By PTI
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The Students Federation on India (SFI), the scholars’ wing of the ruling CPI(M), which was drawing flak from numerous corners over an alleged mark checklist controversy, on Friday challenged the opposition Congress and its college students’ wing Kerala Students Union (KSU) to provide proof in opposition to it as claimed by them and termed the problem as an try and tarnish the organisation’s picture.
An issue erupted just lately after a mark checklist confirmed that SFI state secretary P M Arsho, a scholar of Maharajas College in Ernakulam, had “passed” although he didn’t attend any examination.
In one other incident, Okay Vidhya, a former activist of the Left-wing college students’ outfit, additionally landed in bother after she was discovered to have solid a faux expertise certificates from Maharajas College to safe a educating job at one other faculty.
Reacting to the mark checklist incident, Arsho at the moment mentioned the faculty had made it clear that it was a technical error.”There was a conspiracy and it should be brought out. Normally, when a result is out, the college authorities crosscheck it physically and publish the results. In this matter, my name was included in a mark list of a batch that I am not part of. And then the KSU finds the said mark list. There was a conspiracy behind it and the probe will bring out the culprits,” Arsho informed the media right here.
Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition, V D Satheesan at the moment attacked State Higher Education Minister R Bindu and mentioned she gave a clear chit to the SFI state secretary even earlier than the probe has concluded.
ALSO READ | Mark checklist controversy: Arsho alleges conspiracy, Maharaja blames tech glitch
“When an investigation is going on, the Higher Education Minister is acquitting the state secretary. It’s highly unusual. Now, how will the officials of the department, who are conducting the probe, do the investigation impartially?” Satheesan requested.
Satheesan alleged that the Minister was influencing the probe.
“It was the SFI state secretary, who made the fake experience certificate. Now they are trying to save the state secretary and put the blame on the girl,” Satheesan claimed.
Arsho mentioned regardless of clarifying that many different names additionally popped up within the outcome printed by the National Informatic Centre (NIC), the media and the opposition weren’t able to appropriate their stand.
Arsho mentioned the controversies have been an try and tarnish the picture of SFI.
“For the past few days, despite clarifying that I have no role in the matter, SFI is being targeted. This was a move to tarnish the image of SFI. The media, despite the clarification, refuses to correct their news,” he mentioned.
When requested concerning the faux expertise certificates matter, Arsho mentioned the SFI had made its stand clear.
“There is no need to link the SFI in this matter. It’s an act committed by an individual and there is no need to link SFI to it. If the Congress or the KSU have evidence against me or the SFI in that matter, they should release them,” Arsho challenged.
KSU had alleged that within the mark checklist of the third-semester archaeology examination checklist, it was proven that Arsho had handed the examination although he didn’t seem for it.
However, later, the faculty clarified that his title was seen amongst one other batch’s outcome and clarified it as a technical error.
The opposition had additional alleged that Vidhya additionally bought the assistance of the SFI management in forging the faux expertise certificates.
The CPI(M) had made it clear that if anybody had performed something unlawful, she or he ought to must face authorized proceedings, and there was no want for the celebration to guard anybody.
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The Students Federation on India (SFI), the scholars’ wing of the ruling CPI(M), which was drawing flak from numerous corners over an alleged mark checklist controversy, on Friday challenged the opposition Congress and its college students’ wing Kerala Students Union (KSU) to provide proof in opposition to it as claimed by them and termed the problem as an try and tarnish the organisation’s picture.
An issue erupted just lately after a mark checklist confirmed that SFI state secretary P M Arsho, a scholar of Maharajas College in Ernakulam, had “passed” although he didn’t attend any examination.
In one other incident, Okay Vidhya, a former activist of the Left-wing college students’ outfit, additionally landed in bother after she was discovered to have solid a faux expertise certificates from Maharajas College to safe a educating job at one other faculty.googletag.cmd.push(perform() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
Reacting to the mark checklist incident, Arsho at the moment mentioned the faculty had made it clear that it was a technical error.”There was a conspiracy and it should be brought out. Normally, when a result is out, the college authorities crosscheck it physically and publish the results. In this matter, my name was included in a mark list of a batch that I am not part of. And then the KSU finds the said mark list. There was a conspiracy behind it and the probe will bring out the culprits,” Arsho informed the media right here.
Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition, V D Satheesan at the moment attacked State Higher Education Minister R Bindu and mentioned she gave a clear chit to the SFI state secretary even earlier than the probe has concluded.
ALSO READ | Mark checklist controversy: Arsho alleges conspiracy, Maharaja blames tech glitch
“When an investigation is going on, the Higher Education Minister is acquitting the state secretary. It’s highly unusual. Now, how will the officials of the department, who are conducting the probe, do the investigation impartially?” Satheesan requested.
Satheesan alleged that the Minister was influencing the probe.
“It was the SFI state secretary, who made the fake experience certificate. Now they are trying to save the state secretary and put the blame on the girl,” Satheesan claimed.
Arsho mentioned regardless of clarifying that many different names additionally popped up within the outcome printed by the National Informatic Centre (NIC), the media and the opposition weren’t able to appropriate their stand.
Arsho mentioned the controversies have been an try and tarnish the picture of SFI.
“For the past few days, despite clarifying that I have no role in the matter, SFI is being targeted. This was a move to tarnish the image of SFI. The media, despite the clarification, refuses to correct their news,” he mentioned.
When requested concerning the faux expertise certificates matter, Arsho mentioned the SFI had made its stand clear.
“There is no need to link the SFI in this matter. It’s an act committed by an individual and there is no need to link SFI to it. If the Congress or the KSU have evidence against me or the SFI in that matter, they should release them,” Arsho challenged.
KSU had alleged that within the mark checklist of the third-semester archaeology examination checklist, it was proven that Arsho had handed the examination although he didn’t seem for it.
However, later, the faculty clarified that his title was seen amongst one other batch’s outcome and clarified it as a technical error.
The opposition had additional alleged that Vidhya additionally bought the assistance of the SFI management in forging the faux expertise certificates.
The CPI(M) had made it clear that if anybody had performed something unlawful, she or he ought to must face authorized proceedings, and there was no want for the celebration to guard anybody.