Tag: domestic violence

  • Nawazuddin Siddiqui Served Notice by Mumbai Court After Wife Aaliya Files Domestic Violence Case

    Home LeisureNawazuddin Siddiqui Served Notice by Mumbai Court After Wife Aaliya Files Domestic Violence Allegations

    Nawazuddin Siddiqui has been served discover by a Mumbai courtroom after his spouse Aaliya Siddiqui filed a case of home violence towards him and his household.

    Nawazuddin Siddiqui Served Notice by Mumbai Court After Wife Aaliya Files Domestic Violence Allegations

    Nawazuddin Siddiqui Served Notice by Mumbai Court: Nawazuddin Siddiqui has been served discover by courtroom after his spouse Aaliya Siddiqui accused him and his household of home violence. The Mumbai courtroom acted upon Aaliya’s grievance over a contemporary dispute. Earlier, she had additionally alleged about feeling trapped inside her personal home. In her assertion, Aaliya mentioned, “My access to the kitchen is banned and I have made the living room sofa, my bed. My friends who send food are not allowed to come in and I am scared to step out, even till the gate to fetch the food. What if doors are closed behind my back?” She additional added, “I have known Nawaz for over a decade, I married him when he was not such a popular star. So as his wife, why am I not allowed to live in my own house? Even delivery agents are not allowed in the house, I feel trapped.” She concluded by mentioning, “I don’t have any alternate accommodation. Besides, why should I leave what is rightfully mine?”

    MUMBAI’S ANDHERI COURT ISSUES NOTICE TO NAWAZUDDIN SIDDIQUI

    Nawazuddin’s mom Mehrunisa Siddiqui had filed an FIR (First Information Report) towards his spouse for alleged trespassing, as reported by ETimes. Aaliya recorded her assertion on the Versova Police Station. After Mehrunisa alleged that she wasn’t Nawazuddin’s spouse, Aaliya filed a countercase beneath part 509, an insult to modesty and part 498A, husband or relative of husband of a lady subjecting her to cruelty. She claimed that she was denied entry to meals, fundamental facilities and toilet. Mumbai’s Andheri courtroom has issued a discover to the actor over the grievance filed by his spouse, as reported by Times Now.

    AALIYA SIDDIQUI’S LAWYER ALLEGES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST NAWAZUDDIN SIDDIQUI’S FAMILY

    Her lawyer, in an interplay with ETimes mentioned, “I’m going by the admission on paper by Nawaz that Aaliya is his lawfully wedded wife because that is what he says everywhere. And if this case is true, then there is no case of trespass, which can be made against Aaliya by her mother-in-law because she has got no right or liberty to fight any kind of trespassing case against a wife who is entering her own husband’s house. After CCTV cameras were installed, now even bodyguards are there, stopping Aaliya from going to the bathroom in the upper rooms. This means, their complaint of trespass is baseless, and Nawaz is cornered from both sides. Either there is a rape case against him or there is a case of domestic violence because she is not getting food, there is mental, physical, emotional and financial abuse.”

    Aaliya’s lawyer concluded, as he identified, “The manager received my notice and even the husband has received my notice but they have never bothered to respond. They kept quiet and even threatened.”

    Aaliya is Nawazuddin’s second spouse as per the report and the couple tied the knot over a decade in the past. They are dad and mom to son Yaani Siddiqui and daughter Shora Siddiqui.

    For extra updates on Nawazuddin Siddiqui’s spouse Aaliya Siddiqui, try this house at India.com.

    Published Date: February 3, 2023 12:24 PM IST

  • Angelina Jolie Speech From February 2022 On Domestic Violence And Abusive Relations Goes Viral | WATCH

    Home ViralAngelina Jolie Speech From February 2022 On Domestic Violence And Abusive Relations Goes Viral | WATCH

    Her assertion from the speech, “Ugly truth is violence in homes is normalized in our country,” sounds true for nearly any nation.

    Angelina Jolie Speech From February 2022 On Domestic Violence And Abusive Relations Goes Viral | WATCH (Image: Twitter/@liliandaisies)

    Angelina Jolie Speech: Hollywood famous person Angelina Jolie is among the most distinguished figures within the trade. The actress, filmmaker, and humanitarian is a distinguished recipient of an Academy Award and three Golden Globe Awards and has been named Hollywood’s highest-paid actress a number of instances. Apart from the leisure trade, Jolie is well-known for her humanitarian efforts and promotes numerous causes, together with conservation, training, and girls’s rights. However, her private life has not been a fairy story due to her relationships, marriages, and well being points. She is divorced from actors Jonny Lee Miller, Billy Bob Thornton, and Brad Pitt.

    On February 9, 2022, Angelina Jolie delivered a plaintive, touching speech on the problem of home violence the place she urged the US Senate to vote within the favour of renewing the Violence Against Women Act.

    Now, as on January 18, 2023, the speech goes viral and is everywhere in the web house. It is shared on Twitter by @liliandaisies with the caption: “this speech by angelina jolie about domestic violence and child abuse is so powerful. and she and her children are among the millions of victims and survivors who had to suffer abuse in silence.”

    WATCH THE SPEECH VIDEO CLIP HERE

    this speech by angelina jolie about home violence and baby abuse is so highly effective. and she or he and her kids are among the many hundreds of thousands of victims and survivors who needed to undergo abuse in silence. pic.twitter.com/Cm9ImtzwnW

    — lilian (@liliandaisies) January 14, 2023

    As Angelina mentioned, “The reason that many people struggle to leave abusive situations is that they’ve been made to feel worthless,” type of sums up the trials and tribulations of virtually each sufferer of home violence and abusive relationships.

    Her assertion from the speech, “Ugly truth is violence in homes is normalized in our country,” sounds true for nearly any nation.

    What do the pundits say?

    Published Date: January 18, 2023 11:06 PM IST

  • Delhi HC seeks Centre stand on 70-yr-old’s plea in opposition to home violence legislation

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has sought the stand of the Centre on a 70-year-old lady’s problem to a provision underneath the legislation in opposition to home violence which protects even aggressor ladies from being faraway from a shared family.

    The senior citizen mentioned that despite constantly being subjected to home violence allegedly by her daughter-in-law, a trial court docket refused to cross an order of eviction in gentle of the latter’s “right to residence” by way of the proviso to part 19(1) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

    A bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad issued discover on the petition final week and in addition sought the stand of the National Commission of Women and the daughter-in-law.

    The court docket additionally appointed senior advocate Rebecca John as amicus curiae to help it within the matter.

    The petitioner, represented by lawyer Preeti Singh, contended that whereas the Act goals to guard ladies from home violence, the proviso to part 19(1) “acts as an obstacle” for a sufferer lady who’s struggling by the hands of one other lady and it’s, due to this fact, unconstitutional and discriminatory.

    In her plea, the petitioner has additionally sought a path from the court docket to take away her daughter-in-law from the family.

    She alleged that she and her 76-year-old husband have been threatened, harassed, financially exploited and terrorised by the daughter-in-law however the Metropolitan Magistrate “dismissed the petitioner’s application for the said interim relief of directing the respondent No.3 (daughter-in-law) to vacate the shared household observing that her right of residence needs to be protected in view of the proviso to Section 19(1) of the PWDV Act, 2005.”

    “The proviso creates an unreasonable classification on the basis of the sex of the perpetrator and thereby denies relief to an equally aggrieved woman without any intelligible differentia thereby violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India,” the petition mentioned.

    The plea additional said that such a provision additionally “fails to consider the domestic relationship and plight of an aggrieved homosexual woman” dwelling in an abusive relationship.

    “In light of the proviso to Section 19(1) of the PWDV Act, 2005, no woman, irrespective of the extent of domestic violence and atrocities she commits upon the aggrieved person, is liable to be removed from the shared household,” the plea mentioned.

    “Any heterosexual woman can move against her partner to dispossess him from the shared household, such right is not granted to a homosexual woman in light of the proviso to Section 19(1) of the PWDV Act, 2005… The State should strive to enable the women from every segment of society and irrespective of her own sexual orientation or the sex of the perpetrator to grow and move ahead and protect themselves from the atrocities and incidents of domestic violence,” the plea added.

    The matter could be heard subsequent on April 18.

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has sought the stand of the Centre on a 70-year-old lady’s problem to a provision underneath the legislation in opposition to home violence which protects even aggressor ladies from being faraway from a shared family.

    The senior citizen mentioned that despite constantly being subjected to home violence allegedly by her daughter-in-law, a trial court docket refused to cross an order of eviction in gentle of the latter’s “right to residence” by way of the proviso to part 19(1) Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

    A bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad issued discover on the petition final week and in addition sought the stand of the National Commission of Women and the daughter-in-law.

    The court docket additionally appointed senior advocate Rebecca John as amicus curiae to help it within the matter.

    The petitioner, represented by lawyer Preeti Singh, contended that whereas the Act goals to guard ladies from home violence, the proviso to part 19(1) “acts as an obstacle” for a sufferer lady who’s struggling by the hands of one other lady and it’s, due to this fact, unconstitutional and discriminatory.

    In her plea, the petitioner has additionally sought a path from the court docket to take away her daughter-in-law from the family.

    She alleged that she and her 76-year-old husband have been threatened, harassed, financially exploited and terrorised by the daughter-in-law however the Metropolitan Magistrate “dismissed the petitioner’s application for the said interim relief of directing the respondent No.3 (daughter-in-law) to vacate the shared household observing that her right of residence needs to be protected in view of the proviso to Section 19(1) of the PWDV Act, 2005.”

    “The proviso creates an unreasonable classification on the basis of the sex of the perpetrator and thereby denies relief to an equally aggrieved woman without any intelligible differentia thereby violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India,” the petition mentioned.

    The plea additional said that such a provision additionally “fails to consider the domestic relationship and plight of an aggrieved homosexual woman” dwelling in an abusive relationship.

    “In light of the proviso to Section 19(1) of the PWDV Act, 2005, no woman, irrespective of the extent of domestic violence and atrocities she commits upon the aggrieved person, is liable to be removed from the shared household,” the plea mentioned.

    “Any heterosexual woman can move against her partner to dispossess him from the shared household, such right is not granted to a homosexual woman in light of the proviso to Section 19(1) of the PWDV Act, 2005… The State should strive to enable the women from every segment of society and irrespective of her own sexual orientation or the sex of the perpetrator to grow and move ahead and protect themselves from the atrocities and incidents of domestic violence,” the plea added.

    The matter could be heard subsequent on April 18.

  • Pakistani Actor Feroze Khan’s Ex-Wife Syeda Aliza Shares Photos of Bruised Body Parts After Alleging Physical Abuse

    Domestic Violence Case: Pakistani actor Feroze Khan and his ex-wife Syeda Aliza Sultan are preventing a authorized battle for the custody of their two youngsters Mohammed Sultan Khan and Fatima Khan. The duo was granted divorce in September this 12 months after which Sultan now submitted proof of struggling home violence in courtroom. The images that she submitted earlier than the courtroom to strengthen her case have now gone viral on social media and have created a buzz in the whole movie business. So a lot in order that many celebrities from the Pakistani business have additionally demanded a ban on Feroze Khan.Also Read – Indore Woman Inflicts Burns On 9-Year-Old Daughter’s Private Parts As Punishment For Bedwetting

    PAKISTANI ACTOR’S WIFE ALLEGES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, SHARES PHOTOS OF BRUISED ARMS

    The images shared by Syeda Aliza present her bruised arms and eyes and stand as proof of all of the bodily abuse she endured in her four-year-long marriage with Feroze. Earlier, whereas saying her divorce on social media, Aliza had written an extended be aware on Instagram mentioning that she doesn’t need her youngsters to witness this toxicity in a relationship or be taught to take care of abuse of any variety whereas rising up. “Our marriage of four years was utter chaos. In addition to continuous physical and psychological violence during this period, I had to endure infidelity, blackmail, and degradation at my husband’s hands (sic),” learn part of her publish on social media. Also Read – Tribal Woman Beaten Up, Paraded And Forced To Carry Her Husband in MP’s Dewas | Watch

    Also Read – Shweta Tiwari to Nisha Rawal: 10 TV Actresses Who Accused Their Husbands of Domestic Violence

    Aliza’s lawyer Qaim Shah submitted the proof within the type of footage and emergency room reviews to Karachi’s District household courtroom. The paperwork additionally had a report from the Accident and Emergency Department at Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre. It documented the grievance of assault on Aliza on November 2020 by her ex-husband. The point out of “blunt injuries on both arms, back, chest, and face” together with a ‘nosebleed’ was highlighted within the reviews.

    The subsequent listening to of the case is on November 1.

  • Swara Bhasker compares herself to home violence survivor, says remedy helps her take care of trolling

    Actor Swara Bhasker, who was just lately seen within the movie Jahaan Chaar Yaar, has developed her personal method of coping with on-line abuse. The actor is understood to talk her thoughts on the subject of not simply issues associated to the movie business but in addition wider socio-political points. The actor stated that she has discovered to deal with trolling, and made an analogy about survivors of home abuse.

    She advised Connect FM Canada, “I am often a wreck inside but you learn to cope with it, which is not a good thing. I will give you a very bad example and no one should be okay with it, but if there is a woman who is facing domestic violence and it continues and she cannot change her situation for whatever reason, she will build coping strategies. She will know that ‘now I will get hit’ and it’s a very complicated space where a victim learns to cope with the violence and deal with it . So, I feel a similar thing has happened with me. Mentally with the trolling thing and abuses.”

    The actor added, “Sometimes I can see a tweet and have an intuition that something is about to happen and I know that this has started and it has a 24 hour cycle. So, even I have understood the wave of the ‘Twitter controversy’.”

    The actor, who hails from New Delhi, stated that she is aware of who’s targetting her and why. She continued, “The trolling that I receive is very agenda driven. It is people of a particular political ideology who troll me and why they do it, I know that as well.”

    She stated that remedy helps. “Now that I have entered this ideological fight on my own with a lot of energy, how can I leave it now? I chose a side. So, now it’s part and parcel of that act . I don’t read comments and as a result I miss many messages. I hardly open my DMs. That’s one thing, and of course, there is therapy. I have really benefitted from being in therapy and just having a regular conversation with my therapist about about all issues, that sometimes includes this as well.”

  • Harassed by father out on parole, two sisters in UP eat poison; one lifeless

    By PTI

    BANDA: Fed up of being harassed by their father, who was out on parole, two sisters allegedly consumed poison right here, ensuing within the dying of 1, police mentioned on Tuesday.

    The incident befell in Parhri village below the Baberu police station space.

    Additional Superintendent of Police Laxmi Niwas Mishra mentioned on late Sunday night time, two sisters had consumed poison.

    Both the sisters had been rushed to the Banda Medical College for remedy, the place Priyanka (21) died on Monday.

    The youthful sister Sapna (19) is present process remedy, he added.

    ALSO READ | 16-year-old Dalit lady who was gang-raped, set ablaze in UP’s Pilibhit dies 12 days later

    The mom of the women Rekha Devi lodged a grievance towards her husband Malkhan Singh, brother-in-law Suresh and Rajesh, following which a case of abetting suicide was registered towards them, Mishra mentioned, including that the daddy has been arrested.

    Citing the grievance lodged, the Additional SP mentioned the three usually used to beat her and her daughters, threatened the with a countrymade pistol and didn’t enable them to prepare dinner meals in the home.

    The accused had been sentenced to life imprisonment in a double homicide case, which had taken place 16 years in the past and had come dwelling on parole six months in the past, he added.

    BANDA: Fed up of being harassed by their father, who was out on parole, two sisters allegedly consumed poison right here, ensuing within the dying of 1, police mentioned on Tuesday.

    The incident befell in Parhri village below the Baberu police station space.

    Additional Superintendent of Police Laxmi Niwas Mishra mentioned on late Sunday night time, two sisters had consumed poison.

    Both the sisters had been rushed to the Banda Medical College for remedy, the place Priyanka (21) died on Monday.

    The youthful sister Sapna (19) is present process remedy, he added.

    ALSO READ | 16-year-old Dalit lady who was gang-raped, set ablaze in UP’s Pilibhit dies 12 days later

    The mom of the women Rekha Devi lodged a grievance towards her husband Malkhan Singh, brother-in-law Suresh and Rajesh, following which a case of abetting suicide was registered towards them, Mishra mentioned, including that the daddy has been arrested.

    Citing the grievance lodged, the Additional SP mentioned the three usually used to beat her and her daughters, threatened the with a countrymade pistol and didn’t enable them to prepare dinner meals in the home.

    The accused had been sentenced to life imprisonment in a double homicide case, which had taken place 16 years in the past and had come dwelling on parole six months in the past, he added.

  • In contact with household, will guarantee all assist: MEA on Indian girl who died of suicide in US

    Ministry of External Affairs assured that the Indian embassy is in contact with US authorities and Mandeep Kaur’s household.

    Mandeep Kaur posted a video on August 3 which took the web by storm as she talked about years of home abuse inflicted by her husband.

    HIGHLIGHTSMEA assured that the Indian Embassy is in contact with Mandeep Kaur’s householdMandeep Kaur died by suicide on August 3She had grievance of home abuse

    Expressing grief over the suicide of Indian girl Mandeep Kaur within the United States, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Friday assured steps of redressal. The MEA additional acknowledged that the Indian embassy and consulate are in contact with the household of the deceased and native authorities within the US.

    Social media platforms and the world stood zapped after Kaur’s suicide hit the bulletin as she had launched a video previous to the suicide. Thousands condoled her loss of life and social media was taken by storm after Mandeep Kaur’s video went viral. In the video, she alleged that her husband Ranjotveer Singh Sandhu had been torturing her. Narrating her ordeal in a video that she uploaded on social media, Kaur could possibly be seen sobbing whereas her youngsters cried within the background.

    “The suicide of Mandeep Kaur, an Indian living in New York, was very tragic. Our Consulate in New York is in touch with the local authorities, police, family and the Indian community. Our embassy in Washington DC is in contact with US authorities, who assured us of appropriate action,” MEA spokesperson Arindam Bagchi mentioned throughout a press briefing.

    Bagchi additionally mentioned that the US authorities have assured that perpetrators can be held liable and stringent motion underneath their laws shall be taken.

    “Our embassy and consulate in New York are trying their best effort in the investigation and will give assistance to the family members. They are in touch with family members and have close contacts,” the MEA spokesperson mentioned.

    Kaur was allegedly tortured by her husband and died by suicide after she publicised her years of traumatic home abuse inflicted by her partner. The distressing video went viral and sparked huge outrage throughout India and overseas.

    “We are deeply saddened by the death of Mandeep Kaur in Queens, New York under the most tragic circumstances. We are in touch with the US authorities at the Federal and local levels as well as the community. We stand ready to render all assistance,” the Indian consulate in New York City tweeted whereas expressing grief over her demise.

    ALSO READ: | On Indian girl’s suicide in US, embassy expresses grief, extends help

    — ENDS —

  • Surbhi Tiwari Files FIR Against Husband And In-Laws, Accuses Them of Domestic Violence

    Surbhi Tiwari Files FIR Against Husband And In-Laws: Surbhi Tiwari has accused her husband Praveen Kumar Sinha and in-laws of home violence and dishonest. Surbhi has filed an FIR towards Praveen and her in-laws. Surbhi mentioned that Praveen’s mom and her sister-in-laws intimidated her attributable to which she filed home violence grievance towards them. Surbhi additionally instructed that the jewelry given to her on the marriage ceremony hasn’t but been returned again to her but and she or he would combat for a similar taking the authorized route because it’s her proper. Surbhi talked about that she was compelled to promote her gold ornaments for survival and medical bills. Surbhi revealed that Praveen wouldn’t let her return to Mumbai attributable to which she missed out a variety of work in each day soaps.Also Read – Delhi Man Kills Wife For Not Serving Food After Drink, Sleeps Next To Her Body; Arrested

    Surbhi Was Financially Dependent on Praveen

    Surbhi, in an interplay with ETimes mentioned, “Soon after I married, I realised Praveen and I weren’t compatible. Praveen had agreed to move to Mumbai to live with me but later refused to relocate. I wanted to continue acting but I couldn’t take up daily soaps, as I was flying with him. As a result, I was financially dependent on him and struggled for money. Besides, I wanted to start a family soon but he wasn’t keen.” Also Read – Man Arrested For Throwing Acid On Woman Colleague After She Declines Marriage Proposal in Bengaluru

    Surbhi Accuses In-Laws of Domestic Abuse

    Surbhi opened up on her troubled marriage and instructed, “I have filed a complaint against Praveen, his mother and his sisters-in-law for domestic violence and intimidating me. Also, I haven’t got my stree dhan (jewellery back, which is my right. Along with the jewellery given to them and me at the wedding, I also took silverware with me. I haven’t got anything back. If I had that, I wouldn’t have to sell my gold ornaments for survival and medical expenses. I feel cheated about a lot of things. Even after suffering so much, I had planned to part ways amicably. However, Praveen told me that he would not give me a divorce and that I could move the court for it. I have now decided to take the legal route against them. I will soon file for divorce.” Also Read – Woman in UP Beaten Up Mercilessly By In-Laws For Having Only Daughters, Case Filed

    Surbhi made her tv debut in 1997 with Ghar Jamai. Surbhi appeared in a number of each day soaps akin to Shree Ganesh, Shikwah, Shagun, Hari Mirchi Lal Mirchi, Agle Janam Mohe Bitiya Hi Kijo, Do Dil Bandhe Ek Dori Se, Tota Weds Maina and Hum Aapke Ghar Mein Rehte Hain. She was final seen in Sony TV’s present Ek Rishta Saajhedari Ka.

    Surbhi tied the knot with Delhi-based pilot and businessman Praveen Kumar Sinha in 2019.

    For extra updates on Surbhi Tiwari, take a look at this house at India.com.

  • ‘They’re unimaginable’: Tesla CEO Elon Musk hopes Amber Heard and Johnny Depp ‘transfer on’

    By ANI

    WASHINGTON: With each passing day, the noise round Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s trial is rising greater than ever.

    ALSO READ| Tesla will not manufacture in India, here is why

    The latest growth comes simply the day earlier than the jury is to start deliberations within the defamation case. Elon Musk, Tesla CEO and Amber Heard’s ex-boyfriend took to Twitter, saying he hopes ‘they transfer on’ and that each the celebrities are ‘unimaginable’ at ‘their finest.’

    Responding to a tweet on Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s trial, Elon mentioned, “I hope they both move on. At their best, they are each incredible.”

    I hope they each transfer on. At their finest, they’re every unimaginable.

    — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 28, 2022

    Elon Musk and Amber Heard had been in a quick relationship after the cut up from Johnny Depp. Musk and Heard cut up in 2017 after a yr of courting. However, the couple rekindled their love in 2018 however gave up on one another after a couple of months.

    ALSO READ| Elon Musk advises Jeff Bezos to social gathering much less, work extra

    On the opposite, the Pirates of the Caribbean Star had one other model. He claimed in a lawsuit that Heard and Musk had begun courting “within a month after marriage” in February 2015.

    In 2018, Depp filed a lawsuit towards Heard for her opinion piece within the Washington Post about her turning into a sufferer of home violence. Although she by no means talked about Depp, the actor’s legal professionals declare it broken his profession and popularity.

  • Johnny Depp on stand: Ex-wife Heard’s allegations ‘heinous’

    By Associated Press

    FAIRFAX:  Actor Johnny Depp informed jurors Tuesday that he felt compelled to sue his ex-wife Amber Heard for libel out of an obsession for the reality after she accused him of home violence.

    “My goal is the truth because it killed me that all these people I had met over the years … that these people would think that I was a fraud,” he stated.

    Depp flatly denied ever hitting Heard, calling the bodily and sexual assault allegations towards him disturbing, heinous and “not based in any species of truth.” “Nothing of the kind ever happened,” Depp stated in court docket.

    Alluding to the autumn his profession has taken since Heard levied abuse allegations towards him, the previous “Pirates of the Caribbean” star stated, “it’s been six years of trying times. It’s very strange when one day you’re Cinderella, so to speak, and then in 0.6 seconds you’re Quasimodo.”

    For the primary hour-plus of testimony Tuesday, Depp gave lengthy, stream-of-consciousness solutions to questions on his childhood and his early film profession, talking in his signature deep baritone. After one lengthy reply, he admitted: “I forgot what the original question was.”

    Indeed, he acknowledged his meandering model, notably because it pertains to his writing model. He talked about his lengthy friendship and collaborations with the late gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson, and stated he sought to emulate a method that usually included brash language and adorning ideas.

    He stated that led him at instances to jot down textual content messages that he now finds embarrassing, and he apologized to the jury for the vulgar language he utilized in textual content messages launched as proof to explain Heard.

    “In the heat of the moment, in the heat of the pain I was feeling, I went to dark places,” he stated. But he stated he’d been ready for six years to inform his aspect of the story after Heard filed for divorce towards him in 2016 and sought a restraining order towards him.

    ALSO READ: Amber Heard to go on social media hiatus forward of defamation lawsuit filed by Johnny Depp

    The trial started greater than per week in the past, however, previous to Tuesday, jurors had solely seen the Hollywood star sitting silently together with his workforce of attorneys as both sides has tried to embarrass the opposite in a trial that Heard’s attorneys precisely predicted would flip right into a mudslinging cleaning soap opera.

    After denying Heard’s abuse allegations, Depp spoke at size a couple of childhood by which bodily abuse from his mom was “constant.” When he turned a father, Depp stated, he made positive his youngsters didn’t expertise that type of upbringing.

    Depp will proceed his testimony Wednesday. In Tuesday’s session, he testified primarily concerning the early years of his relationship with Heard, saying she appeared “too good to be true” at first.

    “She was attentive,” Depp stated of the girl he married in 2015. “She was loving. She was smart. She was kind. She was funny. She was understanding … We had many things in common, certain blues music … literature.”

    He stated there have been little issues, although, that gave him indications of a rocky relationship forward. She turned upset, he stated, when he broke a longtime routine by which she took off his boots for him when he got here dwelling. And he stated she was indignant when he would not go to mattress when she was prepared.

    “I didn’t understand why, as a 50-some-year-old man, I couldn’t go to sleep when I wanted to,” he stated.

    Depp, 58, stated he was cognizant of the age distinction between him and Heard, 35. “I acknowledge the fact I was the old, craggy fogey and she was this beautiful, creature,” he stated. But Depp stated that inside a 12 months and a half, it was as if Heard had change into one other individual.

    Actress Amber Heard within the courtroom throughout a listening to on the Fairfax County Circuit Court in Fairfax. (Photo | AP)

    So far, Depp’s associates, household, and workers have testified that Heard was the aggressor within the relationship, bodily attacking him on a number of events. Heard’s former private assistant testified that Heard spit within the face in a match of rage.

    Heard’s attorneys have stated Depp bodily and sexually assaulted her on a number of events, typically in conditions the place he drank a lot he later blacked out. Depp stated Heard’s allegations of his substance abuse have been “grossly embellished” and that there have been no moments the place he’s been uncontrolled.

    “I’m not some maniac who needs to be high or loaded all the time,” Depp stated, although he admitted to doing “a line or two” of cocaine with Heard’s sister, Whitney.

    The actor stated he was hooked on ache remedy, which stemmed from an harm on the set of the fourth “Pirates of the Caribbean” film. He additionally stated he took his mom’s “nerve pills” when he was a child. But Depp stated he detoxed from the ache remedy and has skilled lengthy durations of sobriety through the years.

    “The characterization of my ‘substance abuse’ that’s been delivered by Ms. Heard is grossly embellished,” Depp stated. “And I’m sorry to say, however numerous it’s simply plainly false. I believe that it was a straightforward goal for her to hit.”

    The lawsuit itself is meant to be over whether or not Heard libeled Depp when she wrote a 2018 op-ed piece in The Washington Post about home violence. In the article, Heard referred to herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.”

    She by no means talked about Depp by title, however Depp and his attorneys stated it was a transparent reference to accusations Heard made in 2016 when the couple divorced and he or she sought a restraining order towards him.

    Heard’s attorneys, who’ve filed their very own countersuit towards Depp, stated nothing within the article libels him. They say the abuse allegations are true, and that the harm to Depp’s repute — which he says bought him booted from the profitable “Pirates of the Caribbean” film franchise — got here from his personal dangerous habits.