Report Wire

Tag: triple talaq

  • Centre recordsdata latest affidavit in SC over triple talaq; says ban didn’t act as ‘deterrent’

    Express News Service

    NEW DELHI: Centre has educated Supreme Court that irrespective of the best court docket docket isolating the apply of triple talaq throughout the 2017 Shayra Bano ruling and assurance of All India Muslim Personal Law Board, there have been experiences of divorce by way of triple talaq from completely completely different parts of the nation and SCs ruling has not labored as “deterrent.”

    Centre has knowledgeable SC {{that a}} should introduce Muslim (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 was felt since number of divorces weren’t launched down and state movement was required for not solely giving influence to SCs 2017 ruling nevertheless to moreover redress the grievances of victims of illegal divorce. It was extra acknowledged throughout the affidavit that the police throughout the absence of punitive provisions have been helpless and no movement might presumably be taken in opposition to the errant husband. 

    “In spite of the above-mentioned judgment of this Hon’ble Court setting aside triple talaq and the submissions made by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board in their counter affidavit filed before this Hon’ble Court in the Shayara Bano case, inter alia, stating that they would prescribe guidelines to be followed in matters of divorce, emphasising that talaq-e-bidder be avoided by Muslim husbands, there have been reports from various parts of the country that the Muslim husbands have been resorting to divorce by the way of ‘talaq-e-biddat’ It was also reported in various news channels and dailies that even educated persons were resorting to divorce their wives by adopting instantaneous and irrevocable talaq (talaq-e-biddat),” the affidavit states. 

    It was extra acknowledged, “In the absence of any punitive provisions in the extant laws, the police were helpless and no action could be taken against the errant husbands. In view of these, in order to protect the rights of married Muslim women who were being divorced by triple talaq, an Ordinance, namely, the Muslim: Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2018 under Article 123 of the Constitution was promulgated by the President on 19th September, 2018 and was later enacted as the Muslim Women(Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 so as to ensure the larger constitutional goals of gender justice and gender equality of married Muslim women and also to help subserve their fundamental rights of non-discrimination and empowerment guaranteed under the Constitution.”

    The response has been filed throughout the batch of pleas trying to find to declare the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019 as unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14,15, 21 and 25. Notably, SC in Shayra Bano case by way of 3:2 majority had put apart the apply of triple talaq by certain Muslim husbands to divorce their wives. Laying emphasis on the reality that as a result of the bill handed by the Parliament has been utilized by way of an Muslim (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 centre has argued that the pleas shouldn’t maintainable and have become infructuous. 

    NEW DELHI: Centre has educated Supreme Court that irrespective of the best court docket docket isolating the apply of triple talaq throughout the 2017 Shayra Bano ruling and assurance of All India Muslim Personal Law Board, there have been experiences of divorce by way of triple talaq from completely completely different parts of the nation and SCs ruling has not labored as “deterrent.”

    Centre has knowledgeable SC {{that a}} should introduce Muslim (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 was felt since number of divorces weren’t launched down and state movement was required for not solely giving influence to SCs 2017 ruling nevertheless to moreover redress the grievances of victims of illegal divorce. It was extra acknowledged throughout the affidavit that the police throughout the absence of punitive provisions have been helpless and no movement might presumably be taken in opposition to the errant husband. 

    “In spite of the above-mentioned judgment of this Hon’ble Court setting aside triple talaq and the submissions made by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board in their counter affidavit filed before this Hon’ble Court in the Shayara Bano case, inter alia, stating that they would prescribe guidelines to be followed in matters of divorce, emphasising that talaq-e-bidder be avoided by Muslim husbands, there have been reports from various parts of the country that the Muslim husbands have been resorting to divorce by the way of ‘talaq-e-biddat’ It was also reported in various news channels and dailies that even educated persons were resorting to divorce their wives by adopting instantaneous and irrevocable talaq (talaq-e-biddat),” the affidavit states. googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    It was extra acknowledged, “In the absence of any punitive provisions in the extant laws, the police were helpless and no action could be taken against the errant husbands. In view of these, in order to protect the rights of married Muslim women who were being divorced by triple talaq, an Ordinance, namely, the Muslim: Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Ordinance, 2018 under Article 123 of the Constitution was promulgated by the President on 19th September, 2018 and was later enacted as the Muslim Women(Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 so as to ensure the larger constitutional goals of gender justice and gender equality of married Muslim women and also to help subserve their fundamental rights of non-discrimination and empowerment guaranteed under the Constitution.”

    The response has been filed throughout the batch of pleas trying to find to declare the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019 as unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14,15, 21 and 25. Notably, SC in Shayra Bano case by way of 3:2 majority had put apart the apply of triple talaq by certain Muslim husbands to divorce their wives. Laying emphasis on the reality that as a result of the bill handed by the Parliament has been utilized by way of an Muslim (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 centre has argued that the pleas shouldn’t maintainable and have become infructuous. 

  • Odisha man fingers out ‘triple talaq’ after partner loses Rs 1.5 lakh to cyber fraud

    By PTI

    KENDRAPARA: The Odisha Police booked a 45-year-old man for allegedly handing out fast ‘triple talaq’ to his partner after she confessed to dropping Rs 1.5 lakh to cyber criminals, an official talked about on Saturday.

    The observe of ‘Triple talaq’ is illegal in India since 2017.

    A 32-year-old girl of Kendrapara district lodged a criticism with the police alleging that her husband, who’s in the mean time in Gujarat, on April 1 uttered ‘talaq’ 3 instances after determining from her over the cellphone that she misplaced Rs 1.5 lakh to cyber frauds, thus divorcing her illegally.

    The girl is married for the ultimate 15 years and mother of three teenage youngsters.

    A case was registered in the direction of the accused beneath the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, talked about Kendrapara Sadar police station Inspector Saroj Kumar Sahoo.

    The Act bans the observe of fast triple talaq and invites imprisonment of as a lot as three years.

    As the complainant acknowledged that she was moreover subjected to dowry-related torture, circumstances beneath quite a few sections of the IPC and Dowry Prevention Act have moreover been registered, Sahoo talked about.

    The particulars of how the girl misplaced the money to cyber criminals shouldn’t however clear till now.

    The Supreme Court in 2017 banned the controversial observe of fast divorce, setting it aside on numerous grounds along with that it was in the direction of the basic tenets of the Holy Quran and violated the Islamic regulation Shariat.

    KENDRAPARA: The Odisha Police booked a 45-year-old man for allegedly handing out fast ‘triple talaq’ to his partner after she confessed to dropping Rs 1.5 lakh to cyber criminals, an official talked about on Saturday.

    The observe of ‘Triple talaq’ is illegal in India since 2017.

    A 32-year-old girl of Kendrapara district lodged a criticism with the police alleging that her husband, who’s in the mean time in Gujarat, on April 1 uttered ‘talaq’ 3 instances after determining from her over the cellphone that she misplaced Rs 1.5 lakh to cyber frauds, thus divorcing her illegally.googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.present(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    The girl is married for the ultimate 15 years and mother of three teenage youngsters.

    A case was registered in the direction of the accused beneath the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, talked about Kendrapara Sadar police station Inspector Saroj Kumar Sahoo.

    The Act bans the observe of fast triple talaq and invites imprisonment of as a lot as three years.

    As the complainant acknowledged that she was moreover subjected to dowry-related torture, circumstances beneath quite a few sections of the IPC and Dowry Prevention Act have moreover been registered, Sahoo talked about.

    The particulars of how the girl misplaced the money to cyber criminals shouldn’t however clear till now.

    The Supreme Court in 2017 banned the controversial observe of fast divorce, setting it aside on numerous grounds along with that it was in the direction of the basic tenets of the Holy Quran and violated the Islamic regulation Shariat.

  • Uttarakhand: Woman will get triple talaq for refusing to go to Saudi on faux passport and stick with stranger

    By Express News Service

    DEHRADUN: On the grievance of a Muslim girl from Dehradun, the police have registered a case in opposition to her estranged husband, brother-in-law, and mother-in-law beneath part 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act.

    This is the third case registered within the state after the triple talaq regulation got here into drive.

    According to Surya Bhushan Negi, SHO of Patelnagar police station, a Muslim girl has lodged a report in opposition to her husband for pressurising her to go to Saudi Arabia by making a faux passport and stick with one other individual for a month. He instructed her that this might fetch them Rs 50 lakh. When the girl refused, her in-laws beat her up and threw her out of the home and on the identical time Nadeem divorced her by uttering talaq thrice exterior the home.

    According to Inspector of Police, Suryabhushan Negi, the girl mentioned that she was married to Nadeem, a resident of Kargi Chowk, on September 2, 2022. 

    According to the police report, Nadeem, who works in Saudi Arabia, had allegedly been pressurising his spouse to get a passport made since every week after the wedding and asking her to not present herself married within the passport. 

     When the sufferer lodged a grievance with the ladies’s helpline, within the first counselling on October 15, the husband provided a compromise. When she went to her in-laws’ home, she was not allowed to enter the home. 

    Earlier, a case beneath the triple talaq Act was registered at Sitarganj in Udham Singh Nagar district.   Triple talaq instances have seen an 82% decline because the regulation was enacted following the Supreme Court’s landmark verdict on triple talaq that gives equality to Muslim girls.

    DEHRADUN: On the grievance of a Muslim girl from Dehradun, the police have registered a case in opposition to her estranged husband, brother-in-law, and mother-in-law beneath part 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act.

    This is the third case registered within the state after the triple talaq regulation got here into drive.

    According to Surya Bhushan Negi, SHO of Patelnagar police station, a Muslim girl has lodged a report in opposition to her husband for pressurising her to go to Saudi Arabia by making a faux passport and stick with one other individual for a month. He instructed her that this might fetch them Rs 50 lakh. When the girl refused, her in-laws beat her up and threw her out of the home and on the identical time Nadeem divorced her by uttering talaq thrice exterior the home.

    According to Inspector of Police, Suryabhushan Negi, the girl mentioned that she was married to Nadeem, a resident of Kargi Chowk, on September 2, 2022. 

    According to the police report, Nadeem, who works in Saudi Arabia, had allegedly been pressurising his spouse to get a passport made since every week after the wedding and asking her to not present herself married within the passport. 

     When the sufferer lodged a grievance with the ladies’s helpline, within the first counselling on October 15, the husband provided a compromise. When she went to her in-laws’ home, she was not allowed to enter the home. 

    Earlier, a case beneath the triple talaq Act was registered at Sitarganj in Udham Singh Nagar district.   Triple talaq instances have seen an 82% decline because the regulation was enacted following the Supreme Court’s landmark verdict on triple talaq that gives equality to Muslim girls.

  • Justice UU Lalit, in line to develop into subsequent CJI, a part of landmark judgements together with triple talaq

    By PTI

    NEW DELHI: Senior-most choose of the Supreme Court Justice U U Lalit, who’s in line to develop into the following Chief Justice of India (CJI), has been a part of a number of landmark judgements together with the one which held the observe of divorce by way of instantaneous ‘triple talaq’ amongst Muslims unlawful and unconstitutional.

    If appointed, Justice Lalit will develop into the second CJI who was instantly elevated to the apex court docket Bench from the Bar.

    Justice S M Sikri, who turned the thirteenth CJI in January 1971, was the primary lawyer to be elevated on to the highest court docket bench in March 1964.

    Justice Lalit is in line to develop into the forty ninth CJI of India on August 27, a day after incumbent Justice N V Ramana demits the workplace.

    Justice Lalit, who was a famend senior advocate, was appointed a choose of the Supreme Court on August 13, 2014.

    He has since been concerned in supply of a number of landmark judgements of the apex court docket.

    One of the path-breaking verdicts was the August 2017 judgement by a five-judge structure bench which by a 3-2 majority dominated the observe of divorce by way of instantaneous ‘triple talaq’ as “void”, “illegal” and “unconstitutional”.

    While then Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice S Abdul Nazeer had been in favour of placing on maintain the judgement for six months and asking the federal government to return out with a legislation to that impact, Justices Kurian Joseph, R F Nariman and U U Lalit held the observe as violative of the Constitution.

    Justices Khehar, Joseph and Nariman have since retired.

    In one other vital judgement, a bench headed by Justice Lalit had dominated the erstwhile royal household of Travancore has the administration proper over the historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Kerala, one of many richest shrines, holding that the rule of “heritability must get attached to a right of Shebait” (servitor) of the temple.

    The bench had allowed the attraction of the authorized heirs of Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma, the youthful brother of the final ruler, Sree Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma, setting apart the Kerala High Court’s 2011 verdict which directed the state authorities to arrange a belief to take management of the administration and belongings of the temple.

    A bench headed by Justice U U Lalit had dominated that touching sexual components of a kid’s physique or any act involving bodily contact with ‘sexual intent’ quantities to ‘sexual assault’ underneath part 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act as an important ingredient is sexual intent and never skin-to-skin contact.

    Quashing the controversial ‘skin-to-skin’ judgements of the Bombay High Court in two circumstances underneath the POCSO Act, the bench had mentioned the excessive court docket erred in holding that there was no offence since there was no direct ‘skin-to-skin’ contact with sexual intent.

    The excessive court docket had held that no offence of sexual assault underneath the POCSO Act was made out if there was no direct skin-to-skin contact between an accused and sufferer.

    Born on November 9, 1957, Justice Lalit had enrolled as an advocate in June 1983 and practised within the Bombay High Court until December 1985.

    He shifted his observe to Delhi in January 1986, and in April 2004, he was designated as a senior advocate by the apex court docket.

    He was appointed a particular public prosecutor for the CBI to conduct trial within the 2G spectrum allocation case.

    Justice Lalit is because of retire on November 8, 2022.

    NEW DELHI: Senior-most choose of the Supreme Court Justice U U Lalit, who’s in line to develop into the following Chief Justice of India (CJI), has been a part of a number of landmark judgements together with the one which held the observe of divorce by way of instantaneous ‘triple talaq’ amongst Muslims unlawful and unconstitutional.

    If appointed, Justice Lalit will develop into the second CJI who was instantly elevated to the apex court docket Bench from the Bar.

    Justice S M Sikri, who turned the thirteenth CJI in January 1971, was the primary lawyer to be elevated on to the highest court docket bench in March 1964.

    Justice Lalit is in line to develop into the forty ninth CJI of India on August 27, a day after incumbent Justice N V Ramana demits the workplace.

    Justice Lalit, who was a famend senior advocate, was appointed a choose of the Supreme Court on August 13, 2014.

    He has since been concerned in supply of a number of landmark judgements of the apex court docket.

    One of the path-breaking verdicts was the August 2017 judgement by a five-judge structure bench which by a 3-2 majority dominated the observe of divorce by way of instantaneous ‘triple talaq’ as “void”, “illegal” and “unconstitutional”.

    While then Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice S Abdul Nazeer had been in favour of placing on maintain the judgement for six months and asking the federal government to return out with a legislation to that impact, Justices Kurian Joseph, R F Nariman and U U Lalit held the observe as violative of the Constitution.

    Justices Khehar, Joseph and Nariman have since retired.

    In one other vital judgement, a bench headed by Justice Lalit had dominated the erstwhile royal household of Travancore has the administration proper over the historic Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple in Kerala, one of many richest shrines, holding that the rule of “heritability must get attached to a right of Shebait” (servitor) of the temple.

    The bench had allowed the attraction of the authorized heirs of Uthradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma, the youthful brother of the final ruler, Sree Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma, setting apart the Kerala High Court’s 2011 verdict which directed the state authorities to arrange a belief to take management of the administration and belongings of the temple.

    A bench headed by Justice U U Lalit had dominated that touching sexual components of a kid’s physique or any act involving bodily contact with ‘sexual intent’ quantities to ‘sexual assault’ underneath part 7 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act as an important ingredient is sexual intent and never skin-to-skin contact.

    Quashing the controversial ‘skin-to-skin’ judgements of the Bombay High Court in two circumstances underneath the POCSO Act, the bench had mentioned the excessive court docket erred in holding that there was no offence since there was no direct ‘skin-to-skin’ contact with sexual intent.

    The excessive court docket had held that no offence of sexual assault underneath the POCSO Act was made out if there was no direct skin-to-skin contact between an accused and sufferer.

    Born on November 9, 1957, Justice Lalit had enrolled as an advocate in June 1983 and practised within the Bombay High Court until December 1985.

    He shifted his observe to Delhi in January 1986, and in April 2004, he was designated as a senior advocate by the apex court docket.

    He was appointed a particular public prosecutor for the CBI to conduct trial within the 2G spectrum allocation case.

    Justice Lalit is because of retire on November 8, 2022.

  • Triple talaqs have dipped after enactment of regulation towards it: Minority panel chief

    Speaking to reporters in Bhopal, NCM member Syed Shahezadi mentioned she had held talks with Muslim ladies over triple talaq and different considerations.

  • Gujarat courtroom sentences authorities ​officer to at least one 12 months jail in triple talaq case

    By PTI

    PALANPUR: A forty five-year-old Class I authorities worker was sentenced to a 12 months in jail by a courtroom in Palanpur of Gujarat’s Bankaskantha district on Wednesday for making an attempt to divorce his spouse of seven years via “triple talaq”.

    This is probably the primary conviction in a triple talaq case in Gujarat, public prosecutor Sanjay Joshi stated.

    The courtroom of further senior civil choose G S Darji sentenced Sarfarazkhan Bihari, a deputy engineer, to a 12 months in jail and imposed a fantastic of Rs 5,000 on him.

    The accused man’s aggrieved spouse, Shehnazbanu, had in September 2019 approached Palanpur (west) police station and an FIR was registered below related sections of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019 and the Indian Penal Code.

    The 2019 Act declares the moment divorce granted by pronouncement of “talaq” thrice as void and unlawful and gives for imprisonment of as much as three years and a fantastic to the husband.

    Bihari acquired married to the complainant in June 2012, they usually have been blessed with a daughter.

    Later, Bihari was transferred to Dantiwada city as a deputy engineer within the authorities’s Sipu pipeline venture and there, he fell in love with a Hindu co-worker, the complainant’s lawyer Govind Makwana stated.

    When Bihari’s household came upon concerning the matter, the complainant’s spouse father met his father they usually determined to shift the couple to a separate rented home in Palanpur metropolis, he stated.

    While they have been dwelling there, the mom and sister of the accused visited them, following which, they quarrelled and the accused acquired offended, beat up his spouse and pronounced “talaq” thrice to divorce her, Makwana stated.

    An FIR was registered on this regard below sections 498 (A) (harassment of a lady), 323 (voluntarily inflicting damage), amongst others of IPC, and sections 3 and 4 of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, he stated.

    The courtroom sentenced Bihari to a 12 months in jail below the 2019 Act, a 12 months in jail below part 498 (A) of IPC and 6 months below part 323 of the IPC, with the sentences working concurrently.

    The public prosecutor, on behalf of the plaintiff, made oral arguments in search of that an instance be set within the society via punishment of the accused.

    The choose took into consideration the written arguments of the petitioner’s lawyer and oral arguments of the general public prosecutor, and sentenced Bihari to at least one 12 months in jail, the complainant’s lawyer stated.

  • Triple talaq trauma: UP girl seeks justice after being divorced 5 occasions for dowry

    Express News Service

    LUCKNOW: In a weird and stunning incident of triple talaq, a lady married in village Tekari Dandu underneath Mill Area police station of Rae Bareli district approached the police authorities in search of their intervention after being divorced 5 occasions alternately by her husband and brother-in-law for dowry and compelled to endure ‘Nikah Halala’ (marrying one other man) twice over the past seven years.

    As per native police sources, the sufferer approached the police authorities when she was compelled for Nikah halala for the third time by her in-laws. The sufferer has given a grievance towards her husband and his quick household in search of their arrest and justice for herself.

    The sources claimed that the sufferer was married to Mohammad Arif of Tekaari Dandu village on April 7, 2015. Arif allegedly began demanding dowry from the lady instantly after the marriage. When the sufferer refused to ask her dad and mom to cough up more cash, a path of her never-ending sufferings and torture began.

    On the provocation of his dad and mom, Mohammad Arif gave triple talaq to the sufferer. When she tried to strategy police authorities, her parents-in-law pressured her to enter into Nikah halala along with her brother–in-law Zahid. She was then married
    to Zahid on October 21, 2016. After halala (consummation of marriage) with Zahid, she was divorced by him to be married once more to Arif on March 23, 2017.

    After a relatively peaceable hiatus, the torture of the sufferer began but once more and Arif divorced her second time. She was even shooed away by the in-laws to her dad and mom’ place. As her dad and mom intervened, a deal was struck between the 2 sides underneath which the sufferer was once more made to marry Zahid and consummated her marriage with him. Zahid was requested to divorce her once more in order that she may marry Arif for the third time, stated the sources.

    The sources added that the sufferer tied the nuptial knot with Arif for the third time on February 21, 2021. The whole trial of torture of the lady continued inside the household with out letting the neighbours get an air about it.

    However, Arif didn’t mend his methods and divorced the lady once more on March 1, 2022. He even pressured her for one more session of nikah halala, this time with Budhai, the husband of his sister.

    The sources claimed that it made the sufferer flee her in-laws house. She went to her dad and mom and acquired a case of dowry and home violence lodged towards husband Arif, mother-in-law Nasreen, brother–in-law Babloo, Babloo’s spouse Buddhan, one other brother-in-law Zahid together with kin Budhai and Rasheed. The case was lodged underneath the Anti-Dowry Act-1961 at Mill Area police station.

    After a span of 25 days when the native police did not make the arrests, the sufferer approached the circle officer (CO) every week again in search of justice for herself. According to CO Vandana Singh, she acquired the case lodged as quickly as she got here to know in regards to the plight of the lady. “We are in the process of consultations over the legal provision in connection with nikah halala. Soon we will proceed in the case ensuring respite to the victim,” stated the CO.

  • UP information: Wife, husband divorced over cellphone from Saudi Arabia in Fatehpur, case filed

    HighlightsFatehpur girl accuses husband of triple talaqThe girl mentioned that the husband gave triple talaq when the demand for dowry was not met; A girl from Saudi Arabia was given triple talaq by her husband over the cellphone. UP Police has began investigation by registering a case on this connection on Tuesday. Inspector (SHO) in-charge of Hathgam police station AK Gautam instructed that Razia Bano, daughter of Mohammad Munna, a resident of Chak Ohadpur village of Hathgam police station, was married on May 21, 2005. Sultanpur Ghosh was with Tasbul, resident of Mohammadpur Gaunti of police station space. The police mentioned that in response to the grievance, husband, father-in-law Maqbool Hasan, mother-in-law Kaiser Jahan, brother-in-law Takirul, Tehjiboul, Jeth Enul, sister-in-law Alfasa, Nandoi, after marriage. Kallu, sister-in-law Nesi weren’t glad, so the sufferer used to beat and torture the girl. Triple talaq given over the cellphone from Saudi He instructed that Razia Bano’s husband Tasabbul has been working in Saudi Arabia. According to the grievance, on Monday, on the cellphone from Saudi Arabia, he mentioned ‘talaq’ to Razia Bano 3 times. So far not one of the accused has been arrested.Indicative image.

  • Nobody has proper to object to sporting burqa: Sunni cleric

    Prominent Sunni cleric Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahali on Thursday stated no one has the best to object to sporting burqa and appealed to everybody to observe their faith whereas respecting others’ religion.
    The assertion comes a day after UP minister Anand Swarup Shukla stated Muslim ladies shall be free of the apply of sporting burqa, which he described as an evil customized and in contrast it to the banned triple talaq. On Tuesday, the minister had additionally written to Ballia district Justice of the Peace, complaining that he’s going through difficulties in discharge of his duties on account of loudspeakers at mosques and stated their volumes needs to be mounted in keeping with court docket orders. Shukla is an MLA from Ballia Nagar constituency.

    📣 JOIN NOW 📣: The Express Explained Telegram Channel

    In a press release issued on Thursday, the cleric stated, “A UP minister first raised some concern over azan, and now over burqa. His claims are completely wrong and baseless, and we oppose it strongly. Nobody has the right to make statements about religious practices. As far as the issue of purdah is concerned, it is part of the Sharia laws. Nobody has the right to object to it.”

    He added, “Hence, my appeal to everyone is that while following their religion, they should respect other religions and their practices. This has been the fantastic tradition of this country and we should follow it. Today during the Covid-19 pandemic, when everyone has been forced to wear masks saying such things is wrong and disappointing.”

  • Woman phases protest in entrance of husband’s dwelling over ‘triple talaq’

    By Express News Service
    KOLLAM: A 23-year-old girl hailing from Chakkuvally, Bharanikhavu right here has been on a satyagraha, in entrance of her in-laws’ residence for the final 14 days, in protest towards the triple talaq allegedly pronounced by her husband. The grievance is towards Mohammad Iqbal, additionally from Chakkuvally, who had acquired married to the lady in 2018. His spouse and her relations mentioned he had divorced her whilst a case relating to the identical was pending earlier than the court docket.

    According to the lady, she and her husband have been collectively for barely 17 days after which he returned to his job abroad. The girl later went again to her mother and father following a dispute together with her mother-in-law. Her kin mentioned the kin of Iqbal then demanded authorized separation.The girl mentioned  she approached the court docket  after the Jamaath and police did not take motion on her grievance. “I received an order from the Sasthamcotta munsiff court to enter my husband’s house. But when I came here with the order, they pushed me out and locked the gate. Since then I have been staging protest outside their home for securing my rights,” she mentioned.

    The girl, who had misplaced her father 9 months in the past,  alleged that Mohammad needed to marry another person after divorcing her. Her relations additionally accused her in-laws of  taking away all her jewelry. A grievance has been lodged with the Sooranad police relating to triple talaq.

    Meanwhile, the police have denied the allegation relating to triple talaq. “There have been disputes between the two and they have mutually decided to end the marriage. Based on the woman’s complaint we have booked a case against her in-laws under Section 498-A. After she went ahead with the protest,  her in-laws shifted to a relative’s place due to the humiliation caused by the incident. Since a case is pending before the court regarding the same, we can take further action in the matter only after the verdict comes, which is scheduled to be pronounced on January 15,” mentioned officers.

    Plaint lodged The girl  mentioned her husband had divorced her whilst a case relating to the identical was pending earlier than the courtA grievance was lodged with the Sooranad police relating to triple talaq