom to your spouse in consideration of your spouse agreeing to the phrases of mutual divorce. So there isn’t a query of there being no consideration for this switch. It just isn’t vital that the consideration must be between the identical events. It may even transfer from a 3rd occasion.

    The clubbing provisions apply so long as the connection between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law subsists. Since in your case, the connection of mother-in-law and daughter-in-law will get severed on the time of the ultimate pronouncement of divorce, the query of clubbing doesn’t come up anyway.

    Since the flat is being transferred for consideration, there isn’t a tax legal responsibility in your spouse in respect of receipt of such a flat. However, as and when your spouse sells it, she should pay capital good points tax on the capital good points computed as per the provisions of earnings tax legal guidelines.

    Please word that the total worth won’t grow to be taxable as your spouse will be capable to take the price of the property to your mom as her price and compute the capital good points accordingly.

    Balwant Jain is a tax and investments professional and may be reached at [email protected] and @jainbalwant as his Twitter deal with.

     

    Catch all of the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint.
    Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

    More
    Less

    Updated: 14 Jul 2023, 12:02 PM IST

  • Navigating monetary features post-divorce: How to interact with a wealth advisor

    The broadly used Holmes-Rahe Stress Scale, developed to measure the causation between stress and sickness, ranks divorce because the second most disturbing life occasion. The case is additional difficult in a conservative nation like India. Though we nonetheless have one of many lowest divorce charges on the earth at 1%, the variety of divorcees has doubled over the previous 20 years. Divorce is extra prevalent among the many prosperous, and is an costly affair, laden with difficult monetary selections that severely impression the post-divorce lifetime of each people.

    The state of affairs is usually extra overwhelming for Indian girls, 50% of whom will not be lively buyers, in response to a survey by LXME. Furthermore, a UBS world examine signifies that even for high-net-worth girls, the boys of their households handle their monetary planning. In this emotionally riveting interval, taking smart and strategic monetary selections turns into troublesome. Strategically planning alimony, navigating division of joint-owned properties, estimating streedhan, and funding aims post-divorce are essential selections that should be backed by technique.

    While step one of a divorce is discovering a robust lawyer, few recognise the significance of a wealth advisor, who’re custodians of wealth for enterprise households and the prosperous. They guarantee emotionally-driven, unplanned monetary selections will not be made earlier than, throughout, or after divorce.

    Bringing in a wealth advisor is essential at two levels: (i) During the divorce, they help in deciding settlement sums and supporting attorneys. (ii) Post-settlement, they navigate inherited wealth by guiding investments, advising on property and succession planning, and managing philanthropic aims.

    Once a wealth advisor has been onboarded, listed below are 5 inquiries to provoke the engagement in the precise course:

    1. Can you assist me perceive the monetary impression of my divorce, and the way do I work via the monetary problems with separation? Divorce has a big impression on earnings, property, money owed, and bills. The wealth advisor can present insights based mostly on the relevant private and non secular legal guidelines, and assist people accordingly make knowledgeable selections relating to property division, alimony, baby assist, and different monetary issues.

    2. What are the tax implications of dividing property in the course of the divorce, and might you present me with steerage on find out how to reduce my tax liabilities? Each asset distribution has a novel tax implication. By analysing the tax foundation, capital features, and potential deductions, the advisor can present steerage on structuring asset division to reduce tax liabilities.

    3. How can we handle possession of joint custody accounts throughout and after the divorce, and what must be accomplished to make sure each events have equal entry to the accounts? Managing shared monetary obligations of joint custody accounts is a big concern. A wealth advisor guides on organising acceptable permissions, establishing communication channels, and implementing methods to trace contributions and bills.

    4. How will we demarcate our property if we have now co-ownership of an enterprise, what’s one of the simplest ways to find out the truthful worth of the enterprise, and the way can we guarantee every occasion will get their justifiable share of the property? While demarcating property in case of co-owned enterprise, courts usually depend on elements corresponding to monetary statements, market evaluation, and trade benchmarks to find out the truthful worth. The wealth advisor may help interact professionals specializing in enterprise valuation, guaranteeing an correct evaluation.

    5. Can you assist create an funding technique to fulfill monetary targets post-divorce, and the way can I guarantee my funding is aligned with my monetary state of affairs and targets? After divorce, reassessing monetary targets and funding technique is essential. A wealth advisor considers elements corresponding to threat tolerance, time horizon, earnings necessities, and long-term aims, to advocate choices, and create a diversified portfolio aligned with the present monetary state of affairs and targets.

    Divorce isn’t nice, and it should be admitted that no quantity of planning may assist handle the emotional burden of the method. But sound monetary planning is essential in the course of the means of divorce, and the position of a dependable wealth advisor is essential.

    Nita Shivdasani is an government director and head of heritage at Waterfield Advisors

    Catch all of the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint.
    Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

    More
    Less

    Updated: 07 Jun 2023, 10:43 PM IST

    Topics

  • SC says it could dissolve marriage on grounds of ‘irretrievable breakdown’

    By Online Desk

    NEW DELHI: India’s prime court docket docket on Monday held that it could dissolve a marriage on the underside of “irretrievable breakdown.”

    A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S Okay Kaul talked about the apex court docket docket is empowered beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to do full justice.

    Article 142 of the Constitution provides with the enforcement of decrees and orders of the apex court docket docket to do “complete justice” in any matter pending sooner than it.

    “We have held that it is possible for this court to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage,” the bench, moreover comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, A S Oka, Vikram Nath and J Okay Maheshwari, talked about.

    The SC bench extra held that the six-month compulsory prepared interval for situations of divorce by mutual consent could also be discarded counting on circumstances enacted in earlier judgements.

    The apex court docket docket delivered the choice on a batch of petitions relating to the prepare of its big powers beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve broken-down marriages between consenting {{couples}} with out referring them to family courts for protracted judicial proceedings to get the decree of separation.

    (With inputs from PTI)

    NEW DELHI: India’s prime court docket docket on Monday held that it could dissolve a marriage on the underside of “irretrievable breakdown.”

    A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S Okay Kaul talked about the apex court docket docket is empowered beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to do full justice.

    Article 142 of the Constitution provides with the enforcement of decrees and orders of the apex court docket docket to do “complete justice” in any matter pending sooner than it.googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    “We have held that it is possible for this court to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage,” the bench, moreover comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, A S Oka, Vikram Nath and J Okay Maheshwari, talked about.

    The SC bench extra held that the six-month compulsory prepared interval for situations of divorce by mutual consent could also be discarded counting on circumstances enacted in earlier judgements.

    The apex court docket docket delivered the choice on a batch of petitions relating to the prepare of its big powers beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve broken-down marriages between consenting {{couples}} with out referring them to family courts for protracted judicial proceedings to get the decree of separation.

    (With inputs from PTI)

  • SC says it could dissolve marriage on grounds of ‘irretrievable breakdown’

    By Online Desk

    NEW DELHI: India’s prime court docket docket on Monday held that it could dissolve a marriage on the underside of “irretrievable breakdown.”

    A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S Okay Kaul talked about the apex court docket docket is empowered beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to do full justice.

    Article 142 of the Constitution presents with the enforcement of decrees and orders of the apex court docket docket to do “complete justice” in any matter pending sooner than it.

    “We have held that it is possible for this court to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage,” the bench, moreover comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, A S Oka, Vikram Nath and J Okay Maheshwari, talked about.

    The SC bench extra held that the six-month compulsory prepared interval for cases of divorce by mutual consent could also be discarded counting on circumstances enacted in earlier judgements.

    The apex court docket docket delivered the choice on a batch of petitions relating to the prepare of its enormous powers beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve broken-down marriages between consenting {{couples}} with out referring them to family courts for protracted judicial proceedings to get the decree of separation.

    (With inputs from PTI)

    NEW DELHI: India’s prime court docket docket on Monday held that it could dissolve a marriage on the underside of “irretrievable breakdown.”

    A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S Okay Kaul talked about the apex court docket docket is empowered beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to do full justice.

    Article 142 of the Constitution presents with the enforcement of decrees and orders of the apex court docket docket to do “complete justice” in any matter pending sooner than it.googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    “We have held that it is possible for this court to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage,” the bench, moreover comprising justices Sanjiv Khanna, A S Oka, Vikram Nath and J Okay Maheshwari, talked about.

    The SC bench extra held that the six-month compulsory prepared interval for cases of divorce by mutual consent could also be discarded counting on circumstances enacted in earlier judgements.

    The apex court docket docket delivered the choice on a batch of petitions relating to the prepare of its enormous powers beneath Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve broken-down marriages between consenting {{couples}} with out referring them to family courts for protracted judicial proceedings to get the decree of separation.

    (With inputs from PTI)

  • Money Can Break a Marriage, Even Getting More of It

    Many {couples} are discovering {that a} monetary windfall can rock their relationship simply as a lot as any hardship.