Report Wire

Tag: Gautam Navlakha

  • Treatment, straw, books… issues Bhima Koregaon accused have requested courts for

    By PTI

    MUMBAI: The Supreme Court order allowing jailed activist Gautam Navlakha to be stored beneath home arrest for a month has dropped at the fore a number of purposes filed by the accused within the Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlinks case lamenting lack of services in jail and denial of entry to the identical.

    Besides searching for medical remedy, the accused within the case have repeatedly approached courts for permission to get books, chairs, consuming straws, spectacles and mosquito nets contained in the jail have requested courts for.

    In November 2020, accused Stan Swamy had filed an utility earlier than a particular court docket right here searching for straw and sipper on the Taloja jail in Navi Mumbai the place he’s lodged.

    In his plea, Swamy had mentioned the National Investigation Agency (NIA) seized it from him and he was unable to raise a glass as a result of Parkinson’s illness.

    The NIA, in its reply, nonetheless, mentioned it had not seized any straw and sipper glass from Swamy.

    Later, jail authorities supplied him with a straw and sipper.

    Swamy died in July 2021 at a non-public hospital right here whereas he was in judicial custody.

    In December 2020, Navlakha’s accomplice Sahba Husain mentioned the previous’s spectacles have been stolen in jail and when his household despatched him a brand new pair, the jail authorities refused to simply accept them.

    The excessive court docket had later criticised the jail authorities and mentioned all these are human issues.

    The jail authorities later accepted the pair of spectacles despatched by Navlakha’s household.

    READ HERE | Relief for Bhima Koregaon accused Gautam Navlakha as SC paves approach for home arrest

    In 2020, lawyer-activist Sudha Bharadwaj had filed an utility earlier than the particular court docket claiming she was not being allowed entry to books.

    She mentioned when books have been despatched for her, the Superintendent at Mumbai’s Byculla Jail, the place she was lodged, had refused to obtain them for her.

    The particular court docket had allowed her plea to have entry to 5 books per 30 days from exterior jail, whereas directing the jail superintendent to “carefully examine” the books to make sure they didn’t comprise any “objectionable material”.

    The court docket had additionally mentioned past the prescribed parameters to deem a e book’s content material “objectionable”, together with whether or not it’s vulgar, obscene or preaches violence, a superintendent didn’t have powers to withhold a e book from a detainee.

    In April this 12 months, Navlakha’s lawyer Yug Chaudhary had knowledgeable the Bombay High Court that jail authorities had refused handy over a e book by English writer P G Wodehouse.

    During the arguments within the excessive court docket on Navlakha’s plea searching for to be stored beneath home arrest, Chaudhary had mentioned the situation of the jail was very poor.

    The HC had then mentioned the jail authorities’ motion refusing Wodehouse’s e book was comical.

    Navlakha and co-accused Sagar Gorkhe had filed purposes within the particular court docket searching for permission to have mosquito nets contained in the jail.

    This was opposed by Taloja jail authorities citing safety considerations.

    ALSO READ | Bhima Koregaon case: Pune cop planted proof in gadgets of jailed activists, says report

    The court docket didn’t enable the pleas of Navlakha and Gorkhe, however directed the jail superintendent to take “all necessary precautions against mosquitoes, conduct fumigation, allow inmates to use repellents, ointments and incense sticks”.

    Navlakha had additionally filed one other utility within the particular court docket searching for permission to make cellphone/video calls to his kin.

    The jail authorities had contended that the ability began in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, however couldn’t be permitted to undertrials regularly.

    The court docket rejected Navlakha’s plea, following which he filed an attraction within the excessive court docket.

    Surendra Gadling, one other accused within the case, had filed an utility searching for a chair and desk citing medical illnesses, claiming he was unable to squat on the ground for lengthy with out growing ache in his again and neck.

    ALSO READ | SC grants bail to Bhima Koregaon case accused Varavara Rao on medical grounds

    Gadling had mentioned he wanted the desk and chair as he needed to examine lots since he was representing himself within the case.

    Prison authorities had opposed this plea as properly citing safety dangers.

    The court docket agreed with Gadling’s competition, observing that the allegations he has to defend himself towards are critical and there are a lot of paperwork he wants to review for hours collectively.

    Gadling was allowed a chair and desk at his price.

    Gadling had additionally sought permission to have his personal shaving equipment, which was opposed by the jail authorities.

    The court docket agreed with the jail authorities that it will pose hazard and rejected the appliance.

    MUMBAI: The Supreme Court order allowing jailed activist Gautam Navlakha to be stored beneath home arrest for a month has dropped at the fore a number of purposes filed by the accused within the Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlinks case lamenting lack of services in jail and denial of entry to the identical.

    Besides searching for medical remedy, the accused within the case have repeatedly approached courts for permission to get books, chairs, consuming straws, spectacles and mosquito nets contained in the jail have requested courts for.

    In November 2020, accused Stan Swamy had filed an utility earlier than a particular court docket right here searching for straw and sipper on the Taloja jail in Navi Mumbai the place he’s lodged.

    In his plea, Swamy had mentioned the National Investigation Agency (NIA) seized it from him and he was unable to raise a glass as a result of Parkinson’s illness.

    The NIA, in its reply, nonetheless, mentioned it had not seized any straw and sipper glass from Swamy.

    Later, jail authorities supplied him with a straw and sipper.

    Swamy died in July 2021 at a non-public hospital right here whereas he was in judicial custody.

    In December 2020, Navlakha’s accomplice Sahba Husain mentioned the previous’s spectacles have been stolen in jail and when his household despatched him a brand new pair, the jail authorities refused to simply accept them.

    The excessive court docket had later criticised the jail authorities and mentioned all these are human issues.

    The jail authorities later accepted the pair of spectacles despatched by Navlakha’s household.

    READ HERE | Relief for Bhima Koregaon accused Gautam Navlakha as SC paves approach for home arrest

    In 2020, lawyer-activist Sudha Bharadwaj had filed an utility earlier than the particular court docket claiming she was not being allowed entry to books.

    She mentioned when books have been despatched for her, the Superintendent at Mumbai’s Byculla Jail, the place she was lodged, had refused to obtain them for her.

    The particular court docket had allowed her plea to have entry to 5 books per 30 days from exterior jail, whereas directing the jail superintendent to “carefully examine” the books to make sure they didn’t comprise any “objectionable material”.

    The court docket had additionally mentioned past the prescribed parameters to deem a e book’s content material “objectionable”, together with whether or not it’s vulgar, obscene or preaches violence, a superintendent didn’t have powers to withhold a e book from a detainee.

    In April this 12 months, Navlakha’s lawyer Yug Chaudhary had knowledgeable the Bombay High Court that jail authorities had refused handy over a e book by English writer P G Wodehouse.

    During the arguments within the excessive court docket on Navlakha’s plea searching for to be stored beneath home arrest, Chaudhary had mentioned the situation of the jail was very poor.

    The HC had then mentioned the jail authorities’ motion refusing Wodehouse’s e book was comical.

    Navlakha and co-accused Sagar Gorkhe had filed purposes within the particular court docket searching for permission to have mosquito nets contained in the jail.

    This was opposed by Taloja jail authorities citing safety considerations.

    ALSO READ | Bhima Koregaon case: Pune cop planted proof in gadgets of jailed activists, says report

    The court docket didn’t enable the pleas of Navlakha and Gorkhe, however directed the jail superintendent to take “all necessary precautions against mosquitoes, conduct fumigation, allow inmates to use repellents, ointments and incense sticks”.

    Navlakha had additionally filed one other utility within the particular court docket searching for permission to make cellphone/video calls to his kin.

    The jail authorities had contended that the ability began in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, however couldn’t be permitted to undertrials regularly.

    The court docket rejected Navlakha’s plea, following which he filed an attraction within the excessive court docket.

    Surendra Gadling, one other accused within the case, had filed an utility searching for a chair and desk citing medical illnesses, claiming he was unable to squat on the ground for lengthy with out growing ache in his again and neck.

    ALSO READ | SC grants bail to Bhima Koregaon case accused Varavara Rao on medical grounds

    Gadling had mentioned he wanted the desk and chair as he needed to examine lots since he was representing himself within the case.

    Prison authorities had opposed this plea as properly citing safety dangers.

    The court docket agreed with Gadling’s competition, observing that the allegations he has to defend himself towards are critical and there are a lot of paperwork he wants to review for hours collectively.

    Gadling was allowed a chair and desk at his price.

    Gadling had additionally sought permission to have his personal shaving equipment, which was opposed by the jail authorities.

    The court docket agreed with the jail authorities that it will pose hazard and rejected the appliance.

  • Corrupt individuals are destroying the nation, get away with corruption: SC

    Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Navlakha, submitted that medical experiences present that his remedy contained in the jail isn’t doable and his shopper had alarming weight reduction.

  • Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlink case: SC considers permitting home arrest request of Gautam Navlakha

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday stated it was contemplating permitting the home arrest request of activist Gautam Navlakha incarcerated in reference to the Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlink case.

    The prime courtroom requested Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, showing for the National Investigation Agency (NIA), to hunt directions and inform it about restrictions that may be positioned on Navlakha whereas conserving him below home arrest for a couple of days.

    A bench of justices Ok M Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy stated it’s going to go the order Thursday after listening to the ASG.

    “He is a 70-year-old man. We do not know the way lengthy he’ll dwell.

    Certainly, he’s going in direction of the inevitable. It’s not that we’re going to launch him on bail.

    He is just not going to benefit from the default bail that comrade Sudha (Bharadwaj) received. We are acutely aware that we’ve got to tread rigorously.

    We agree that home arrest in its place must be used rigorously.”

    “We are involved about what restriction would you want to position. Place no matter restrictions. It’s not that he’s going to destroy the nation.

    At least let him stay below home arrest for a couple of days. Let’s attempt to work it out,” the bench stated.

    Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, showing for Navlakha, stated the medical experiences present that there isn’t any chance of him being handled in jail.

    “There’s no manner on this planet you may get this type of remedy/monitoring performed in jail.

    He’s had alarming weight reduction. This type of remedy is just not potential in jail,” Sibal stated.

    Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, showing for the NIA, submitted that there’s nothing incorrect with Navlakha.

    “We will provide mattress and cot everything. We will allow him to bring home food also,” he stated.

    The prime courtroom on September 29 had directed the Taloja jail superintendent to instantly shift Navlakha to Mumbai’s Jaslok hospital for remedy.

    It had stated receiving medical remedy is a elementary proper of a prisoner.

    The activist appealed to the apex courtroom in opposition to the April 26 order of the Bombay High Court dismissing his plea for home arrest over apprehensions of lack of ample medical and different primary services in Taloja jail close to Mumbai the place he’s lodged.

    NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday stated it was contemplating permitting the home arrest request of activist Gautam Navlakha incarcerated in reference to the Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlink case.

    The prime courtroom requested Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, showing for the National Investigation Agency (NIA), to hunt directions and inform it about restrictions that may be positioned on Navlakha whereas conserving him below home arrest for a couple of days.

    A bench of justices Ok M Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy stated it’s going to go the order Thursday after listening to the ASG.

    “He is a 70-year-old man. We do not know the way lengthy he’ll dwell.

    Certainly, he’s going in direction of the inevitable. It’s not that we’re going to launch him on bail.

    He is just not going to benefit from the default bail that comrade Sudha (Bharadwaj) received. We are acutely aware that we’ve got to tread rigorously.

    We agree that home arrest in its place must be used rigorously.”

    “We are involved about what restriction would you want to position. Place no matter restrictions. It’s not that he’s going to destroy the nation.

    At least let him stay below home arrest for a couple of days. Let’s attempt to work it out,” the bench stated.

    Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, showing for Navlakha, stated the medical experiences present that there isn’t any chance of him being handled in jail.

    “There’s no manner on this planet you may get this type of remedy/monitoring performed in jail.

    He’s had alarming weight reduction. This type of remedy is just not potential in jail,” Sibal stated.

    Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, showing for the NIA, submitted that there’s nothing incorrect with Navlakha.

    “We will provide mattress and cot everything. We will allow him to bring home food also,” he stated.

    The prime courtroom on September 29 had directed the Taloja jail superintendent to instantly shift Navlakha to Mumbai’s Jaslok hospital for remedy.

    It had stated receiving medical remedy is a elementary proper of a prisoner.

    The activist appealed to the apex courtroom in opposition to the April 26 order of the Bombay High Court dismissing his plea for home arrest over apprehensions of lack of ample medical and different primary services in Taloja jail close to Mumbai the place he’s lodged.

  • Bhima Koregaon case: SC orders jailed activist Navlakha’s therapy at Mumbai’s Jaslok Hospital

    By ANI

    NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Taloja jail superintendent to instantly shift activist Gautam Navlakha, jailed in reference to the Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlink case, to Mumbai’s Jaslok hospital for therapy.

    The prime court docket mentioned receiving medical therapy is a elementary proper of a prisoner.

    A bench of Justices Okay M Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy additionally allowed Navlakha’s accomplice Sabha Husain and sister to satisfy him within the hospital.

    “Having heard the counsel for parties, we are of the view that receiving medical treatment would be a fundamental right. We direct that the petitioner be taken immediately for thorough medical check-up. Accordingly, we direct Superintendent Taloja jail to take the petitioner to Jaslok hospital so that he is able to undergo requisite medical check up and receive treatment. We make it clear that the petitioner will remain in police custody,” the bench mentioned.

    The 70-year-old activist has appealed the apex court docket towards the April 26 order of the Bombay High Court dismissing his plea for home arrest over apprehensions of lack of sufficient medical and different fundamental services in Taloja jail close to Mumbai the place he’s lodged.

    NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday directed the Taloja jail superintendent to instantly shift activist Gautam Navlakha, jailed in reference to the Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlink case, to Mumbai’s Jaslok hospital for therapy.

    The prime court docket mentioned receiving medical therapy is a elementary proper of a prisoner.

    A bench of Justices Okay M Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy additionally allowed Navlakha’s accomplice Sabha Husain and sister to satisfy him within the hospital.

    “Having heard the counsel for parties, we are of the view that receiving medical treatment would be a fundamental right. We direct that the petitioner be taken immediately for thorough medical check-up. Accordingly, we direct Superintendent Taloja jail to take the petitioner to Jaslok hospital so that he is able to undergo requisite medical check up and receive treatment. We make it clear that the petitioner will remain in police custody,” the bench mentioned.

    The 70-year-old activist has appealed the apex court docket towards the April 26 order of the Bombay High Court dismissing his plea for home arrest over apprehensions of lack of sufficient medical and different fundamental services in Taloja jail close to Mumbai the place he’s lodged.

  • Bhima Koregaon case: Justice Ravindra Bhat withdraws from listening to plea of Gautam Navlakha

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Supreme Court choose Justice S Ravindra Bhat on Monday recused from listening to jailed activist Gautam Navlakha’s plea that he be positioned beneath home custody as a substitute of judicial custody within the Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad case.

    As the listening to began, Justice Bhat, who was on the bench with Chief Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, expressed his incapacity to be a part of the listening to however didn’t elaborate on the explanation.

    The 70-year-old activist has appealed to the highest courtroom in opposition to the April 26 order of the Bombay High Court dismissing his plea.

    The excessive courtroom had stated that his apprehensions in regards to the lack of medical support and insufficient primary amenities on the Taloja jail, the place he’s at the moment lodged as an undertrial, had been “ill-founded.”

    Recently, 82-year-old activist P Varavara Rao was granted bail within the case by the apex courtroom.

    “Justice Bhat cannot hear. This case is not to be listed before a bench with Justice Bhat. List before me on the administrative side. This case was listed before me and Justice KM Joseph last. We will have this case listed before a bench with Justice Joseph,” the CJI stated within the order on Navlakha’s attraction.

    ALSO READ | ‘Hypertension, diabetes are frequent’: NIA opposes activist Gautam Navlakha’s plea for home arrest

    Navlakha had informed the excessive courtroom that Taloja jail is overcrowded and the situations and surroundings of the jail should not suitable together with his well being.

    “The case of the petitioner does not fit in any of the criteria (provided for by SC). The apprehension of the petitioner that he will not be provided medical aid and his life will be miserable in unhygienic conditions and atmosphere of the prison seems to be ill-founded,” the excessive courtroom had stated.

    Navlakha had approached HC earlier saying that the Taloja jail had poor amenities.

    He had stated that he had been denied a chair, a pair of slippers, his spectacles, and a PG Wodehouse ebook by the jail superintendent.

    Navlakha had additionally stated that the jail bathrooms had been soiled and whereas in jail, his well being situation had deteriorated.

    Besides Rao, the one accused on bail within the case is an activist and lawyer Sudha Bharadwaj.

    The Bombay High Court had granted aid to Bharadwaj final 12 months.

    The case pertains to alleged inflammatory speeches made on the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017, which the police claimed triggered violence the following day close to the Koregaon-Bhima conflict memorial on the outskirts of the western Maharashtra metropolis.

    The Pune Police had additionally claimed that the conclave was organised by individuals with alleged Maoist hyperlinks.

    The National Investigation Agency (NIA) later took over the probe within the matter.

    Several activists and academicians have been arrested within the case together with Sudhir Dhawale, Shoma Sen, Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira and Gautam Navlakha.

    NEW DELHI: Supreme Court choose Justice S Ravindra Bhat on Monday recused from listening to jailed activist Gautam Navlakha’s plea that he be positioned beneath home custody as a substitute of judicial custody within the Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad case.

    As the listening to began, Justice Bhat, who was on the bench with Chief Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, expressed his incapacity to be a part of the listening to however didn’t elaborate on the explanation.

    The 70-year-old activist has appealed to the highest courtroom in opposition to the April 26 order of the Bombay High Court dismissing his plea.

    The excessive courtroom had stated that his apprehensions in regards to the lack of medical support and insufficient primary amenities on the Taloja jail, the place he’s at the moment lodged as an undertrial, had been “ill-founded.”

    Recently, 82-year-old activist P Varavara Rao was granted bail within the case by the apex courtroom.

    “Justice Bhat cannot hear. This case is not to be listed before a bench with Justice Bhat. List before me on the administrative side. This case was listed before me and Justice KM Joseph last. We will have this case listed before a bench with Justice Joseph,” the CJI stated within the order on Navlakha’s attraction.

    ALSO READ | ‘Hypertension, diabetes are frequent’: NIA opposes activist Gautam Navlakha’s plea for home arrest

    Navlakha had informed the excessive courtroom that Taloja jail is overcrowded and the situations and surroundings of the jail should not suitable together with his well being.

    “The case of the petitioner does not fit in any of the criteria (provided for by SC). The apprehension of the petitioner that he will not be provided medical aid and his life will be miserable in unhygienic conditions and atmosphere of the prison seems to be ill-founded,” the excessive courtroom had stated.

    Navlakha had approached HC earlier saying that the Taloja jail had poor amenities.

    He had stated that he had been denied a chair, a pair of slippers, his spectacles, and a PG Wodehouse ebook by the jail superintendent.

    Navlakha had additionally stated that the jail bathrooms had been soiled and whereas in jail, his well being situation had deteriorated.

    Besides Rao, the one accused on bail within the case is an activist and lawyer Sudha Bharadwaj.

    The Bombay High Court had granted aid to Bharadwaj final 12 months.

    The case pertains to alleged inflammatory speeches made on the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017, which the police claimed triggered violence the following day close to the Koregaon-Bhima conflict memorial on the outskirts of the western Maharashtra metropolis.

    The Pune Police had additionally claimed that the conclave was organised by individuals with alleged Maoist hyperlinks.

    The National Investigation Agency (NIA) later took over the probe within the matter.

    Several activists and academicians have been arrested within the case together with Sudhir Dhawale, Shoma Sen, Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira and Gautam Navlakha.

  • Supreme Court dismisses bail plea of activist Gautam Navlakha in Bhima Koregaon case

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea of activist Gautam Navlakha, searching for bail within the Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlink case of Bhima Koregaon in Maharashtra.
    A bench of justices UU Lalit and Okay M Joseph dismissed the enchantment of Navlakha in opposition to the Bombay High Court order denying him bail within the case.
    Justice Joseph, who pronounced the decision for the bench, stated the courtroom is dismissing the enchantment of Navlakha.
    On March 26, the highest courtroom had reserved its verdict on a plea of Navlakha.

    The prime courtroom had on March 3 sought response from the NIA on Navlakha’s plea during which he has claimed that the cost sheet was not filed inside the stipulated time interval and therefore, he was entitled for default bail.
    The FIR in opposition to him was re-registered in January 2020, and Navlakha had surrendered earlier than the NIA on April 14, final 12 months.
    He had spent 11 days within the NIA’s custody until April 25, and since then he’s in judicial custody.
    According to the prosecution, some activists allegedly made inflammatory speeches and provocative statements on the Elgar Parishad meet in Pune on December 31, 2017, which triggered violence at Koregaon Bhima within the district the subsequent day.
    It has additionally alleged that the occasion was backed by some Maoist teams.

    On February 8, the excessive courtroom had dismissed Navlakha’s plea saying that “it sees no reason to interfere with a special court’s order which earlier rejected his bail plea”.
    Navlakha had approached the excessive courtroom final 12 months, difficult the particular NIA courtroom’s order of July 12, 2020 that rejected his plea for statutory bail.
    On December 16 final 12 months, the excessive courtroom bench reserved its verdict on the plea filed by Navlakha, searching for statutory or default bail on the grounds that he had been in custody for over 90 days, however the prosecution didn’t file a cost sheet within the case inside this era.
    The NIA had argued that his plea was not maintainable, and sought an extension of time to file the cost sheet.
    The particular courtroom had then accepted NIA’s plea searching for extension of 90 to 180 days to file the cost sheet in opposition to Navlakha and his co-accused, activist Dr Anand Teltumbde. Navlakha had earlier already argued that he has spent 93 days in custody, together with 34 days of home arrest, and that the excessive courtroom should depend home arrest as a interval of custody.
    While he was beneath home arrest, Navlakha’s private liberties remained curtailed, his counsel had submitted.
    The NIA had earlier argued that Navlakha’s home arrest couldn’t be included within the time spent within the custody of police or NIA, or beneath judicial custody.

    It had submitted that the Pune police arrested Navlakha in August 2018, however had not taken him into custody.
    It had stated that Navlakha remained beneath home arrest, and the Delhi High Court quashed his arrest and remand order in October 2018.

  • SC reserves order on Gautam Navlakha’s bail plea

    The Supreme Court Friday reserved its order on a petition filed by activist Gautam Navlakha difficult a Bombay High Court order rejecting his plea for statutory bail within the Bhima Koreagon violence case.
    The HC, which had rejected his plea on February 8, had mentioned “it sees no reason to interfere with a special court’s order which earlier rejected his bail plea”. It was referring to a particular National Investigation Agency (NIA) courtroom’s July 12, 2020 ruling that rejected his default bail plea. Navlakha subsequently moved the apex courtroom on February 19.
    A 3 choose bench comprising Justices U U Lalit, Indira Banerjee and Ok M Joseph, which is listening to the matter, had issued discover to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on the plea earlier this month.
    Navlakha, 69, is lodged at Taloja Central jail. He has been in search of statutory bail beneath the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) on the bottom that the NIA didn’t file the chargesheet throughout the stipulated 90-day interval, making him entitled for grant of default bail.
    The NIA, nevertheless, claimed that the interval of 34 days of Navlakha’s home arrest between August 29 and October 1, 2018, was termed “illegal”by the Delhi High Court and therefore couldn’t be included within the interval of detention.

  • Bhima Koregaon case: SC to listen to bail plea of activist Gautam Navlakha on March 3

    The Supreme Court is scheduled to listen to on Wednesday the bail plea of activist Gautam Navlakha within the alleged Elgar Parishad-Maoist hyperlink case.
    The activist, on February 19, had moved the highest courtroom in opposition to the Bombay High Court order of February 8 dismissing his bail plea. The excessive courtroom had mentioned that “it sees no reason to interfere with a special court’s order which earlier rejected his bail plea”.
    A 3 choose bench of the apex courtroom comprising justices U U Lalit, Indira Banerjee and Ok M Joseph would take up the enchantment of Navlakha for listening to on March 3 in opposition to the excessive courtroom’s order.
    According to police, some activists allegedly made inflammatory speeches and provocative statements on the Elgar Parishad meet in Pune on December 31, 2017, which triggered violence at Koregaon Bhima within the district the subsequent day.

    Police additionally alleged that the occasion was backed by some Maoist teams.
    The National Investigation Agency (NIA) is conducting a probe into the case.
    Navlakha had approached the excessive courtroom final yr, difficult the particular NIA courtroom’s order of July 12, 2020 that rejected his plea for statutory bail.

    On December 16 final yr, the excessive courtroom bench reserved its verdict on the plea filed by Navlakha, searching for statutory or default bail on grounds that he had been in custody for over 90 days, however the prosecution did not file a cost sheet within the case inside this era.
    The NIA had argued that his plea was not maintainable, and sought an extension to file the cost sheet.
    The particular courtroom had then accepted NIA’s plea searching for extension of 90 to 180 days to file the cost sheet in opposition to Navlakha and his co-accused, activist Dr Anand Teltumbde.
    Navlakha’s counsel had advised the excessive courtroom that the NIA was granted the extension to file its cost sheet.
    Senior advocate Kapil Sibal had mentioned Navlakha had already spent 93 days in custody, together with 34 days of home arrest, and that the excessive courtroom should rely home arrest as a interval of custody.
    While he was beneath home arrest, Navlakha’s private liberties remained curtailed, Sibal had mentioned.
    However, Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, who appeared for the NIA, had argued that Navlakha’s home arrest couldn’t be included within the time spent within the custody of police or NIA, or beneath judicial custody.
    Raju argued that the Pune police arrested Navlakha in August 2018, however had not taken him into custody.
    He mentioned the accused remained beneath home arrest, and the Delhi High Court quashed his arrest and remand order in October 2018.
    The FIR in opposition to him was re-registered in January 2020, and Navlakha surrendered earlier than the NIA on April 14.
    He spent 11 days within the NIA’s custody until April 25, and since then he in judicial custody within the Taloja jail in neighbouring Navi Mumbai.

    Raju had argued that if the courtroom “looked from the other angle, it would see that if he (Navlakha) was arrested on August 28, 2018, he should have been enlarged on bail.”
    “He was a free man till April 2020. He was neither on bail nor in custody. There cannot be a gap in the custody and detention period,” Raju had mentioned.