Report Wire

Tag: Interim relief

  • NCLAT refuses interim aid to Google on Rs 936-crore penalty imposed by CCI

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal on Wednesday declined to grant interim aid to Google in search of a keep on competitors watchdog CCI’s penalty of Rs 936.44 crore on the tech big for abusing its dominant place with respect to Play Store insurance policies.

    The appellate tribunal has directed Google to deposit 10 per cent of the wonderful earlier than its registry within the subsequent 4 weeks.

    A two-member bench comprising Justice Rakesh Kumar and Alok Srivastava issued notices to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and different respondents and posted the matter for listening to on April 17, 2023.

    Last week, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) additionally declined to remain one other CCI order, wherein it had slapped a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on Google for anti-competitive practices in relation to Android cellular gadgets.

    Google was fined over Rs 2,200 crore in two CCI rulings lower than every week aside in October, marking a setback for the tech titan in some of the promising digital markets globally.

    On October 25, CCI had slapped a penalty of Rs 936.44 crore on Google for abusing its dominant place with respect to its Play Store insurance policies.

    The regulator has additionally directed the corporate to stop and desist from unfair enterprise practices in addition to perform varied measures to handle the anti-competitive points inside an outlined timeline.

    Google had subsequently mentioned it’s “pausing” enforcement of the requirement for builders to make use of Play’s billing system for the acquisition of digital items and companies for transactions by customers in India whereas it opinions authorized choices, within the aftermath of the current ruling by the CCI.

    “Following the CCI’s recent ruling, we are pausing enforcement of the requirement for developers to use Google Play’s billing system for the purchase of digital goods and services for transactions by users in India while we review our legal options and ensure we can continue to invest in Android and Play,” Google mentioned in an replace on assist centre web page on November 1.

    The search engine big has confronted criticism globally for mandating software program builders utilizing its app retailer to solely use its proprietary in-app cost system that cost a fee of as much as 30 per cent on purchases made inside an app.

    Google can be dealing with a separate probe into its enterprise conduct within the information content material and Smart TV market in India.

    The Competition Commission had additionally slapped a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on the tech main for anti-competitive practices in relation to Android cellular gadgets. Google had filed appeals earlier than the NCLAT towards the 2 orders of CCI in October.

    On January 4, whereas listening to the attraction within the Android matter, the appellate tribunal refused an interim keep on the competitors regulator imposing a Rs 1,337-crore penalty and requested the US tech big to deposit 10 per cent of the quantity.

    NCLAT admitted the search big’s problem to the CCI slapping Rs 1,337.76-crore wonderful for abusing the dominant place of its Android smartphone working system within the nation.

    NEW DELHI: The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal on Wednesday declined to grant interim aid to Google in search of a keep on competitors watchdog CCI’s penalty of Rs 936.44 crore on the tech big for abusing its dominant place with respect to Play Store insurance policies.

    The appellate tribunal has directed Google to deposit 10 per cent of the wonderful earlier than its registry within the subsequent 4 weeks.

    A two-member bench comprising Justice Rakesh Kumar and Alok Srivastava issued notices to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and different respondents and posted the matter for listening to on April 17, 2023.

    Last week, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) additionally declined to remain one other CCI order, wherein it had slapped a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on Google for anti-competitive practices in relation to Android cellular gadgets.

    Google was fined over Rs 2,200 crore in two CCI rulings lower than every week aside in October, marking a setback for the tech titan in some of the promising digital markets globally.

    On October 25, CCI had slapped a penalty of Rs 936.44 crore on Google for abusing its dominant place with respect to its Play Store insurance policies.

    The regulator has additionally directed the corporate to stop and desist from unfair enterprise practices in addition to perform varied measures to handle the anti-competitive points inside an outlined timeline.

    Google had subsequently mentioned it’s “pausing” enforcement of the requirement for builders to make use of Play’s billing system for the acquisition of digital items and companies for transactions by customers in India whereas it opinions authorized choices, within the aftermath of the current ruling by the CCI.

    “Following the CCI’s recent ruling, we are pausing enforcement of the requirement for developers to use Google Play’s billing system for the purchase of digital goods and services for transactions by users in India while we review our legal options and ensure we can continue to invest in Android and Play,” Google mentioned in an replace on assist centre web page on November 1.

    The search engine big has confronted criticism globally for mandating software program builders utilizing its app retailer to solely use its proprietary in-app cost system that cost a fee of as much as 30 per cent on purchases made inside an app.

    Google can be dealing with a separate probe into its enterprise conduct within the information content material and Smart TV market in India.

    The Competition Commission had additionally slapped a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on the tech main for anti-competitive practices in relation to Android cellular gadgets. Google had filed appeals earlier than the NCLAT towards the 2 orders of CCI in October.

    On January 4, whereas listening to the attraction within the Android matter, the appellate tribunal refused an interim keep on the competitors regulator imposing a Rs 1,337-crore penalty and requested the US tech big to deposit 10 per cent of the quantity.

    NCLAT admitted the search big’s problem to the CCI slapping Rs 1,337.76-crore wonderful for abusing the dominant place of its Android smartphone working system within the nation.

  • Kangana Ranaut vs BMC: Bombay HC Grants Relief To Actor, Says ‘No Coercive Action Till February 5’

    The Bombay High Court on Tuesday continued an interim order handed by the civil court docket. It restrained the Mumbai civic physique from taking any motion towards alleged irregularities at Kangana Ranaut’s Mumbai flats until February 5, 2021. The court docket additionally directed her to tell by then if she would apply to the BMC looking for regularisation of the unauthorised alternations at her Khar home. Also Read – Kangana Ranaut Gets Trolled For Calling Rihanna a ‘Fool’ in a Tweet Over Farmers’ Protests In March 2018, BMC had issued a discover to Kangana for an alleged unlawful merger of three flats owned by her on the Orchid Breeze constructing in Khar, Mumbai. However, the civil court docket dismissed her go well with towards the discover in December and he or she moved to the excessive court docket. While dismissing the go well with, the civil court docket noticed that there was a ‘grave violation of the sanctioned plan’ whereas merging the three flats. Also Read – ‘Why Aren’t We Talking About This’: Rihanna Tweets on Farmers’ Protest, Kangana Ranaut Calls Her Fool Senior Advocate, Birendra Saraf, showing on behalf of her, sought to remain demolition work stating that BMC’s motion towards her was nothing however ‘vendetta’ and he or she sought time from the court docket to use for regularisation of the unlawful portion of her flat. Also Read – Kangana Ranaut Gifts Luxury Flats Worth Rs 4 Cr to Her Sister Rangoli Chandel And Cousins in Chandigarh

    Appearing for BMC, Senior lawyer Aspi Chinoy, advised the court docket, “She has to apply for regularisation within the period stipulated in the notice and she is already three years later, while the notice had given only 30 days. The time of application can be extended only after the Court condones the delay.” Saraf urged the court docket to maintain Kangana’s attraction pending within the court docket. He mentioned, “I am conceding that there is no other option but I cannot do that without taking written instructions from my client and I would require two days. My client’s regularisation depends on consent of the other members of the building” Justice Chavan famous, “In any case, the entire structure will have to be regularised. If she says that she will go for regularisation, then this challenge in Court will have to go. This is an individual case. Not a group case. She (Kangana) has to speak for herself and cannot seek time for everyone else. In the interest of justice, liberty granted to Saraf to seek instructions from Ranaut as to whether a single applicant will apply for regularisation of the structure.”