2 males convicted of killing Malcolm X can be exonerated after 55 years

Written by Ashley Southall and Jonah E. Bromwich
Two of the lads discovered responsible of the assassination of Malcolm X are anticipated to have their convictions thrown out Thursday, the Manhattan district lawyer and legal professionals for the 2 males stated, rewriting the official historical past of probably the most infamous murders of the civil rights period.
The exoneration of the 2 males, Muhammad A. Aziz and Khalil Islam, represents a exceptional acknowledgment of grave errors made in a case of towering significance: the 1965 homicide of certainly one of America’s most influential Black leaders within the combat in opposition to racism.
A 22-month investigation performed collectively by the Manhattan district lawyer’s workplace and attorneys for the 2 males discovered that prosecutors and two of the nation’s premier regulation enforcement companies — the FBI and the New York City Police Department — had withheld key proof that, had it been turned over, would possible have led to the lads’s acquittal.
The two males, recognized on the time of the killing as Norman 3X Butler and Thomas 15X Johnson, spent a long time in jail for the homicide, which befell Feb. 21, 1965, when three males opened hearth inside a crowded ballroom on the Audubon Ballroom in Manhattan as Malcolm X was beginning to communicate.
But the case in opposition to them was questionable from the outset and within the a long time since historians and hobbyists have raised doubts concerning the official story.
The evaluation, which was undertaken as an explosive documentary concerning the assassination and a brand new biography renewed curiosity within the case, didn’t establish who prosecutors now imagine actually killed Malcolm X, and those that have been beforehand implicated however by no means arrested are useless.
Nor did it uncover a police or authorities conspiracy to kill him. It additionally left unanswered questions on how and why the police and the federal authorities failed to stop the assassination.
But the acknowledgment by Cyrus Vance Jr., the Manhattan district lawyer who’s among the many nation’s most outstanding native prosecutors, recasts probably the most painful moments in fashionable American historical past.
And at a time when racism and discrimination within the legal justice system are as soon as once more the main focus of a nationwide protest motion, it reveals a bitter fact: that two of the folks convicted of killing Malcolm X — Black Muslim males unexpectedly arrested and tried on shaky proof — have been themselves victims of the very discrimination and injustice that he denounced in language that has echoed throughout the a long time.
In an interview, Vance apologized on behalf of regulation enforcement, which he stated had failed the households of the 2 males. Those failures, he stated, couldn’t be remedied, “but what we can do is acknowledge the error, the severity of the error.”
Vance’s reinvestigation, performed with the Innocence Project and the workplace of David Shanies, a civil rights lawyer, contended with critical obstacles. Many of these concerned within the homicide case, together with witnesses, investigators and trial legal professionals in addition to different potential suspects, died way back. Key paperwork have been misplaced to time and bodily proof, resembling homicide weapons, have been not obtainable to be examined.
“This points to the truth that law enforcement over history has often failed to live up to its responsibilities,” Vance stated. “These men did not get the justice that they deserved.”
Still, the proof obtainable was important.
A trove of FBI paperwork included data that implicated different suspects and pointed away from Islam and Aziz. Prosecutors’ notes point out they did not disclose the presence of undercover officers within the ballroom on the time of the capturing. And Police Department information revealed {that a} reporter for The New York Daily News acquired a name the morning of the capturing indicating that Malcolm X could be murdered.
Investigators additionally interviewed a residing witness, recognized solely as J.M., who backed up Aziz’s alibi, additional suggesting that he had not participated within the capturing however had been, as he stated on the trial, at dwelling nursing his wounded legs.
Altogether, the reinvestigation discovered that had the brand new proof been introduced to a jury, it might nicely have led to acquittals. And Aziz, 83, who was launched in 1985, and Islam, who was launched in 1987 and died in 2009, wouldn’t have been compelled to spend a long time preventing to clear their names.
“This wasn’t a mere oversight,” stated Deborah Francois, an lawyer for the lads. “This was a product of extreme and gross official misconduct.”
The Assassination
The assassination unfolded on a vivid February day, on the daybreak of what was to be a brand new section in Malcolm X’s profession as a civil-rights chief.
He had launched himself to the American public six years earlier, a Nebraska-born avenue hustler turned minister talking forcefully on behalf of the Nation of Islam, the Black nationalist group, about the best way that white authorities abused their energy and brutalized Black folks.
Some of his concepts, espoused throughout his time within the Nation of Islam — he referred to as white folks devils and advocated racial separatism — have been exterior the mainstream even by immediately’s requirements. The information media, which was then virtually wholly white, portrayed Malcolm X as a “racist” and a harmful agitator and referred to the Nation as a “cult.”
But he was additionally an individual of intense fascination, a fiery and persuasive speaker who voiced concepts that many Americans had by no means heard earlier than. And in 1965, a yr after having left the Nation of Islam, he was starting to outline the mission of a brand new group, the Organization of Afro-American Unity — the topic of his deliberate speech on the Audubon Ballroom.
But shortly after he started to talk, he was attacked by three gunmen who rushed the stage, firing at him in entrance of his pregnant spouse and three of his daughters and killing him. He was 39.
One suspect, Mujahid Abdul Halim, was apprehended on the ballroom after being shot within the thigh. Aziz, then referred to as Norman 3X Butler, was arrested 5 days later, and Islam, referred to as Thomas 15X Johnson, one other 5 days after that. Within every week, the three males, all members of the Nation of Islam, had been charged with homicide.
At the trial in 1966, prosecutors forged Islam, who was as soon as Malcolm X’s driver, because the murderer who fired the deadly shotgun blast. Halim and Aziz have been stated to have adopted shut behind, firing their pistols. Ten eyewitnesses stated that they had seen Islam, Aziz or each.
But the witness statements have been contradictory, and no bodily proof tied Aziz or Islam to the homicide, and even the crime scene. Both males supplied credible alibis, which have been backed by testimony from their spouses and mates.
And when Halim, also called Talmadge Hayer, took the stand for the second time throughout the trial and confessed, he insisted that his two co-defendants have been harmless.
On March 11, 1966, all three defendants have been discovered responsible and, a month later, sentenced to life in jail.
Even then, proof was already pointing to a different concept of the case.
An picture offered by the East Orange Police Department exhibits William Bradley. The convictions of two males, Muhammad Aziz and Khalil Islam, are anticipated to be thrown out after a 22-month investigation, validating long-held doubts about who killed Malcolm X. (New York Times)
Reinvestigating the Case
Some of the proof that appeared to exonerate Aziz and Islam emerged throughout their trial, however as a result of key data was withheld by the authorities, its significance solely grew to become clear later.
One protection witness, Ernest Greene, testified that he had seen the person with the shotgun, and described him as dark-skinned, stocky and sporting a “deep” beard — a poor match for Islam, the person who was forged within the position by prosecutors, who was light-skinned, lean and clean-shaven.
But Greene’s description matched one other man, one whose title jurors didn’t hear: William Bradley, a member of the identical Nation of Islam mosque in Newark, New Jersey, as Halim. Bradley was an enforcer for the Nation of Islam, which Malcolm X had joined in 1952 and promoted unceasingly for a dozen years earlier than an acrimonious break the yr earlier than the assassination.
He was lower than 6-feet tall, weighed 182 kilos and was dark-skinned. He had been a machine-gunner within the Marine Corps and his legal historical past included a cost of possessing an unlawful weapon.
The description of Bradley was in FBI information on the time, and Halim even recognized him as one of many assassins. And the authorities have been conscious that the Nation of Islam was concentrating on Malcolm X; every week earlier than the assassination, his home was firebombed whereas he slept inside along with his spouse and daughters.
But it will be years earlier than the connection to Bradley grew to become extra clear, as a succession of newbie investigators — journalists, historians, biographers and others — took up the case.
One of an important of those civilians was Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, who hosted a Netflix documentary collection early final yr that once more assembled the case for the 2 males’s innocence — and others’ guilt. Upon the discharge of the collection, Vance introduced that he would take up the case.
Vance’s investigators, working with Islam and Aziz’s attorneys, examined the proof that had lengthy been laid out and pored over publicly, together with the FBI file on Bradley. (Bradley, who modified his title to Al-Mustafa Shabazz, died in 2018 and his lawyer denied that he had participated within the homicide.)
The bureau’s information contained a report stating that officers in New York had not been informed Bradley was a suspect, in addition to an informant’s secondhand account that Bradley was the shotgun murderer.

The panel additionally interviewed a brand new witness and reviewed reams of data: public statements, prosecutors’ information, courtroom transcripts, and paperwork generated throughout the preliminary investigation, grand jury proceedings, the trial and post-conviction appeals.
One of essentially the most important weaknesses within the authorities’s case, the evaluation discovered, was Halim’s confession and his exoneration of his co-defendants.
Although all three defendants have been members of the Nation of Islam, prosecutors failed to attract any connection between Halim, who attended the mosque in Newark and stated his co-conspirators have been from New Jersey, and Islam and Aziz, who attended the Nation’s mosque in Harlem. Several protection witnesses stated Aziz and Islam have been dwelling on the time of the homicide.
While the general public the evaluation panel sought to interview have been useless, a witness who initially got here ahead at a screening of the documentary supplied an account that appeared to substantiate Aziz’s alibi and had by no means been heard by the authorities.
The witness, recognized as J.M., stated he was dealing with the telephone on the Nation’s Harlem mosque on the day Malcolm X was killed when Aziz referred to as and requested for the mosque’s captain. They hung up whereas J.M. went to search out the captain, after which J.M. referred to as Aziz again on his dwelling telephone. Aziz answered.

Lives Shattered
Representatives for the 2 exonerated males stated that the second meant so much to Aziz, and to Islam’s household. But Shanies, one of many civil rights legal professionals representing them, stated their convictions had a “horrific, torturous and unconscionable” impact that can not be undone.
The two males spent a mixed 42 years in jail, with years in solitary confinement between them. They have been held in a few of New York’s worst most safety prisons within the Seventies, a decade that bore witness to the Attica uprisings.
Aziz had six kids on the time he was convicted; Islam had three. Both males noticed their marriages disintegrate and spent the primes of their lives behind bars.
Even after their launch, they have been understood as Malcolm X’s killers, affecting their skill to reside brazenly in society.
“It affected them in every way you could possibly imagine, them and their families,” Shanies stated.
In the ultimate episode of the documentary collection, Muhammad, the host, asks Aziz to signal a petition asking the Manhattan district lawyer to evaluation his conviction. Aziz obliges, however says that the 20 years he spent in jail had erased his religion that his title would ever be cleared.