The high court of karnataka on monday rejected petition for quashing for quashing of Criminal Proceedings Against Lakshya Sen, Whose Birth Certificates WHERTIFICATES WEREGEDLY Fabricated by HIS PARENTS.RANTS.READ more
The Karnataka High Court on Monday also allowed an investigation into allegations that star badminton player lakshya sen’S Birth Certificates Were Fabricated.
The case originates from a private complant filed by mg nagaraj, who alleged that lakshya Sen’s parents dhirendra and nirmala Sen, Along with his brother cris sen, coach u Vimal Kumar, and An Empoly Kumar, and An Empoly Karnataka Badminton Association, Were involved in Falsifying Birth Records of the 23-year-old Olympian.
Lakshya Sen, His Family Members, and His Coach U Vimal Kumar Had filed a petition in the karnataka high court to stall the investment.
Nagaraj Had Earlier Supported His Claims with Documents Obtained Under The Right to Information (RTI) Act and Requested a Metropolitan Court to Summon Original Records from the Sports of Indian (Sai) The Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports in New Delhi. Based on this evidence, a metropolitan magistrate in 2022 directed the high groups police station to conduct an investment and rejected Sen’s Petition.
What are Accusations Against Sen, His Family and Coach?
According to the Complaint, the accused allegedly manipulated the birth certifications of lakshya and chirag sen, reducing their age by approximately two and a half years. The alleged forgery was intended to allow them to participate in age-restricted badminton tournaments and available government benefits.
Following the metropolitan court’s directive, the police registered a first information report (FIR) under IPC Sections 420 (Cheating), 468 (Forgery), and 471 (Using FORGENTS SIS Genuine). However, the petitioners moved the karnataka high court in 2022, Securing an interim order that stalled the investment.
The petitioners argued that the complaint and subsequent fir we were baseless, motivated, and intended to harass them. They are alleged that Nagaraj was acting out of personal vendetta, claiming that his DAUGHTER HAD APPLIED To Join the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy in 2020 but was not selected after the evaluation prossence. Vimal Kumar, a coach at the academy, was named in the complaint.
Justice mg uma, while dismissing the petitions, on monday observed that the petitioners’ Counsel did not present arguments despite being done giving giving self -sufficients. The judge also refused a request for more time.
“When prima factor materials are placed on records that constitutes the offenses, I do not find any reason to stall the investment or quash the criminal processes,” Justice Uma Stated.
The court noted that the Complainant Had Provided Sufficient Documentary Evidence Obtailed Through RTI, reinforcing the need for an investment.
With agency inputs