Report Wire

Tag: hindu muslim marriage

  • Auraiya: A girl has no caste, BJP MLA obtained a Muslim lady married to a Hindu boy

    Vishal Verma, Jalaun: A case of a singular marriage has come to mild in Auraiya district of Uttar Pradesh. The Muslim lady talked to the BJP MLA on the telephone and requested her to marry her lover. He additionally expressed the purpose of dying if he didn’t get married. After listening to the lady’s phrases, the MLA obtained the loving {couples} married within the temple in response to Hindu customs.

    Actually, the entire matter is said to Bharrapur village of Phaphund police station space of ​​Auraiya. A novel marriage has been witnessed within the temple established right here, by which the bride belonged to the Muslim group and the groom belonged to the Hindu group. This marriage just isn’t a standard marriage, however Sadar MLA Gudiya Katheria herself obtained this marriage finished. Such marriage has turn out to be a subject of debate within the village. At the identical time, the police drive was additionally deployed when it comes to safety preparations.

    The girlfriend had advised the story of affection on the MLA’s telephone, whereas BJP Sadar MLA Gudiya Katheria advised that she acquired a name from her bride-turned-girlfriend, on which she advised about her love, on which the MLA referred to as her girlfriend and understood the entire matter. On this, the MLA referred to as the lover and stated that if the wedding doesn’t occur, she’s going to die. After this, Sadar MLA talked to the kinfolk of the lover and satisfied them and obtained them married. On this event, the MLA stated that this village is ours and a girl has no caste. At the identical time, after the wedding, the bride and groom fortunately spoke and accepted this marriage.

  • Gujarat High Court pulls up police for arresting interfaith couple, orders their launch

    A DIVISION bench of the Gujarat High Court has come to the rescue of an interfaith couple from Banaskantha who had married allegedly towards the desires of the lady’s father and have been despatched to police custody for greater than per week.
    The courtroom Tuesday ordered they be instantly produced earlier than the HC bench and launched from police custody.
    The division bench, led by Justice Sonia Gokani, recorded the general public prosecutor’s assurance that the couple, who now wish to reside in Surat, shall be granted police safety “initially for a period of four weeks” by the Surat metropolis police commissioner, whereafter the police commissioner shall resolve whether or not the identical requires to be continued or not.
    The couple had obtained married on December 30 at a temple in Rajasthan’s Abu Road and subsequently travelled to Kerala for his or her honeymoon. In the primary week of January, the Gujarat Police travelled to Kerala and introduced them again to Palanpur. The two have been separated and despatched to totally different police stations
    — Palanpur East and Palanpur West. They have been formally arrested on January 15 after an FIR was FIR on the idea of a criticism submitted by the lady’s father at Palanpur East police station.

    The lady is employed as a piece officer on contract with the taluka panchayat workplace in Palanpur. In his criticism, her father alleged that she stole Rs 82,000 from the household’s residence earlier than operating away, getting married fraudulently and acquiring a faux marriage certificates.
    On January 18, a habeas corpus petition was moved by the brother of the 30-year-old man, who’s a street transport officer in RTO Surat, stating that the latter was illegally detained, arrested and remanded to police custody, following his current marriage to his 29-year-old childhood buddy from one other group.
    Hearing the petition Tuesday, the division bench quashed and put aside the four-day remand order, dated January 18 to 22. The courtroom directed the Range IG of the jurisdiction involved “to inquire into the matter, more particularly, considering the conduct of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 (police inspectors of Palanpur East and West police stations), in whose custody, the couple has been detained for all these days, and report to the DIG”.
    The courtroom expressed its dissatisfaction with the overreach the place the police exercised “undue fervour”, with the officers travelling to Kerala to take a consensually married couple into custody.
    The order additional notes in its path to the Range IG: “While conducting such inquiry, the Range IG concerned shall bear in mind that this is the case where undue fervour is shown on account of this being an inter-religion marriage, so also the golden words of the Supreme Court in such matters…”
    According to lawyer NK Majumdar, representing the petitioner, the daddy of the lady was against the wedding. The FIR additionally names the registrar as an accused, he stated.
    “Gujarat Police went by flight to Kerala to take the couple into their custody and then travelled back by road to Palanpur where the husband-wife were kept at two separate police stations. Both were named as accused in the FIR. The woman was pressured to not continue with the relationship but she remained adamant. A contention was raised by the petitioner that how could his brother be taken into custody even before the FIR was registered. As per the prosecution’s case, they were taken into custody in Kerala on January 12 and brought to Palanpur and arrested on January 15. But as per the petitioner, they were brought to Palanpur on January 12 and continued to be in illegal detention until January 15, when the FIR came to be registered,” Majumdar stated.
    On January 4, the lady had additionally written to the police authorities that she was married and had left residence of her personal volition. “Hearing the habeas corpus petition, the court directed that the two be produced (before it). The bench spoke to both of them in confidentiality, first separately to each of the two parties, and then together,” Majmudar stated.